Dan, thank you for that feedback. It actually did educate me; however, (a
week later from me) I learned this morning what had happened.
Neither agent was properly checking in. 1 due to NetworkManager problems
on a RHEL6 system, and the other the Puppet Agent service wasn't enabled to
run as a dae
Facter developer attention is with the C++ based facter 3.x, and I get why.
However, some of us use puppet open source on platforms (eg Solaris, AIX)
where it is difficult/impossible to get the toolchain needed to compile it.
I am using ruby facter 2.4.6 on these UNIX boxes, which hasn't been up
I am looking to see if I can make this work with a define or have to resort
to an each loop. Still hacking away to see what I can find. With the each
I can still loop through to try to get to the goal of having a key/value
pair to pass on to a template only if the current client matches one of
I apparently use a different sudo module than you do (saz/sudo), but have
the same concerns. We have a general sudoers setup that gets applied to all
nodes and additional config for certain roles. We manage this in the base
profile class using iteration (note: I don't think I guard against
`$su
Hey guys,
I just wanted to give you a follow-up on this topic (maybe somebody will
have the same question in the future).
All ideas have been helpful but fpm is awesome :)
I now build rpm's from software which do need dependencies,
pre/post(un)install scripts etc., but if there's no need for tha
Hi List,
I'm on the verge of refactoring all our modules to the roles&profile
workflow with r10k etc. and the stuff is taking shape - thanks for all the
help so far! - and the only thing I'm still not very convenient with is the
naming/grouping of data put into Hiera and using that data in the pro
