On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Nick Fagerlund <
nick.fagerl...@puppetlabs.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 1:24:42 PM UTC-7, Jon Schewe wrote:
>>
>>
>> So what I'm currently doing is perfectly valid and should continue to
>> work with 2
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Nick Fagerlund <
nick.fagerl...@puppetlabs.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 11:02:55 AM UTC-7, Jon Schewe wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am I getting this right that instead of just leaving the functionality in
>> puppet I should
stead of just leaving the functionality in
puppet I should now call out to another application to have node-specific
variables? This seems like a step in the wrong direction. It's really nice
that in puppet 2.6 I've been able to keep all of my configuration in my
nodes.pp file.
--
Jon Sc
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:20 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Jon Schewe"
> > To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 1:13:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Correct way to handle no
> qualified. Hopefully there will be some clarification on all the variable
> and variable interpolation issues that 2.7 has highlighted, before the
> release of 2.8/3.0
>
> This is just what I have found that works.
>
> G
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 4:05:26 AM
ated because of how
variables are looked for and this behavior will stop working in 2.8.
So what is the correct way to handle this in 2.7?
Thank you.
--
Jon Schewe | http://mtu.net/~jpschewe
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users"
On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:24:19 AM UTC-6, Gary Larizza wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Alexander Swen wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> in the logs of our 2.7.10 puppet master we find messages like these:
>> Dynamic lookup of $functie at /etc/puppet/manifests/server_classes.pp:52
>> i
