That issue should be fixed "soon", I'm told. The reports do get sent to
puppetboard, but the report processor throws an unhandled exception
because it references one of the 'metrics' hash fields, which is empty
in failed reports (this should be fixed in master to log an error
message instead). Howe
One correction: It was brought to our attention that the announcement
referenced OpenSSL CVE-2013-6449. That was incorrect. The correct advisory
is CVE-2013-6550, for more information, see
http://puppetlabs.com/security/cve/cve-2013-6450.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Rob Braden wrote:
> Dea
Greetings,
I am trying to puppetize a process that goes like this:
1) remove package a.i386
2) create repo file
3) install package a.x86_64 from repo
4) update config_file_1
5) update config_file_2
6) update config_file_3
7) start service
Shouldn't be too hard right? Except I have played with ever
/etc/debian_version is in place and facter on the box returns correctly.
If I run the puppetmaster in debug I can see it checking hiera for RedHat
not Debian values as it does when another debian client contacts it.
On Thursday, January 30, 2014 7:32:41 AM UTC-7, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
>
> On T
Usually package into an RPM, but not always, which installs into
something like /usr/{lib|share}/package/something.war and then create
a link to it from the tomcat webapps directory. Tomcat's autodeploy
will take care of unpacking it.
--
Later,
Darin
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Matthew Schm
Dear Puppet Enterprise Users,
Puppet Enterprise 2.8.5 is now available.
This is a bug fix release of Puppet Enterprise. All users of
Puppet Enterprise 2.8.x are encouraged to upgrade when possible to
Puppet Enterprise 2.8.5.
Puppet Enterprise 2.8.5 includes fixes to address a regression in Puppe
Dear Puppet Enterprise Users,
Puppet Enterprise 3.1.2 is now available.
This is a bug fix and security release of Puppet Enterprise. All users of
Puppet Enterprise 3.x are encouraged to upgrade when possible to
Puppet Enterprise 3.1.2
Puppet Enterprise 3.1.2 includes fixes to address a regressio
solved thank you
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 2:15:00 PM UTC-7, Vassiliy Vins wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I've created 2 files:
>
> file *test.pp* with code :
>
> class copy {
>
> file {"testfile":
> path => "/home/vassiliy/myfile",
> source => "puppet:///mpoint/client1/testfile",
> mode => '644'
> }
> }
Hi All,
The puppet and puppet user groups stand is located in the K building, on
the second floor, somewhere in the middle.
Feel free to pop by to say hello
See you @ fosdem
--
Johan De Wit
Open Source Consultant
Red Hat Certified Engineer (805008667232363)
Puppet Certified Profess
Due to the run time issue with puppet/ruby calling powershell windows
update and i could nt be able to open the zip file
http://forge.puppetlabs.com/liamjbennett/windows_autoupdate
So I am using instead registry setting to disable the auto update, any
suggestions for the below
confine :ope
We package the war into a RPM and then use an exec statement to extract the war.
Matt
On Jan 30, 2014, at 3:50 AM, PaulC wrote:
> Must admit i would be interested in seeing what other peoples approaches has
> been for this, we have been thinking about going down the route of getting
> the war
Puppi?
On 30 Jan 2014 13:52, "Andrey Kozichev" wrote:
> we used to package into rpms as well
>
>
> On 30 January 2014 11:50, PaulC wrote:
>
>> Must admit i would be interested in seeing what other peoples approaches
>> has been for this, we have been thinking about going down the route of
>> get
PuppetDB 1.6.0 final
* RC1: January 7th, 2014.
* RC2: January 14th, 2014.
* RC3: January 22nd, 2014.
* Final: January 30th, 2014.
PuppetDB 1.6.0 Downloads
Available in native package format in the pre-release repositories at:
http://yum.puppetlabs.com and http://apt.
The puppet stand is located in the K building, on the second level.
Please feel free to 'pop by' ...
see you @ fosdem
On 01/30/2014 03:48 PM, Matthias Saou wrote:
Hi,
Awesome, thanks Daniele! I have just registered for the dinner, though
I'm still not 100% sure I'll be there (there's an a
Something like managehome => false ?
On 30 Jan 2014 16:51, "David Portabella" wrote:
> again,
> it is a circular dependency.
>
> what you are saying is to first create user and then file.
> but to create the user, we need the file first also.
>
>
> On Thursday, January 30, 2014 5:31:10 PM UTC+1,
Actually, simpler than that.
Using the stdlib puppet-forge module, I can say
$homedirdir = dirname ( $userhome )
and then
exec { "mkdir-${username}":
command => "/bin/mkdir -p ${homedirdir}",
unless => "test -d ${homedirdir}",
}
When the use
hi, im still new to puppet, but from linux logic cant you just first ensure
file is there with (deployment)-group permissions -> create user (with same
group) -> change permissions
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:51 AM, David Portabella <
david.portabe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> again,
> it is a circular
again,
it is a circular dependency.
what you are saying is to first create user and then file.
but to create the user, we need the file first also.
On Thursday, January 30, 2014 5:31:10 PM UTC+1, Arpin Dominique (Nter)
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Simple :
>
>
>
> User[‘david’]->File[‘/haha’]
>
Hi,
If you want to check if a server is compliant with a defined end state,
you can set noop=true in the resources, or just run puppet in noop mode.
