Hello Puppeteers,
one problem we stumble upon quite often is duplicate definition of
resources. For instance we install the package git-core in our base-
class every node is in. Now we want to use a module from github, e.g.
https://github.com/uggedal/puppet-module-git, but this one also
defines th
On Mar 5, 2012 3:36 PM, "Kinzel, David" wrote:
> It would be much simpler to use:
>
> onlyif => "net ads testjoin 2>&1 | grep 'Join is OK'"
>
> Which will use the return code of grep.
Idk the onlyif interface offhand but you probably want a -q on the grep to
suppress output. So,
grep -q 'Join is
Thanks for the replies, I can see that there is no "easy" setup to allow
what I'm looking for :-( I will be looking a bit more on the External Node
Classifier to see if this will solve my problem.
We will be using puppet to fully automate everything that has to be
performed on servers, so I wil
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 12:26:24PM -0800, Adam wrote:
> Trying to set up a puppet module that runs through most of my samba/
> domain joining steps. I have an exec statement where I run my "net
> ads join -U %" command. I would like to
> include an additional test statement where the command runs
I do check_mk configuration and Netbackup work via this method.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:57 PM, windowsrefund wrote:
>
> This is exactly how I handle things.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send em
I'm not sure how much membership-specific code you have, but if it's
more than just this you may want a custom fact rather than using
unless/onlyif every time. We use QAS instead of Samba for domain
membership but the idea is the same:
--vas_status.rb--
require 'facter'
vastool = '/opt/quest/bi
This is exactly how I handle things.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
F
Folks,
I haven't tried this yet, but I certainly intend to.
If I set up an exported file definition such that:
@@file{'munin-node-file':
content=> template('blah'),
path => "/etc/munin.d/${hostname}.cfg"
}
and then
File << 'munin-node-file' >>
Do I understand correctly t
Hi,
Here's what the docs say:
"Okay, we can pass parameters into classes now and change their behavior.
Great! But classes are still always singletons; you can’t declare more than one
copy and get two different sets of behavior simultaneously. And you’ll
eventually want to do that! What if you
>exec {
> path => "/usr/bin",
> onlyif => 'test `net ads testjoin 2>&1 | grep Join | sed -e \'s/
>*Join is OK*/1/g\' -ne 1'
> command => 'net ads join -U %
>createcomputer="Samba"
>}
>
>The onlyif doesn't work if the result of the testjoin returns "Join is
>OK", depending on the test sy
So, many moons ago, the following used to work:
require 'puppet'
Puppet::Parser::Functions::function(:mangle_ip_address)
s = Puppet::Parser::Scope.new
# Mask the ipaddress variable
s.setvar('ipaddress','11.22.33.44')
s.mangle_ip_address
However, now that we have to call 'lookupvar' in our functi
Trying to set up a puppet module that runs through most of my samba/
domain joining steps. I have an exec statement where I run my "net
ads join -U %" command. I would like to
include an additional test statement where the command runs only if it
hasn't already been joined to the domain yet; howe
I apologize if this horse has already been beaten to death, but I'm
new here and very, very confused. I'm just starting to work with
Puppet and I can not make heads or tails of the language: specifically
how to use parameterized classes. I've spent a week reading the docs
and testing manifests and
So, we use storconfigs (thin) in our environment and recetly start to
see thw following issue:
First of all we use thin storeconfigs, and the only thing we really
use it for currently is ssh keys, however we plan on using ti for
nagios at some point.
In our shop (HPC), we frequently rebuild hosts
Dear Puppeteers,
After many hours of reading manuals, books and google, I'm starting to thing
there is no right way to edit files in puppet, and I must be wrong. A massive
work is ahead (puppetizing our whole cluster) and I would like to start with
the right foot.
My idea is to make puppet a t
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Matthew Nicholson
wrote:
> Furthermore I can verify the cert client side w/ the ca:
>
> root::wave { 10:34:20 Fri Mar 02 }
> ~-> openssl verify -CAfile /var/lib/puppet/ssl/certs/ca.pem
> /var/lib/puppet/ssl/certs/wave.pem
> /var/lib/puppet/ssl/certs/wave.pem: OK
My
On Mar 2, 2012, at 5:19 PM, Russell Van Tassell wrote:
> The gem includes everything you will need... the (basic) difference is simply
> running "puppet agent" versus "puppet master" -- some packages just hide the
> simplicity (probably a legacy thing?).
