Puppet 3.2.1-rc1 is a bugfix release candidate for the 3.x series of Puppet.
This release addresses two major issues that were uncovered in 3.2.0
and caused us to pull that release (#20726 and #20742). It also
includes a fix for Solaris support (#19760).
Downloads are available at:
* Source http
On 17/05/13 03:45 AM, sjr wrote:
> I have done a quick&dirty hack to the APT provider and it works when
> installing a new package I can enforce a version and hold it. But from
> my minor mod to a proper patch...there is still much work to do, so
> that's why I was looking for comments, opinions, a
Hey Folks,
I am looking at using puppet to help manage/coordinate system integration
among several teams collaborating on an appliance product.This is a
little different than other environments where I've used puppet for
managing large numbers of systems. In the appliance case, we need
Hahaha, I didn't even think about that, I just copied the script blindly
from out EC2 setup, that'll teach me
I'll test it out on Monday morning and update
If that is the answer: thanks in advance
Tom
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users"
Tom,
Why are installing the EL 6 release package for Fedora 18? Have you
tried
http://yum.puppetlabs.com/fedora/f18/products/i386/puppetlabs-release-18-7.noarch.rpm
instead?
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Tom Poulton wrote:
> I setup the Puppet Labs yum repo via "sudo rpm -ivh
> http://yum.pup
I setup the Puppet Labs yum repo via "sudo rpm -ivh
http://yum.puppetlabs.com/el/6/products/i386/puppetlabs-release-6-6.noarch.rpm
"
So far between me and a colleague we've tried:
F18 GNOME:
Seemed fine I think (but GNOME 3 didn't play nice with VirtualBox, very
very slow)
F18 KDE: Initially runn
I've narrowed the error down to puppet mishandling the parsing of my
function.
I am using the aws-sdk in my custom function and I can connect fine, but as
soon as I try to iterate or filter an EC2InstanceCollection, thats when I
get the "wrong header line format" error on the node.
E.g:
ec2 =
Hi All,
I've run into a bit of a tangle.
I currently have two puppet masters which are "load balanced" with round
robin DNS (one is also the CA). I'm using dns_alt_names to let them each
answer to puppet.my.domain.com
For the past year this has been fine.
About a week ago I tried to add a thi
Actually before taking the db dump i ran "rm -rf /var/lib/mysql/*...
It looks like this may have messed it up...
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 2:00 PM, pdiddy wrote:
> I did follow below mentioned link, however i'm still getting the same
> error while restoring the database...
>
> puppet-dashboard@lx
Between tagging 3.2.0 final and actually releasing it, a bug was
discovered in the user provider related to managehome on redhat based
systems (https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/20726). Rather than
ship 3.2.0 with that bug, we're readying Puppet 3.2.1 for a fresh rc
series to address this issu
I did follow below mentioned link, however i'm still getting the same error
while restoring the database...
puppet-dashboard@lxpuppet:~$ rake RAILS_ENV=production
FILE=/serversoftware/yum/puppet-db.sql db:raw:restore --trace
(in /opt/puppet/share/puppet-dashboard)
** Invoke db:raw:restore (firs
hi,
I have upgraded puppet from 2.7 to 3.0 and reinstalled puppetdb and
converted the new certs to truststore.jks and keystore.jks under the
correct directory.
I am using activeMq with mcollective
below is
puppet.conf
[main]
logdir = /var/log/puppet
rundir = /var/run/pupp
I have made selected facts items in our monitor (zabbix), mostly for use in
monitoring, ex. how many proc's influences what is high load, but this also
makes the history available in the monitor.
It's a one-liner zabbix.conf line
UserParameter=local.fact[*],facter $1
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1
Hi all
is there a way to keep a history of facts for a given node, other than
taking a periodic snapshot of the inventory service?
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
Thank you Keith and John. I realize what I'm doing is an edge case and it
is something I will rarely use. I'll copy the assets to the clients and
use the apply function.
On Friday, May 17, 2013 7:01:38 AM UTC-6, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, May 16, 2013 3:38:23 PM UTC-5, Nev wrote:
Agreed. This is a much cleaner approach to the problem.
“Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in
the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.”
Bill Waterson (Calvin & Hobbes)
- Original Message -
From: "David Schmitt"
To: puppet-users@goo
On 17.05.2013 16:12, Peter Krawetzky wrote:
Was wondering if someone has implemented the management of multiple
MySQL instances using puppet on the same server? Essentially we want to
use the same MySQL binaries but implement multiple distinct MySQL
instances connecting via a specific port numbe
Should be easy to do, just no one has yet to share their module code.
