RE: [Puppet Users] resource collector with multiple 'tag !=' test

Hi, I'm aware it is a bit 'unlogic' :) but that's how it works now.  Thx for the ticket, will follow it to see what happens Grts Johan -Original message- From: Isaiah Frantz  Sent: Thursday 22nd September 2016 20:44 To: Puppet Users Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] resource colle

[Puppet Users] Announce: Puppet Agent 1.7.0 is available

Puppet Agent 1.7.0 is now available. This is the first release of the puppet-agent with .deb and .rpm packages signed with our new GPG signing key. This release also includes Puppet 4.7.0, which contains a fix for a bug potentially affecting Puppet Server’s HTTP ‘/status’ endpoint. Please see our

Re: [Puppet Users] resource collector with multiple 'tag !=' test

I disagree, the way it works breaks basic logic. With the == case, if the property is an array type, the code will only return objects that contain the term. The != case only checks for equality, regardless of the object type. It *should*, in my opinion, follow basic negation rules and do the opp

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: mount point directory permissions

On 9/22/16 6:54 AM, otheus uibk wrote: > Chiming in... > > The old feature request at https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4815 > had it right. This should > be a part of the core Mount resource type. Eric's rejection of it was > stupid. On most syst

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: mount point directory permissions

Chiming in... The old feature request at https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4815 had it right. This should be a part of the core Mount resource type. Eric's rejection of it was stupid. On most systems, when you mount a volume, the underlying fil