On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Felix Frank
wrote:
>> Yes: the class statement in the equivalent of "include", as well as
>> assigning that metadata.
>
> ...the workaround being: Use class instead of include in your ruby
> manifest (is this available?) and select the desired stage right there.
It
So I am using a mix of old puppet and the Ruby DSL on a new project
(loving it, new as it is!). But I've run into some behavior that
surprised me.
In my default node, (.pp), I have, among others, these lines:
node "default" {
class { 'amqp': stage => system }
include roles
}
(It seems that w
Yep, that did the trick. Seems I extrapolated the 'string that looks
like puppet' one step too far. I added an example to the wiki.
Thanks,
Ben
On Jan 10, 2:58 pm, Stefan Schulte
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:27:13PM -0800, Ben Lavender wrote:
> > I'm loving pla
I'm loving playing around with the DSL. There are some problems (ie
5237), but now that it's Ruby, I can fix them! woo!
However, I'm stumped on this one, which may or may not be related to
the DSL. When trying to have a resource have a simple dependency on
two things at once, it simply fails, an
Hi all,
I'm setting up a buzzword-compliant auto-scaling thing on EC2, and I
have something I'd like some more opinion on. Namely, I am going to
be making my own AMI (getting the app set up takes ~20 mins
otherwise), and it seems perfectly workable to store the entire config
in /etc/puppet and ju
*slap forehead*
This is on 0.25.4, the latest gem as of ~2 weeks ago.
Thanks,
Ben
On Mar 5, 2:18 pm, Peter Meier wrote:
> Zitat von Ben Lavender :
>
>
>
> > Can someone tell me what's wrong here? Or should I reopen #2487,
> >http://projects.
Can someone tell me what's wrong here? Or should I reopen #2487,
http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/2487 ?
I have this config:
===
class devusers {
dev_user { "ben":
uid => 510,
keytype => "ssh-rsa",
keyname => "b...@7.106.cp",
key => "blahblah"
}
dev_user { "yuri":
Hi,
I'm trying to create an authorized key and a user in one go and I'm
not getting anywhere:
class users {
user { "ben" :
ensure => present,
uid => 1010,
gid => "users",
managehome => true,
password => "blahblah"
}
ssh_authorized_key { "ben-key":
ensure => present,
>> That's exactly the reason (I presume) why the redhat provider doesn't
>> set hasstatus.
>
> I run sshd under runit and wanted to ensure that there was no sshd
> daemon started from the standard init script.
>
> I use this:
>
> status => "pgrep -f '/usr/sbin/sshd' -P 1"
>
> ie. check for ssh
I suppose this
little gotcha is not a bad thing to have on the mailing list for
google to find in any case.
Thanks again for the help!
Ben
On Sep 18, 10:41 am, David Schmitt wrote:
> Ben Lavender wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> > I'm confused why puppet wont start a service I
Hello,
I'm confused why puppet wont start a service I have configured.
In the module, which is definitely being run (everything else in it
works):
service { ssh:
name => 'sshd',
ensure => true,
enable => true
}
As I understand the docs, the ensure => true should start sshd if it
is n
n Marcus
> 505-667-5666
>
> On Aug 5, 2009, at 10:52 PM, Ben Lavender wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Actually, I take that back--it would not appear to be the same issue
> > as #2494 at all.
>
> > I also have the functions file in this directory:
> > /etc/pup
/WritingYourOwnFunctions ,
but it was not. I'm starting to worry that I'm missing something
terribly simple and obvious.
Ben
On Aug 6, 1:47 am, Ben Lavender wrote:
> Perhaps this is the same issue, but the workaround does not seem to
> work. Starting puppetmasterd with --libdir=/va
Thanks. This is a good idea to try and fix this.
On Aug 5, 8:34 pm, Nicolas Szalay wrote:
> Le mercredi 05 août 2009 à 04:01 -0700, Ben Lavender a écrit :
>
> > For the reasons you just explained, this won't do. Users like daemon,
> > cron, and various system accounts a
Perhaps this is the same issue, but the workaround does not seem to
work. Starting puppetmasterd with --libdir=/var/lib/puppet/lib does
not fix the problem.
On Aug 5, 9:13 pm, Larry Ludwig wrote:
> > Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong here? According to the link
> > referenced above, pup
> If that's really what you want -- purging /etc/passwd -- using a File
> would be much easier and directly capture your intent:
>
> file {
> "/etc/passwd":
> ensure => absent;
> }
>
> I'd recommend to provide at least a few system users in
I'm trying to manage my userbase in puppet and having some trouble.
My setup: users exist in LDAP. Public keys exist in LDAP (I really
recommend this patch, see http://code.google.com/p/openssh-lpk/wiki/Main).
Some machines use NFS to mount an exported set of home directories;
others do not.
T
Hello,
I'm trying to do almost exactly what the cookbook at
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/WritingYourOwnFunctions is
doing, namely, adding a custom hash function to determine what time
cron should run.
However, I can't get puppet to find my function. I've got it
symlinked all over:
On Jul 7, 6:17 pm, Scott Smith wrote:
> Ben Lavender wrote:
> > I'm not trying to define the mounts themselves in puppet.
>
> Why not?
Because:
* I do not see the point in doing necessarily per-machine
configuration centrally. One day when it's all on a SAN, that mig
Hello,
I'm having trouble finding a way to ensure that NFS clients on each of
my managed machines are suid. I am not trying to manage the mount
points themselves with puppet (another discussion, but I don't see the
advantages to machine-specific configuration being done centrally).
This means th
Hello,
I'm in the process of setting up puppet for my installation. One of
the things I'm tasked with doing is making sure that all network
mounts are nosuid.
I'm not entirely sure how to do this. I don't think I want the
'mount' type; I'm not trying to define the mounts themselves in
puppet.
21 matches
Mail list logo
