Seems to me that the default puppet enterprise 2.6.1 setup often fails to run
its assigned classes at the
level set in runinterval in puppet.conf in the master/agent sections (mine has
runinterval = 180 in both.)
When running manually puppet agent -t, all is just fine, but the out-of-the-box
2.
I was able to get around this with a puppet deinstall/reinstall with
purge/delete and a mysql deinstall/reinstall
with a rename of the /var/lib/mysql directory. I can only guess that the
modes/permissions were to blame
but I didn't have time to dig into it.
On Oct 14, 2012, at 2:49 PM, Stuart C
On Saturday, October 13, 2012 8:23:57 AM UTC-7, Paul Belanger wrote:
> On Friday, October 12, 2012 10:10:54 AM UTC-4, windowsrefund wrote:
>>
>> Recently, there have been some changes made to the Puppetlabs website
>> which result in the free software releases being difficult to locate and
>> do
I am getting a truckload of errors:
notice: /File[/var/opt/lib/pe-puppet/lib/puppet/provider/file_line]:
Dependency File[/var/opt/lib/pe-pupet/lib] has failures: true
warning: /File[/var/opt/lib/pe-puppet/lib/puppet/provider/file_line]:
Skipping because of failed dependencies
Has anyone see
On 10/14/2012 08:53 PM, Felipe Salum wrote:
I would love to see puppet forge as we have the distribution
repositories.. Modules audited, tested and maybe fixed by PuppetLabs and
then officially released on puppet forge under the puppetlabs account.
I see some scenarios that puppetlabs could cons
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Felipe Salum wrote:
> I would love to see puppet forge as we have the distribution
> repositories.. Modules audited, tested and maybe fixed by PuppetLabs and
> then officially released on puppet forge under the puppetlabs account.
Today, you're right. Forge is
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:53:41AM -0700, Felipe Salum wrote:
>I would love to see puppet forge as we have the distribution
>repositories.. Modules audited, tested and maybe fixed
(SNIP)
Sounds like you just volunteered.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
I would love to see puppet forge as we have the distribution repositories..
Modules audited, tested and maybe fixed by PuppetLabs and then officially
released on puppet forge under the puppetlabs account.
I see some scenarios that puppetlabs could consider:
1. puppetlabs is taking a lot of time
On 24/09/12 19:03, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to add an entry to /etc/hosts.allow only if the entry for
> 'client' (daemon) does not already exit.
>
> In this #puppet log:
> http://www.puppetlogs.com/puppet/%23puppet-2012-05-03.log.html
>
> rodjek links a gist which should do
On 10/14/2012 04:20 PM, Jakov Sosic wrote:
On 10/14/2012 03:01 PM, Stefan Schulte wrote:
If you use "ensurable", puppet will expect the provider to have an
exists? method and if that returns true your create method will not be
called so you do not have to check the existance in the create method
Everyone had ever used the puppet forge know this. The forge today are
collection of modules, with a different degree of quality. But this
quality is not enforced by a external authority, there is not any
review. Think about it : it is a forge. Like sf.net for some open
source software, some projec
On 10/14/2012 03:01 PM, Stefan Schulte wrote:
If you use "ensurable", puppet will expect the provider to have an
exists? method and if that returns true your create method will not be
called so you do not have to check the existance in the create method
again.
But then I would have to change al
Good Afternoon All,
I'm just pondering - I think that my expectations of the forge are not 100%
aligned, or I'm still rubbish with puppet!
I imagine the forge to be used in the following scenario/way
I'm in a situation where I need to provision package X in a particular way. I
fire up my termi
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:52:49PM +0200, Jakov Sosic wrote:
> On 10/13/2012 11:17 PM, Stefan Schulte wrote:
> > If puppet has to sync ensure it will not sync any other property. That
> > means if your type defines "ensurable" or you have defined an ensure
> > property manually and your system is n
On 10/14/2012 08:40 AM, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
I would certainly +1 this method! I was bitten by the puppet 3.x
packages for 2 reasons. The first one is that in my kickstart configs, I
have "puppet" specified as a package which gets installed during
installation and performs some trickery to run
15 matches
Mail list logo
