Re: [Puppet Users] Application / database deployment coordination

John Warburton wrote: > On 29 January 2011 07:27, Pete Ehlke > wrote: > > Question: is the sort of orchestration that I seem to need something > that can be approached in puppet, or would I be better off slicing > this application out to a different automation

Re: [Puppet Users] Application / database deployment coordination

On 29 January 2011 07:27, Pete Ehlke wrote: > Question: is the sort of orchestration that I seem to need something that > can be approached in puppet, or would I be better off slicing this > application out to a different automation platform? > > Orchestration outside of the client isn't puppet's

[Puppet Users] Data/Model Separation: Design Proposal

We've concluded the Google Docs experiment, and it didn't really scale in terms of commentary. After feedback, we decided to use Redmine to track design proposals and feedback, so here is the new location. http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/6079 This is an important problem for us all to sol

RE: [Puppet Users] RE: each clients classes.txt on the server

Thank you Brian. Would you mind sharing the code for your custom fact that reads in /var/lib/puppet/classes.txt and presents it as a csv fact value. This would really save me some time as I am not a ruby developer. From: puppet-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:puppet-users@googlegroups.com] On Be

[Puppet Users] Run stages implicitly include classes, is this behavior intended?

So I am using a mix of old puppet and the Ruby DSL on a new project (loving it, new as it is!). But I've run into some behavior that surprised me. In my default node, (.pp), I have, among others, these lines: node "default" { class { 'amqp': stage => system } include roles } (It seems that w