Hey Folks,
I just updated my puppet master to 2.6.6. As part of the update, I moved my
puppet-master under Passenger.
ruby-1.8.7p249
rack-1.2.1
passenger-2.2.15
puppet-2.6.6 ( the clients are all 2.6.0 currently )
Ubuntu 10.04.{1,2} LTS
In doing so, I am now seeing the behavior outlined in:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:37:42AM +1000, Ian Mortimer wrote:
> The service in this case is ypbind but it could apply to other
> services. The problem is that `service ypbind status' returns 0
> if the service is running even if it's not bound to the domain.
Is there no reason you can't just mak
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:55:20AM -0800, Maciej Skrzetuski wrote:
> Any ideas on this? How can I do both, copy files recursively and then
> change some subdirectory permissions?
This, I believe (and I'm happy to be corrected), is due to the fix of
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/2296
To
The short answer is: it sucks to be you.
The longer answer is that variables are really rvalues: they are something
that you can read and test, but they are not function calls or otherwise
subject to evaluation. When you write
Cron <| tag == "a" |>
in your manifest, you are evaluating an == expre
Hi All
I have a bit of a strange one, and am not sure I'm doing this right. This is
with 2.6.4 on Solaris 10
We want to create a sym link from a source file that is created by a
package. If the package isn't installed, puppet in noop is registering an
error (big red in the dashboard) because it c
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 00:51, Avleen Vig wrote:
> I spun up an instance of Ubuntu 10.10 in EC2 tonight and installed
> puppet, for the purpose of testing mongodb. Ubuntu ships with Puppet
> 2.6.1
[…]
> I believe this is caused by the following code in /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/
> puppet/provider/packag
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 08:00, cyrus wrote:
> Every now and then I get the following error on a Puppet run:
>
> Mon Feb 28 21:19:04 -0700 2011 Puppet (err): Could not retrieve
> catalog from remote server: Error 400 on SERVER: invalid value for
> Integer: "eNp1VtmS6jgSfZ+v0NTDRHczgHfAEf0ABgw2i9kNLx
Actually, it is worse than that: it is "libc, as used by Ruby, as used
by Puppet"; we are several layers abstracted from the NSS data source,
and if that doesn't dynamically update we are totally stuck. Which I
understand to be the root cause here.
Regards,
Daniel
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:4
…and now it is. :)
On a more serious note, if that doesn't resolve your problem, please
file a ticket with us so we can work to track it down. We do think
these are very, very important problems, and would like to eliminate
the last of them from our system.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Tue, Mar 8, 201
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:52, Felix Frank
wrote:
> On 03/10/2011 02:31 PM, Vincent wrote:
>> I execute one script hourly, this script create an output file that I
>> need to push on another server
>> As puppet can pass our fw I would like to use it as file transfert.
>
> Hmm...I don't think this
Hi
The service in this case is ypbind but it could apply to other
services. The problem is that `service ypbind status' returns 0
if the service is running even if it's not bound to the domain.
Replacing hasstatus with `status => "/usr/bin/ypwhich"' doesn't
fix it either because puppet will then
Actually, I was hoping you'd run it standalone so that the the other stuff
wouldn't interfere.
On Mar 10, 2011, at 1:25 PM, Stefan Baryakov wrote:
> yep. I'll send you the result tomorrow. Note that the real setup is
> with 2.6.4 with external node classifier and myfile and myuser are in
> separ
I have an array like this:
$items = [ "a", "-b" ]
That should generate something like this (let's say for the Cron
resource:
Cron <| (tag == "a" or title == "a") and (tag != "b" or title != "b") |
>
The reason is because we are grouping sets of virtual resources with
tags to be realized (as a w
Jon,
Thanks for the input. I'll have to talk with my team, but it looks
like keeping those service-users in the package (RPM, in our case) is
the way to go.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:44 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 4:05 pm, Liberty Young wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> My company has been successful
yep. I'll send you the result tomorrow. Note that the real setup is
with 2.6.4 with external node classifier and myfile and myuser are in
separate modules
Regards,
Stefan
On Mar 10, 10:13 pm, Patrick wrote:
> I'm almost sure this isn't true could you put just that into a "test.pp" file
> and ru
I'm almost sure this isn't true could you put just that into a "test.pp" file
and run that in master-less mode to check?
In 0.25.x this would be "puppet --verbose --debug test.pp"
In 2.6.x I think this would be "puppet apply --verbose --debug test.pp"
Note: this is run on the client.
On Mar 10,
Thanks for the response.
What is the scope of "if myresource exists" part? From what I can tell
it looks also in modules which are not included for given node.
In my example
Modules:
class myuser {user {"myuser": homedir => /someplace } }
class myfile { file {"myfile": owner => "myuser" }}
node
On Mar 10, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Stefan Baryakov wrote:
> The problem is that if you mention that user in some resource, lets
> say file{owner}, the class managing that user gets included form the
> auto-require even though it is not included by the external node
> classifier.
Auto-require won't in
Hi out there,
Is there a good way to avoid auto-requiring of resources that are in
modules, which are not included for a given node?
