Or place those values in hiera.
> On 15 Feb 2014, at 0:12, Johan De Wit wrote:
>
> If you need information from the client, then you should think 'facter'.
>
> Or you could write a custom fact, or use external facts.
>
> http://puppetlabs.com/blog/facter-1-7-introduces-external-facts
> http:/
This is a fantastic idea! Any progress on this?
On Sunday, March 4, 2012 10:53:23 PM UTC-5, Jon Forrest wrote:
>
> As many learning Puppet for the first time, the fact that the
> order of actions is undefined unless specific metaparameters
> like 'require' are used. Fine.
>
> This got me to thinki
Here's one. (When it's in this state I can ssh in and do a sudo puppet
agent -t and everything's fine again.)
https://gist.github.com/pkpowell/9011179
Somewhat surprisingly there was no private info there to redact. Would
there be more relevant info in the system.log?
Cheers
Phil
On Friday
I ran it as me and it behaved the same.
On Friday, February 14, 2014 1:57:12 PM UTC-8, Rob Reynolds wrote:
>
> It looks to be a possible bug in the chocolatey provider that happens when
> we try to capture both error and regular logging when an error has
> occurred. Keep a watch on the issue its
I'm experiencing an odd problem with one of my Puppet clients. These
systems are identical in configuration, but this one hangs with:
puppet agent: applying configurat
and I see a yum process.
I checked that yum can operate on its own (it does) and there's no other
process locking.
There's
It looks to be a possible bug in the chocolatey provider that happens when
we try to capture both error and regular logging when an error has
occurred. Keep a watch on the issue itself for updates.
In the meantime if you are using SYSTEM for the puppet agent, I would
switch to something with netwo
Some improvement. I'll attach another chocolateyinstall log below. It
still didn't install the agent, but it also didn't add an entry to /lib, so
I'm guessing it will keep trying. Looks like the same error downloading
the file.
http://pastebin.com/BFd90qkb
On Friday, February 14, 2014 10:5
Let's have you upgrade chocolatey to 0.9.8.23 and see if the issue still
happens. The paste bin shows 0.9.8.20.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Rob Reynolds wrote:
> You are running into an issue we have seen but have not been able to
> reproduce effectively -
> https://github.com/chocolatey/
The following is a copy of my log:
http://pastebin.com/wz5peZbG
Looks like the download failed. Perhaps a problem with puppet not being
able to access my personal temp folder?
On Friday, February 14, 2014 9:58:53 AM UTC-8, Rob Reynolds wrote:
>
> I looks like it does install the package, but may
You are running into an issue we have seen but have not been able to
reproduce effectively -
https://github.com/chocolatey/puppet-chocolatey/issues/18
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Jay Benner wrote:
> The following is a copy of my log:
> http://pastebin.com/wz5peZbG
> Looks like the downloa
Phil, Kristian,
Would you mind posting a gist (any private info retracted of course)
of the logs you find this information in?
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Philip Powell wrote:
> I have the same problem.
> Looking at the puppet logs on the affected nodes it looks like the puppet
> agent will
I looks like it does install the package, but may be running into something
else when it is running. In C:\chocolatey\chocolateyInstall there are some
log files, what does the log file say about the installation?
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Jay Benner wrote:
> I had deleted the entry in /l
Hi,
I have created few external facts by putting an yaml file in
/etc/puppetlabs/facter/facts.d folder on agent and they are available in
puppetdb and in my erb templates.
But I am not able to use them in puppet manifests.I am getting undef value.
Is there anyway to use them?
Deep
--
You re
Argh, umm, never mind then - guess I'm a 2.7.x fossil after all ><'
On 02/14/2014 04:18 PM, zerozerouno...@gmail.com wrote:
> According
> to
> http://docs.puppetlabs.com/puppet/latest/reference/lang_collectors.html#and it
> should be supported:
--
You received this message because you are subsc
Hi,
I've got several modules which grab installer files from a network
share. The share is readonly and as well protected as possibly.
But still, I have a bad feeling about it and would like to introduce
an extra layer of security. Like checking the md5sum of the file
before running the installe
On Friday, February 14, 2014 3:55:29 PM UTC+1, Felix.Frank wrote:
On 02/14/2014 03:52 PM, zerozer...@gmail.com wrote:
> > File <| (tag == "myname::myclass") and (tag == "post_exec") |>
>
> While this looks sane, this syntax is not yet supported. Your collectors
> must use trivial expressions
On 02/14/2014 03:52 PM, zerozerouno...@gmail.com wrote:
> File <| (tag == "myname::myclass") and (tag == "post_exec") |>
While this looks sane, this syntax is not yet supported. Your collectors
must use trivial expressions of the form "a == b".
Sorry, cheers,
Felix
--
You received this messag
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 4:23:27 PM UTC+1, jcbollinger wrote:
I think so. This looks related to
> https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-1045. Moreover, resources get
> automatic tags that may support what you're after even easier than what
> you're trying to do. For example, this m
On Friday, February 14, 2014 4:10:55 AM UTC-6, zerozer...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> On Thursday, February 13, 2014 4:18:52 PM UTC+1, Max Hoopmann wrote:
>
>
>> But now I want to do this via the foreman UI. I can create a new
>> provisioning template connect it with the correct OS and environment, b
If you need information from the client, then you should think 'facter'.
Or you could write a custom fact, or use external facts.
http://puppetlabs.com/blog/facter-1-7-introduces-external-facts
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/custom_facts.html
HTH
Jo
On 02/14/2014 12:18 AM, Ray wrote:
New
I've taken over a puppet 2.7 setup that does not use a puppet master - we
just use puppet-apply on locally stored manifests. I'm trying to
re-organise our manifests, and want to avoid changing things
unintentionally.
Since manifests are compiled into a catalog before they are applied, I'm
h
Newbie question:
I need to be able to apply a specific template based on whether a string is
found in an
existing file on the client or not. I tried the following (found an example
somewhere... it does not work.. always falls into the first condition)
What would be the correct way to check fo
Hi John
Thanks a lot. I misunderstood 'arguments' as an array of elements rather
than array of 'arguments'.
Cheers
Kashif
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 3:33:26 PM UTC, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 7:21:30 AM UTC-6, kashif wrote:
>>
>> I have written a small cu
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 4:23:27 PM UTC+1, jcbollinger wrote:
I think so. This looks related to
> https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-1045.
>
Uhm… thanks! So the problem is that defaults only apply when the specified
attributes are empty for the affected resources; but some tags ar
Hi,
We're not using passenger.
It's working, but not quite what you would call stable, still see this in
the logs sometimes -
Feb 11 11:22:26 xxx01 puppet-agent[2135]: (/Firewall[030 ALL - ACCEPT
all to localhost]/ensure) created
Feb 11 11:22:26 xxx01 puppet-agent[2135]: (/Firewall[01
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 4:18:52 PM UTC+1, Max Hoopmann wrote:
> But now I want to do this via the foreman UI. I can create a new
> provisioning template connect it with the correct OS and environment, but
> when I do a puppetrun in the browser with the foreman UI nothing happens.
> Eve
Hello,
did anyone get augeas working on current SLES releases without messing up
the system.
What i find on OBS brings a lot of dependencys and conflicts.
its jus one small ruby binding to libaugeas - shouldn't be to hard guys
thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
27 matches
Mail list logo
