I'm jcf, and I endorse this plan.
Cheers,
jcf
On Jun 17, 2015 12:12, "Eric Sorenson" wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2015, jcf wrote:
>
>
>>> I don't think that reflects a firm grasp of the nature of the problem.
>>> The issue is that the "new thing" here is not the thing that the package's
>>> version
There is actually nothing in semver that precludes co-terming major release
versions, and less that precludes "--version" from both displaying the
local package version, AND the release number targeted by said package if
you disagreed with the first point. This is one of those circumstances
wher