Here is an example - there is a definition of a user, lets say a
service service account, which is present on all nodes for given
environment and some property of t
I would like to add that I have no errors from puppetd when running it
in test mode, so that's strange.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this
Hello everybody,
I have a strange problem. I manage a directory recursively like this
(this part works).
class showcase {
file { "/opt/files":
ensure => directory,
owner => "user",
group => "group",
recurse => true,
source => "puppet:///showcase"
}
}
Now, if I want to set
Hi,
I have following config to replace files in a directory and back them
up in filebucket. However, the files are getting backed up in
filebucket on the client (/var/lib/puppet/clientbucket) itself.
Am I missing anything here? Following is the config that I have:
# ### cat /etc/puppet/manifest
On Mar 9, 6:20 am, Nick Moffitt wrote:
> I recently found myself needing to perform a similar task to that
> desired by Udo Waechter in:
>
> https://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users/browse_thread/thread/ea6...
>
> Namely, I would like a file to exist on machine A iff any or all of
> machines
On 10-03-11 14:39, Martijn Grendelman wrote:
> but the error remains.
>
> Pointers still very much appreciated!!
I am very sorry for the noise. The error was the result of a patch that I
recently added to my Puppetmaster, to allow Nagios_* parameters to be
specified as arrays. Stupid.
Best regar
On Mar 9, 4:05 pm, Liberty Young wrote:
> Hi!
>
> My company has been successfully using puppet 2.6 for a month now, and
> we are now exploring the possibility of managing users and groups
> through puppet (vs LDAP). If we were to implement managing
> users/groups for various services (e.g. 'www'
On Mar 7, 2011, at 7:06 PM, LarsP wrote:
> I was told recently at a Puppet workshop that using LDAP for managing node
> information is not advised. Anybody care to comment? What is it about using
> LDAP that's not a good idea?
I’ve never heard this. I hope it’s not true because you’ll have to p
On 03/10/2011 02:31 PM, Vincent wrote:
> I execute one script hourly, this script create an output file that I
> need to push on another server
> As puppet can pass our fw I would like to use it as file transfert.
>
> Vincent
Hmm...I don't think this is a good idea. Puppet isn't really designed
f
Hello,
I am trying to configure a new puppet server on Debian Squeeze, so the
server version will be 2.6.2-4.
I am trying to configure a client running Lenny, the puppet version is
0.25.4-2
I declare the new client with the command :
#puppetd --server puppet.domain.tld --waitforcert 60 --test
o
Hi,
>>> Yesterday I implemented a module for managing Nagios configurations. It
>>> has turned out to be quite a complex beast, but in my test environment, it
>>> seemed to do everything it should.
>>>
>>> Now, in production, managing some 30 hosts, I get the following on the
>>> node that is both
I execute one script hourly, this script create an output file that I
need to push on another server
As puppet can pass our fw I would like to use it as file transfert.
Vincent
On Mar 10, 2:26 pm, Felix Frank
wrote:
> Please elaborate further. How much output are we talking about and what
> is
Please elaborate further. How much output are we talking about and what
is to happen with it?
The canonical way to go about this is deploying custom facts on your
clients, which the puppetmaster uses then.
Regards,
Felix
On 03/10/2011 01:49 PM, Vincent wrote:
> So I need to retrieve the output o
On Mar 10, 8:26 am, Mark Phillips wrote:
>
> http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#markp
Version up now contains latest pkgutil provider from
https://github.com/gw42/puppet/blob/tickets%2Fmaster%2F4258-dev/lib/puppet/provider/package/pkgutil.rb
and this bug fix from Dom Cleal https://pro
Hi,
On 10-03-11 13:46, Martijn Grendelman wrote:
>> Yesterday I implemented a module for managing Nagios configurations. It
>> has turned out to be quite a complex beast, but in my test environment, it
>> seemed to do everything it should.
>>
>> Now, in production, managing some 30 hosts, I get th
So I need to retrieve the output of somes scripts running on many
clients
Must I configure a puppet server on each nodes ?
On Mar 10, 12:37 pm, vincent wrote:
> What is the best way to retrieve files on clients ?
>
> Vincent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
On 10-03-11 12:49, Martijn Grendelman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I implemented a module for managing Nagios configurations. It
> has turned out to be quite a complex beast, but in my test environment, it
> seemed to do everything it should.
>
> Now, in production, managing some 30 hosts, I get th
Hi,
Yesterday I implemented a module for managing Nagios configurations. It
has turned out to be quite a complex beast, but in my test environment, it
seemed to do everything it should.
Now, in production, managing some 30 hosts, I get the following on the
node that is both Puppetmaster and Nagio
What is the best way to retrieve files on clients ?
Vincent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr
There was an email thread mentioning this a few months ago, but I
can't find it now. Did find this open bug report:
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4514
2.6.x clients can upload reports to Dashboard 1.0.4, but it's not
fully functioning. If you've still got some old 2.5 clients around it
pr
C
On Mar 9, 3:59 pm, Luke Bigum wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't have a Dashboard (or Puppet!) on hand at the
> moment, but are you all using Puppet version 2.6.x? The format of the
> reports has changed and some functionality isn't compatible such as a
> the graph images of a node's Puppet running
On 10 Mar 2011, at 04:24, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Jacob Helwig wrote:
>> This maintenance release fixes two issues with Puppet 2.6.5.
>
> For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
>
>http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
I'll pop a test 2.6.6 for OpenCSW up la
40 matches
Mail list logo
