Yes, puppetdb is running :(
Thanks and Regards,
Manoj Kumar
FB : http://www.facebook.com/manojksamtani
Blogger: http://linuxtroubleshoot.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Lowe Schmidt wrote:
> Is PuppetDB running?
>
> --
> Lowe Schmidt | +46 723 867 157
>
> On 25 January 2016 at 13
On 19.01.2016 02:53, Jakov Sosic wrote:
> On 01/19/2016 02:52 AM, Jakov Sosic wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>>
>> I've noticed the following problem with one of my providers in v4.
>>
>> This is the original prefetch method I used:
>>
>> def self.prefetch(resources)
>> instances.each do |prov|
Hello,
I've got a quick question about the exec type. The exec type does have a
shell provider and a posix provider and the posix provider says
#
https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet/blob/master/lib/puppet/provider/exec/posix.rb
Executes external binaries **directly, without passing throu
Facter 2.4.6 reverts the changes made for FACT-380. It is otherwise
identical to Facter 2.4.5.
To download Facter, follow the instructions here:
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/puppet/3.8/reference/pre_install.html
Release notes are available here:
https://docs.puppetlabs.com/facter/2.4/release_notes.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:25:03PM -0800, Patrick Lesher wrote:
>Has anyone thought about or tried to have r10k run against a mysql backend
>to populate at least the information the puppetfile gives?
Not quite the same problem or solution, but we use basemodulepath to keep a
common set of
Yea, I don't see why you couldn't reach out to a redis instance and grab
the data and then generate the puppetfile. Curious if there is a way to
get the current branch that r10k would be using at time of execution?
On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 10:27:58 AM UTC-8, Patrick Lesher wrote:
>
>
>
Puppet 4 is "supported" when using --enable-future-parser, retrospec will
create everything needed to test puppet4 except for the actual tests blocks
for classes and defines. If you have a bunch of parameters to mock
retrospec will generate the let(:params) block. All the new generators
don'
On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 5:09:11 AM UTC-8, Clayton O'Neill wrote:
>
> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 6:48:07 PM UTC-5, Patrick Lesher wrote:
>
>> Has anyone thought about or tried to have r10k run against a mysql
>> backend to populate at least the information the puppetfile gives?
>>
>>
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:16 AM, jcbollinger
wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 5:48:18 PM UTC-6, Diego Roccia wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm migrating my puppet configuration from 3.6 to v4.2, but I'm having
>> some problem with ip type facts. For example, I have this line :
>>
>> priority
Implied but not explicit … Puppet 4 supported now?
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 8:59 AM, Corey Osman wrote:
>
> Happy to announce that release 0.12.0 of puppet-retrospec is now available.
> Its taking me a long time to get this ready and this is a huge feature
> update, but retrospec is now even mo
Hi,
over the weekend there was a situation where the newest puppet versions
(3.8.5 and 4.3.2) would interact badly with the latest version of
rspec-puppet (2.3.0).
Yesterday I uploaded 2.3.1 to fix the issue with 3.8.5 and today there is
2.3.2 to completely fix this across all puppet versions.
I
Happy to announce that release 0.12.0 of puppet-retrospec is now available.
Its taking me a long time to get this ready and this is a huge feature update,
but retrospec is now even more useful. Retrospec can now automatically
generate some of the more complex puppet module files like facts, f
Hi Björn,
depends on how you would like to implement the fully automatic configuration. I
do this on the server side because backup is nothing that apply out of the box
after provisioning to the client and server. Under normal circumstances I would
like to add a client only to the backup if rea
Hi Lowe,
Here are the details
This is the directory structure for manifests file site.pp and nodes.pp :-
"C:\Maruti\Puppet\manifests"
The is the code for site.pp file
import 'nodes.pp'
This is the code for nodes.pp file
node 'IMIBLRKA1030' {
include apache
}
This is the dire
On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 5:48:18 PM UTC-6, Diego Roccia wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I'm migrating my puppet configuration from 3.6 to v4.2, but I'm having
> some problem with ip type facts. For example, I have this line :
>
> priority => inline_template('<%= 256 -
> ipaddress.split(".")[3]
On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 6:48:07 PM UTC-5, Patrick Lesher wrote:
> Has anyone thought about or tried to have r10k run against a mysql backend
> to populate at least the information the puppetfile gives?
>
> Updating each puppetfile for a large number of “Environments” can be
> burdonsome w
You will have to show us the relevant puppet code and link to the module
you are using.
Also read the link in the error message.
--
Lowe Schmidt | +46 723 867 157
On 25 January 2016 at 21:11, Maruti Gangumolu
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I'm new to puppet coding and I'm trying to install apache tomc
Is PuppetDB running?
--
Lowe Schmidt | +46 723 867 157
On 25 January 2016 at 13:29, Manoj Kumar wrote:
> Getting following error in apache logs :
>
> [Mon Jan 25 11:44:21.960584 2016] [:error] [pid 13523]
> ERROR:pypuppetdb.api:Not Found localhost:8080 over HTTP.
> [Mon Jan 25 11:44:21.964374 2
18 matches
Mail list logo
