Re: [Puppet Users] autosign by IP address range

2010-10-22 Thread David Grundy
Thanks Patrick. I was just gathering information. I had to give an overview of puppet and our test implementation to our operations manager. Just wanted to make sure I had an answer. It seems like a non issue from here anyway. Cheers, David On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Patrick wrote:

Re: [Puppet Users] modifiying facts that facter collects

2010-10-13 Thread David Grundy
a single machine is "custom > facts". (Google it) > > If you want to push them out automatically using puppet, try "adding > facts". (Google it) > > > On Oct 12, 2010, at 4:20 PM, David Grundy wrote: > > > Hello All. > > > > Is there some way

[Puppet Users] modifiying facts that facter collects

2010-10-12 Thread David Grundy
Hello All. Is there some way to create new facts for facter to report? Is there a configuration file somewhere for facter? Thanks in advance. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-u

Re: [Puppet Users] Using mac addresses for unique identifier of nodes?

2010-10-07 Thread David Grundy
Thanks. This was the answer I was originally looking for. If you didn't notice my last post, I have since found out that the mac addresses won't persist upon reboot so I will have to configure a sensible hostname for each VM before connecting to puppetmaster. Cheers, David On Thu, Oct 7, 2010

Re: [Puppet Users] Using mac addresses for unique identifier of nodes?

2010-10-07 Thread David Grundy
Thanks for your reply. To answer your question, yes the new VM will be built with puppet installed and configured. Since I posted this I have found out that the mac address will not persist upon reboot so I need to find another way of naming each new VM uniquely before it can be configured by pup