>
> Note: I do not believe things like
I am. I run ours on a 1GB RAM VM with 2 vCPUs. We manage about 500 Linux
servers, each checking in every 30 mins. It's pretty much idle, though I'm
gradually rolling out our modules so our catalog currently compiles fast.
I'm using Webrick, and plan on moving to Passenger/Apache whenever it
starts
Hi,
yesterday I published some ideas about improving the reusability of chef
cookbooks on my blog. As I don't consider this issue chef-specific, you
might be interested in this as well:
http://blog.nistu.de/2012/03/04/reusability-in-configuration-management-systems/
I would love to discuss these
On Mar 4, 4:47 am, Eslam Mamdouh wrote:
> $replicas works now by replacing
>
> <% if has_variable?(scope.lookupvar('class_name::params::replicas')) then %>
>
> with
>
> > <% if has_variable?("class_name::params::replicas") then %>
>
> but the problem now with $dbhost variable "else condition"
>
On Mar 2, 2:12 pm, Romeo Theriault wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 08:56, Romeo Theriault
> wrote:
> > [...] one item I can't seem to find a clean way of dealing
> > with is one-off nodes. For example, let's say I want to apply a class
> > called zabbix::agent to my whole infrastructure, so I
Hi,
> Try using %x{} instead of system. The system() function returns the
> return code of the process, not the output.
> irb> %x{hostname --fqdn}.chomp
> => "dagon.fnord.no"
That worked, thanks!
For the record, this is how it looks like:
$new_ip=inline_template("<%= %x{host $hostname|awk '
Sounds like a great idea, but I am still trying to get a basic understanding of
just puppet and hiera. I really like the idea of separating the. ode unique
data from the general manifest, but I would like to see a beginner's guide to
puppet/hiera. The other piece that I am very interested in i
"pablo.fernan...@cscs.ch" writes:
> Do you know what am I doing wrong? How do I capture the system()
> output?
Try using %x{} instead of system. The system() function returns the
return code of the process, not the output.
Oh, and "chomp" the extra whitespace off the output. If you're new to
r
Dear Puppet users,
I'm quite new to Puppet, and I know less about ruby. That's probably
why I have this question, hopefully you could answer it. I have
google'd quite a lot about it, without success:
I install nodes on a private subnet, and they get their FQDN from a
local DHCP server, so the $ho
On Monday, March 5, 2012 12:23:52 PM UTC+1, Krzysztof Wilczynski wrote:
>
> I would imagine, that adding code to either ignore SIGCHLD, or collect
> child status (exit code), or use Process.detach could help :-)
>
> How and what in the what what now?
--
You received this message because you a
Hi,
So /bin/sh gets defunc on Retrieving plugin.. What's my next step?
>
I would imagine, that adding code to either ignore SIGCHLD, or collect
child status (exit code), or use Process.detach could help :-)
KW
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pupp
Ok, it fails at early run.
Mar 5 03:57:33 srzarnsas007 puppet-agent[22690]: Retrieving plugin
Mar 5 03:57:35 srzarnsas007 puppet-agent[22690]: Loading facts in
/var/lib/puppet/lib/facter/facter_dot_d.rb
Mar 5 03:57:35 srzarnsas007 puppet-agent[22690]: Loading facts in
/var/lib/puppet/lib/fact
hi, all:
i want to require my own ruby class in a custom function, now i put the
ruby file in the same directory with custom function, and require it in the
function file like this:
require File.join([File.expand_path(File.dirname(__FILE__)), 'test.rb'])
but i think this is too ugly, is there a
This happed to concern the LVM module, but I don't think that is important in
this case.
What is the difference between using -> and => to enforce a requirement that
one class cannot be applied if the other fails to be asserted?
In this case I have:-
mount { "/addon/work2" :
Hi all,
Over the weekend I came up with a new backend for hiera for looking up
configuration values directly from a MySQL database that may be useful
to some
http://www.craigdunn.org/2012/03/introducing-hiera-mysql-mysql-backend-for-hiera/
http://github.com/crayfishx/hiera-mysql
Regard
31 matches
Mail list logo
