An interesting thought. If you enable graph output in your puppet.conf
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/references/stable/configuration.html#graph
you can identify those sub-graphs that could run in parallel pretty
easily, just by eyeballing it. Parallel execution is wonderful for an
optimizing com
It's not uncommon to run a small staging environment for just this
purpose. Have you evaluated something like that and found it wanting?
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Ryan Bowlby wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We'd like to do some form of testing of our module changes against
> production nodes before be
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Jonathan Proulx wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Brian Troutwine wrote:
>> I'm a big fan of using read-only submodules, usually to the upstream
>> project but sometimes to my own fork. The use of submodules makes
>> gettin
I'm a big fan of using read-only submodules, usually to the upstream
project but sometimes to my own fork. The use of submodules makes
getting changes in from upstream trivial. The commands you need to
know are:
git submodule add
git submodule sync
git submodule update --init --recursi
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:07 PM, ruslan usifov wrote:
> Hello
>
> Does anybody share how to roll-back configuration if puppet definition on
> host is change. For example Let's assume we have host on which initial was
> web server and bunch of users. All this resources we configured throw
> puppet.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Peter Berghold wrote:
> "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from."
> -- Andrew S Tannenbaum
>
> Debian does wonky things when you install a gem from "gem install." Usually
> this isn't a problem unless there are executables to consi
All,
I ended up posting the question to ServerFault, where it was answered.
http://serverfault.com/questions/355214/why-does-this-nginx-thin-run-puppet-master-interpret-paths-differently-than-a-lo
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Brian Troutwine wrote:
> For the purposes of this email I need
For the purposes of this email I need to make a distinction between my
Production puppet master and my Development puppet master. In either
case, my /etc/puppet/puppet.conf is:
[main]
ssldir=$vardir/ssl
[master]
certname=puppet
Development puppet master is run:
# puppetmaste
All,
I've been using puppet in production for some time now, using a
staging environment duplicate to my production setup for developing
and testing puppet modules. Not, however, in an automated fashion: I
write, I run 'puppet agent --test' and I repeat until satisfied.
Sometimes, owing to partial
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Schulte <
stefan.schu...@taunusstein.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:53:58PM -0400, Brian Troutwine wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Stefan Schulte <
> > stefan.schu...@taunusstein.net> wrote:
> >
>
Kit,
What puppet/facter versions, which OS and what VM? Also, what is the content
of your fstab?
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Kit Plummer wrote:
> Am I the only one seeing this? Permissions, or OS thing?
>
> On Aug 18, 8:14 pm, Kit Plummer wrote:
> > Hey.
> >
> > I'm using Facter to publi
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Gary Larizza wrote:
>
>
> It's a function of my ignorance of writing custom facts. I have yet to find
>> a good reference for doing so and aped entirely code examples found online.
>> I haven't the slightest idea of what setcode does. Here's my top search
>> resu
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:19 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 21, 2:56 pm, Brian Troutwine wrote:
> > Hello, all.
> >
> > I have a box that I'd like to have striping swap spaces. I attempted:
> >
> > mount { 'swap':
> >
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Stefan Schulte <
stefan.schu...@taunusstein.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:19:35AM -0700, jcbollinger wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Aug 21, 2:56 pm, Brian Troutwine wrote:
> > > Hello, all.
> > >
> > > I ha
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 22, 2:08 am, Brian Troutwine wrote:
> > Hello, all.
> >
> > I am unable to get the utilize the output of a custom fact in a template
> > while, simultaniously, succeeding at doing so with anot
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:11 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 19, 7:30 pm, Brian Troutwine wrote:
> > Hello, all.
> >
> > Let's say I am building a super-weapon robot to destroy the world, save
> for
> > the people on a whitelist, and am using puppet
Hello, all.
I am unable to get the utilize the output of a custom fact in a template
while, simultaniously, succeeding at doing so with another custom fact. I
receive no errors and am utterly at a loss. The failing custom fact that
looks like this:
# cat /var/lib/puppet/lib/facter/memorysize_mb.r
Hello, all.