Regards
El 30/01/2014 16:51, "Matthew Burgess"
escribió:
>
> On 30 January 2014 15:41, Andreas Dvorak wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think the expla
For illustrating purposes,
I need a *david* user with home directory /haha/david,
and at the same time, the directory /haha also needs to be owned by *david*.
this code does not work,
because user requires the /haha directory, and the /haha directory requires
the david user,
so we have a circular
Hi,
Simple :
User[‘david’]->File[‘/haha’]
Ref: http://docs.puppetlabs.com/learning/ordering.html
Dominique Arpin
Tél. Interne: 140-4156
Tél. 514 285.2929 Poste: 140-4156
De : puppet-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:puppet-users@googlegroups.com] De la
part de David Portabella
Envoyé : 30 jan
Hi,
I am trying to install Apache with a default set of config files. I have
the following class:
class base_apache {
case $operatingsystem {
windows: {
file { 'apache_installer_package':
path=> 'D:/Downloads/Puppet/',
ensure
On 30 January 2014 15:41, Andreas Dvorak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the explaination of Gareth is wrong.
>
No, he's exactly right. And please be careful with your spelling...it's
'absent', not 'absend'. Your puppet manifests are not scripts/sets of
instructions. They define what end-state you
Hi,
I think the explaination of Gareth is wrong.
absend will uninstall a package
I am using absend to uninstall package and here is a web site about that.
http://www.puppetcookbook.com/posts/remove-package.html
Best regards
Andreas
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
Hi,
I think the explaination of Kaustubh is wrong.
absend will uninstall a package
I am using absend to uninstall package and here is a web site about that.
http://www.puppetcookbook.com/posts/remove-package.html
Best regards
Andreas
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Hi all,
I have an install routine that should never be executed by puppet
automatically.
But I would like to execute it sometimes by running something like this:
puppet agent -t --ignoreschedules --tags never
One idea is to create a schedule
class never{
schedule { 'never':
repeat => 0,
}
Hi,
Awesome, thanks Daniele! I have just registered for the dinner, though
I'm still not 100% sure I'll be there (there's an air controller strike,
argh!).
But I'll be lurking around, like (almost) every year :-)
For a photo : https://github.com/thias
I'll be mostly interested in discussing any
On Thursday, January 30, 2014 8:22:35 AM UTC-6, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
> Looking at the Facter source, however, it seems pretty likely that the
> problem revolves around the file /etc/debian_version having been removed
> from the node.
>
>
Hmm. Having re-read the problem description, I am les
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 7:16:45 PM UTC-6, Doug_F wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I have a problem where I was mucking about in a Module which failed. One
> of my Debian nodes I was testing it on started acting funky. Now my single
> Debian node is getting some weird module activity.
> Classes defi
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:00:28 PM UTC-6, Jon Jaroker wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Would anyone know what the error message "Could not set present on ensure:
> Function not implemented" means. It is appearing in Puppet 2.7.13 on a
> File resource type. The --debug flag does not give any hint
we used to package into rpms as well
On 30 January 2014 11:50, PaulC wrote:
> Must admit i would be interested in seeing what other peoples approaches
> has been for this, we have been thinking about going down the route of
> getting the war files and any relevant library files put into a rpm/d
Hi,
Thanks for the reply Richard,
I will try this and share the details!
-Kaustubh
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:13:13 PM UTC-5, Richard Berwald wrote:
>
> I recently faced the same challenge. I did not want to group by osfamily
> but by another fact.
> I came up with this solution:
> 1) re
Hi everyone,
I've booked at Sogno d’Italia for approx. 30 people. They are expecting us
somewhere between 19h00 and 19h20 (that's 7PM for the Americans).
I've changed the Eventbrite event to allow tickets up to 35 which means
there's
about 15 places left if you want to join in. So, if you want
Hi,
I am having similar issue, cant figure out why. Can any one help me with
this ??
thanks,
Teja.
On Friday, August 10, 2012 5:29:27 AM UTC-7, Axel Bock wrote:
>
> hm, nevermind, I somehow solved it. although I'm not (yet) sure how. It
> involved a lot of restarting and deleting :)
>
> thank
Here we go:
Part 1: Custom Fact (modules/users/lib/facter/user_home.rb)
require 'etc'
Etc.passwd { |user|
Facter.add("home_#{user.name}") do
setcode do
user.dir
end
end
}
When you are creating a user, you
I use puppetboard too - it's really great, and much lighter on the
database. A big improvement on puppet-dashboard.
Only one issue remains, that means I must keep my puppet-dashboard..
There's a bug in the puppetdb-terminus - so nodes which manifest fails
compilation fails - does NOT get a repo
Greetings,
Thanks for the response.
The pkginventory is already doing this inside of util/pkg.rb:
rpm -qa --qf %{NAME}"\t"%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}
I am fully aware of how multiple kernels work. As stated, the kernel was
just an example. I need/want every package installed returned to me and the
v
Must admit i would be interested in seeing what other peoples approaches
has been for this, we have been thinking about going down the route of
getting the war files and any relevant library files put into a rpm/deb
package and getting puppet to install the rpm though the OS package manager.
Pa
You can change the path to authorized_keys as it is done in my ssh puppet
module (http://forge.puppetlabs.com/thbe/ssh). The next version of this
module will give you the possibility to deploy usernames with keys as
parameters but I'm not sure when I'll find time to implement this. Till now
you hav
Am 30.01.2014 08:05, schrieb Dirk Heinrichs:
> Am 29.01.2014 17:27, schrieb Simon Hildrew:
>
>> Can you raise an issue on the github project
>> at https://github.com/sihil/hiera-eyaml-gpg with details on how you
>> produced the error?
>
> Sure.
https://github.com/sihil/hiera-eyaml-gpg/issues/11
B
40 matches
Mail list logo
