Re: [Puppet Users] Re: "Open Source Team" planning meeting summary

On 5/31/2011 9:07 PM, Jacob Helwig wrote: > On Tue, 31 May 2011 20:56:47 -0600, Alan Sparks wrote: >> >>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Jacob Helwig >> <mailto:ja...@puppetlabs.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Just a quick reminder that we're

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: "Open Source Team" planning meeting summary

On 5/31/2011 7:19 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Jacob Helwig > wrote: > > On Thu, 26 May 2011 09:38:28 -0700, Jacob Helwig wrote: > > > > As promised yesterday, here are the results of our first planning > > meeting

Re: [Puppet Users] Definitions in External Nodes

On 8/30/2010 9:44 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > This is much clearer now. > > Can you not solve this problem with extlookup now rather than having > to write custom functions? Either key the relevant data off a base > variable, or set the key to lookup info for in the external node > provider? > > I

[Puppet Users] parameterized class, external nodes?

How do you (if you can) represent a parameterized class reference in an external node YAML description (exec terminus)? -Alan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To

Re: [Puppet Users] 0.24.8: puppetd --onetime and schedules?

Ryan Dooley wrote: > Howdy Alan, > > On 7/21/2010 6:04 PM, Alan Sparks wrote: > >> Is there an issue with --onetime and schedules? Is there something else >> that needs to be supplied to make --onetime work as expected (aside from >> --ignoreschedules; I

Re: [Puppet Users] 2.6, parameterized classes, external nodes

Patrick Mohr wrote: > On Jul 21, 2010, at 5:44 PM, Alan Sparks wrote: > > >> Many of us have the problem of needing to simulate the instantiation of >> definitions via external nodes (e.g., the multiple Apache vhosts >> situation, or multiple service instantiations wi

[Puppet Users] 0.24.8: puppetd --onetime and schedules?

I have a custom schedule to apply changes to various classes (e.g., "File { schedule => normal }"). This works fine for puppetd running as a daemon. However, I note that if I run puppetd with the --onetime option, it applies none of my actions. puppetd --test will apply them, and the normal pupp

[Puppet Users] 2.6, parameterized classes, external nodes

The release notes do not mention whether the external node classifier system now supports parameterized classes, and if so, what the syntax expected would be to use it. Is this supported? Also, the release notes indicate with respect to parameterized classes: "with the significant difference that

Re: [Puppet Users] Export resource issue - "more than one of content, source, target"

Alan Sparks wrote: > I'm trying to create an exported file resource and receiving a vague > error message: > Apr 5 18:01:04 ny4-dev-util01 puppetd[12860]: Could not run Puppet > configuration client: You cannot specify more than one of content, > source, target at line 102

[Puppet Users] Export resource issue - "more than one of content, source, target"

I'm trying to create an exported file resource and receiving a vague error message: Apr 5 18:01:04 ny4-dev-util01 puppetd[12860]: Could not run Puppet configuration client: You cannot specify more than one of content, source, target at line 102 A puppet client (it's 0.24.8) is creating the follo

Re: [Puppet Users] Quiesce Puppet?

Douglas Garstang wrote: > Is there a way to quiesce the puppet daemon, such that it stays > running, but does not run updates, until instructed again to do so? > > We have puppet deploying our software, and would like to quiesce > puppetd so that it doesn't restart services etc until after the > up

Re: [Puppet Users] tidy -- ignoring sockets?

Luke Kanies wrote: > On Feb 26, 2010, at 12:07 PM, Alan Sparks wrote: >> >> Since tidy does not have a parameter for directories or files to ignore, >> and there's no option to specify the types of files to consider, is >> there any way short of hacking the code

[Puppet Users] tidy -- ignoring sockets?

I've a tidy resource for /tmp under 0.24.8, which throws errors each run due to a socket file created by xfs under /tmp/.font-unix/. It's relatively harmless, but it fills the logs with error messages... /var/log/messages.4:Jan 31 04:01:34 vm03 puppetd[15362]: (//Node[vm03]/Tidy::Olderthan[/tmp]/

[Puppet Users] ssh_authorized_key - same key, different accounts?

Puppet 0.24.8... I am trying to use ssh_authorized_key to create passwordless logins for a couple of accounts. The important thing to note is I'm trying to get the source ("r...@somehost" below) as part of the key, and the same key needs to be added to two different accounts on the system. It app

Re: [Puppet Users] What does it take to use a second fileserver?

Dan Bode wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Alan Sparks > mailto:aspa...@doublesparks.net>> wrote: > > I've a manifest that is trying to use a fileserver resource I've > configured on a second puppetmaster. The second puppetmaster

[Puppet Users] What does it take to use a second fileserver?

I've a manifest that is trying to use a fileserver resource I've configured on a second puppetmaster. The second puppetmaster is actually working as the main puppetmaster for my domain - this new puppetmaster is one I've set up to test migrating to new manifests. Unfortunately, I've re-entered SS

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppetrun with parameters

e service could appear to be running but is actually failing... Thanks for the hint. -Alan RijilV wrote: > > > 2008/11/24 Alan Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > > This is a sort of open-ended question, to find out if the concept is >

[Puppet Users] Puppetrun with parameters

This is a sort of open-ended question, to find out if the concept is possible or has been done... I have used cfengine in the past to do assisted autorecovery of systems, by integrating Hobbit paging with cfrun. In those cases, I've added classes to cfengine rules to use dynamically-defined clas