I have a box that I'd like to have striping swap spaces. I attempted:
mount { 'swap':
alias => 'swap0',
atboot => true,
device => '/dev/xvdo',
ensure => 'mounted',
options=> 'defaults',
fstype => 'swap',
}
mount { 'swap':
alias => 'swap1',
atb
ave an 'onlyif' parameter.
>
> So, you can turn your package install definition into an exec that has a
> pre-condition.
> exec {aptpackage:
> command => apt install thing,
> onlyif => sometest cond
> }
>
> That may work better for you.
>
> Den
>
>
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Nicolai wrote:
> To make sure you have a clean client and master knows nothing about it,
> (ssl-wise) do the following:
>
> on master:
> puppetca --clean client.example.com
>
> on client:
> rm -r /var/lib/puppet/ssl
> puppetd --test
>
The puppetca and puppetd too
patibility. In fact, I've heard so often
that I should be using the same versions together than I'm rather nonplussed
that it's not possible to put the client and master into strict mode, such
that they'll _only_ function together if they've got compatible versions.
Den
y declare the state of a resource once. It can't be present
> and absent at the same time.
>
> Den
>
>
> On 21/08/2011, at 8:50, Brian Troutwine wrote:
>
> PEBKAC, all.
>
> My images were already tainted with 01proxy, so it existed before the
> installation of the apt
lib/puppet/ssl/certs/ca.pem
connect: Connection refused
connect:errno=111
while
# puppet agent --server puppet.example.com --test
ran to completion, with no errors. That leaves me even more confused than
before, frankly. It's possible I'm not using openssl s_client correctly, but
I
y => Service['apt-cacher'],
> }
> ...
>}
> }
>
> node 'apt.example.com' {
> include base, aptcacher
> }
>
>
> 01proxy is placed in the filesystem before the Package apt-cacher is
> installed or the Service apt-cacher started.
&
}
}
node 'apt.example.com' {
include base, aptcacher
}
01proxy is placed in the filesystem before the Package apt-cacher is
installed or the Service apt-cacher started.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Brian Troutwine wrote:
> I meant to include more material and have inserted it inl
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Brian Troutwine wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Brian Troutwine wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Laurence Southon <
>> l...@tiger-computing.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On 20/08/11 01:13, Brian Troutwine
I meant to include more material and have inserted it inline below. My
apologies.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Brian Troutwine wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
> I have a module for apt-cacher and a node definition something like this:
>
> class base {
> file { '/etc
Hello, all.
I have a module for apt-cacher and a node definition something like this:
class base {
file { '/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01proxy':
...
}
}
node 'apt.example.com' {
include base, aptcacher
Class['aptcacher'] -> File['/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01proxy']
}
I'm attempting
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Brian Troutwine wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Laurence Southon <
> l...@tiger-computing.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 20/08/11 01:13, Brian Troutwine wrote:
>> > How do I actually revoke a faulty certificate?
>>
>
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Laurence Southon wrote:
> On 20/08/11 01:13, Brian Troutwine wrote:
> > How do I actually revoke a faulty certificate?
>
> You can remove the client certificate entirely with:
>
> puppetca --clean apt.example.com
I overlooked that entire
Hello, all.
Let's say I authenticate a server against my puppet master at
puppet.example.com, we'll call it apt.example.com. All goes well; it's
peachy. Then, apt.example.com dies and I have to authenticate a _new_
apt.example.com against puppet master.
root@apt:~# puppet agent --test --noop
info
Hello, all.
Let's say I am building a super-weapon robot to destroy the world, save for
the people on a whitelist, and am using puppet to manage the configuration
of this robot.
$ cat files/do_not_kill.txt
Me
Mom
Dad
Wife
The robot will only being its rampage when /root/have_a_good_time exists.
32 matches
Mail list logo