This would require customizing both the configuration and the puppet-service
implementation.
I have done this (not with puppet) on Red Hat/CentOS type systems by making
duplicate startup scripts in /etc/init.d :
/etc/init.d/
> I am not sure I did the ssl-setup command again. I started all over
> again on the puppetdb. Deleted the package, all the logs and
> configuration and reinstalled puppetdb. I included a complete output:
> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=TDejFAvp
>
> Does this make things more clear? I did a clean i
Hi,
On 17.05.2013 15:28, wernerbahlke wrote:
I have to change a file in c:\Program Files
\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp\v4.0. I have tried various ways to encapsule
the Windows path with spaces but to no avail.
The following
file { "\"c:\\program files
\\MSBuild\\Microsoft.Cpp\\v4.0\\Microsoft.Cpp
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 4:53:28 PM UTC-5, Schofield wrote:
>
> I am developing a custom provider and have a requirement on a gem. Is
> there any way to use the gem with a custom provider without installing the
> gem on the managed node? Ideally I want to keep the gem isolated from
> other
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:10:44 PM UTC-5, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> When writing modules are people namespacing them to avoid collisions
> with puppetlabs' modules?
>
Typically not.
>
> I wrote some (very simple) modules:
>
> mysql
> postgresql
>
> that now have name
Was wondering if someone has implemented the management of multiple MySQL
instances using puppet on the same server? Essentially we want to use the
same MySQL binaries but implement multiple distinct MySQL instances
connecting via a specific port number. Puppet Forge has a great MySQL
impleme
Hello Gav and Meiji,
I tried all the above.. still it doesn't solve my issue any further
suggestion?
my output when I run "puppet device --verbose"
# puppet device --verbose
info: starting applying configuration to sw1 at telnet://10.0.0.1/
info: Creating a new SSL key for sw1
err: Could not re
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 10:34:26 PM UTC-5, Pete wrote:
>
> On 17 May 2013 13:05, joe > wrote:
>
>> The easiest thing to do would to make a subclass called cups::enabled or
>> similar and use an override:
>>
>> class cups::enabled inherits cups{ # The inherits is important
>>
>> Package['cup
My preference would be either to use the same master, maybe with some
additional environments, or commission a master for the development
environment...
That way, you can be more confident that what works in dev will work in prod
:-)
Gav
--
You received this message because you are subscr
I have to change a file in c:\Program Files
\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp\v4.0. I have tried various ways to encapsule
the Windows path with spaces but to no avail.
The following
file { "\"c:\\program files
\\MSBuild\\Microsoft.Cpp\\v4.0\\Microsoft.CppCommon.targets\"":
ensure => pr
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 3:38:23 PM UTC-5, Nev wrote:
>
> I need to be able to run a certain class ONLY when it is called
> manually from the client.
>
> I created a class named "manual" and can run it from the client like
> this:
>
> puppet agent --no-daemonize --onetime --verbose --tags=ma
Hi Ken,
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Ken Barber wrote:
> I think the certificate fingerprint issue you received is a worry, but
> might not indicate a problem per se. Lets use openssl instead to get
> the fingerprint directly:
Still get this problem.
> # openssl x509 -noout -in `puppet mast
masterless is an another good approach, but it prompt another issue, I
don't want to QA guys see any sensitive configuration belong to production.
to do masterless puppet, all modules should be copy to client which include
some information exclusive to production.
在 2013年5月14日星期二UTC+8上午11时28分04
Due to upgrading to Debian 7 Wheezy , I choose to rebuilt our puppet setup.
Now all went well except that I have one issue , changes made via puppet
dashboard do not get pushed to the client.
I have used the APT repository from puppetlabs to install all the servers
and clients.
I can run puppe
it's interesting, thanks a lot.
On 5月14日, 下午10时09分, Keiran Sweet wrote:
> Regarding Masterless Puppet, Sam Bashton spoke about his approach to
> Masterless Puppet at Puppetconf London a few months ago.
>
> You can see his slides
> here:http://www.slideshare.net/PuppetLabs/bashton-masterless-pup
Hi Grabriel,
yes, that's the point ... it's not currently possible so I wanted to know
what the community is doing for overcoming this "problem" ... and whether
it could be a useful feature.
I have done a quick&dirty hack to the APT provider and it works when
installing a new package I can enf
33 matches
Mail list logo
