I've long used the built-in webrick server since like the v0.25 days and
recently got things serving via passenger just fine. Then I had some
issues with puppetdb-1.6 that got straightened out, but I must have made a
mess out of my setup while debugging that problem. Here's what I see
present
On Tuesday, June 30, 2009 4:58:33 AM UTC-4, Peter Meier wrote:
>
> While looking at the code and
>
> http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/TypeReference#package you'll
> also see that the yum provider is purgeable and that the yum provider
> has an own purge method.
> So if this would fit you
On Tuesday, June 30, 2009 6:22:26 PM UTC-4, lutter wrote:
>
>
> The basic issue is that puppet doesn't know about dependencies (not sure
> it should), but once you throw 'yum -y erase' into the mix, it becomes
> very easy to write inconsistent manifests, where a package erase removes
> a package
I'm trying to fix a bug in facter so that I can submit a patch and
all, but I'm in need of some good documentation of this code
construct. Unfortunately, every search engine I know of strips out
such symbols. I've deduced that it calls an external command and
captures stdout, but need more detai
I keep finding that I wish onlyif was a meta-parameter; right now I
want it on the file resource type.
I need to install a file, but only if the source exists. It's a
really simple file resource that works great when the source exists,
but fails when it doesn't. I don't care if it fails, but I
On May 1, 5:59 pm, Brandon Evans wrote:
> no-can-do. What exactly are you trying to get done?
Apologies for leaving that out -- I'd hoped to not muddy the water
with the details, but now it seems I must.
I want to install a home-built package whose application runs on a
virtual console exclus
On May 2, 10:29 am, Pete Emerson wrote:
> Ah I see a new thread, "Assign variable with content of a file?" that lines
> up with my needs, I'll check out the suggestions there.
Yeah, it's mine! I found yours when I was looking for my own solution
-- it sounds like we're both trying to achieve s
On May 1, 7:28 pm, James Turnbull wrote:
> On the master you can use the generate function to populate a variable
> value.
That looks promising. However, in this particular situation, I cannot
use the regular puppetmasterd/puppetd arrangement. I must use the
stand-alone puppet instead. Will
Anyone know of how I can do in puppet the equivalent of this from the
land of shell scripting?
foo=$(cat /tmp/bar)
or if you prefer
foo=`cat /tmp/bar`
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users"
Pete,
The only thing affected by onlyif here is the /bin/echo command
itself. You can even see this in your logged output.
On May 1, 1:56 pm, Pete Emerson wrote:
> I'm trying to get a cron entry to exist based on the contents of a file.
>
> I tried this:
>
> exec { "check-cron":
>
I'm seeing a undesirable change in behaviour of puppet on Fedora 10
that came about with the upgrade from 0.24.6 to 0.24.8. I have been
working on a wrapper package for puppet (non-daemon) that allows it to
operate reliably even when the network isn't so reliable. Each client
maintains (via rsyn
On Dec 17, 5:18 pm, James Turnbull wrote:
> An upstart provider for the service type should be fine. It should be
> relatively easy to develop. If you don't want to develop yourself can
> you please log a feature request and I'll knock something up.
>
> Cheers
>
> James
>
> --
> Author of:
>
> What do you need to work around? Isn't Upstart, from a userspace
> perspective, completely backwards compatible with SysV init?
>
> Can you cite your specific issues?
Yes and no; or at least that's my understanding. From what I've seen
it can be used in such a way that it appears to be sysvin
I'm playing around with puppet 0.24.6 on Fedora 10. It appears that
the service type doesn't support the new upstart way of doing
things ... only the old sysvinit way. Has anyone seen any effort
towards providing support or simply some decent work arounds?
--~--~-~--~~~--
Funny. I was nearly about to give up hope and then that very thought
occurred to me a bit after posting my last message. When I had
initially read the docs, I kind of got the impression that was meant
more for debugging only. As it turns out, it looks to be absolutely
perfect for the task. I h
last successful run. Any
ideas how I might achieve this?
On Dec 8, 2:14 pm, John Florian wrote:
> I am reviewing puppet for suitability on a project that I'm working
> on. In many regards, it looks perfect and I'm very pleased with the
> overall feel thus far. For a proof-
I am reviewing puppet for suitability on a project that I'm working
on. In many regards, it looks perfect and I'm very pleased with the
overall feel thus far. For a proof-of-concept example, I've created a
manifest that ensures that the ntp package is installed on the client,
that it has the cor
17 matches
Mail list logo
