[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet via Passenger+Apache2 on Ubuntu /certificate_revocation_list/ca 403 error

2010-08-13 Thread Yushu
Just to add: in the puppet masterlog it shows below. What causes the "Could not resolve 192.168.2.3: no name for 192.168.2.3" ? I'm running inside Eucalyptus, where the domainname is strange. Also, with exactly the same configuration/certs, if I run puppetmasterd directly, it works fine. Thanks

Re: [Puppet Users] Question about types and using a default/inherited value

2010-08-13 Thread Avi Miller
Hi Chris, On 14/08/2010, at 8:48 AM, Christopher Johnston wrote: > Since some of them all use the same options (user, group, mode, etc) with the > same values is there a way to set them globally once and have all of them get > inherited so I don't have to repeat entries? Yes: File { owne

Re: [Puppet Users] Question about types and using a default/inherited value

2010-08-13 Thread Avi Miller
Hi Chris, On 14/08/2010, at 8:48 AM, Christopher Johnston wrote: > Since some of them all use the same options (user, group, mode, etc) with the > same values is there a way to set them globally once and have all of them get > inherited so I don't have to repeat entries? Yes: File { owne

[Puppet Users] Question about types and using a default/inherited value

2010-08-13 Thread Christopher Johnston
I have some types like below that have about 10 files or directories in a single type to keep my manifests looking clean and easier to maintain. Since some of them all use the same options (user, group, mode, etc) with the same values is there a way to set them globally once and have all of them ge

[Puppet Users] Puppet via Passenger+Apache2 on Ubuntu /certificate_revocation_list/ca 403 error

2010-08-13 Thread Yushu Yao
Hi Experts, I'm trying to run puppet via passenger _ apache2 on ubuntu 10.04 64bit and it refuse to work with an error: *err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 403 on SERVER: Forbidden request: 192.168.2.3(192.168.2.3) access to /certificate_revocation_list/ca [find] at line 93

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Forbidden request: HOSTNAME(IP_ADDRESSE) access to / certificate_revocation_list/ca

2010-08-13 Thread Patrick Mohr
On Aug 13, 2010, at 7:22 AM, Christian wrote: > When i run in the webbrowser https://:8140 I'm getting > following message: > > "The environment mus be purely alphanumeric, ''". Is it an problem not > to have an environment defined? My working puppetmaster gives the same error. -- You received

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Push changes to clients

2010-08-13 Thread Patrick Mohr
On Aug 13, 2010, at 7:21 AM, Christopher Johnston wrote: > ignoreschedules = true This will cause puppet to ignore schedule resources. It won't do what you want. > > > Cant you just use those two options to allow puppetruns to work and not have > the client attempt to do updates? > >

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server & Duplicate definition

2010-08-13 Thread Alan Barrett
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, martin kummer wrote: > [files] > path /etc/puppet/files > allow 178.78.72.121 <-space here > > this breaks the puppetmaster silently. this is real bad. this must be > a bug. This is puppet bug #3514. It's supposed to be fixed in version 2.6.0. --apb (Alan Barrett) --

[Puppet Users] Re: Forbidden request: HOSTNAME(IP_ADDRESSE) access to / certificate_revocation_list/ca

2010-08-13 Thread Christian
Hello Brian, I haven't changed my auth.conf. I've put these lines into my auth.conf. Unfortunatilly this also seems not to work. It reports the same error as before. The only thing i have changed is the folder where the auth.conf is located. The path name in the puppet.conf points to the right fi

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Push changes to clients

2010-08-13 Thread Christopher Johnston
listen = true ignoreschedules = true Cant you just use those two options to allow puppetruns to work and not have the client attempt to do updates? On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:44 AM, matonb wrote: > Is there a puppet.conf equivalent to --no-client ? > > All the nodes are RHEL a

Re: [Puppet Users] Push changes to clients

2010-08-13 Thread Disconnect
FYI there is a script around somewhere that works with puppetrun - it is a very lightweight daemon that just listens for puppetrun requests and launches the full daemon. On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Joe McDonagh wrote: > On 08/13/2010 05:05 AM, ScubaDude wrote: > >> I was wondering how to con

Re: [Puppet Users] Push changes to clients

2010-08-13 Thread Joe McDonagh
On 08/13/2010 05:05 AM, ScubaDude wrote: I was wondering how to configure the puppet clients to only listen, not to periodically pull configs down from the puppetmaster. I'd rather push the configs out from the puppetmaster with puppetrun... At a guess I need to set runinterval to 0 in /etc/pup

[Puppet Users] Re: Push changes to clients

2010-08-13 Thread matonb
Is there a puppet.conf equivalent to --no-client ? All the nodes are RHEL and will use the puppet service (init script). I'd rather not tweak that if possible. Thanks. On Aug 13, 11:38 am, Craig Dunn wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:05 AM, ScubaDude wrote: > > > I was wondering how to con

Re: [Puppet Users] Push changes to clients

2010-08-13 Thread Craig Dunn
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:05 AM, ScubaDude wrote: > I was wondering how to configure the puppet clients to only listen, > not to periodically pull configs down from the puppetmaster. > > I'd rather push the configs out from the puppetmaster with > puppetrun... > > Running puppetd with --no-clien

[Puppet Users] Push changes to clients

2010-08-13 Thread ScubaDude
I was wondering how to configure the puppet clients to only listen, not to periodically pull configs down from the puppetmaster. I'd rather push the configs out from the puppetmaster with puppetrun... At a guess I need to set runinterval to 0 in /etc/puppet/puppet.conf? -- You received this mes

[Puppet Users] Re: puppet-dashboard Explorer 8

2010-08-13 Thread ScubaDude
Ticket filed (bug, refactor) On Aug 13, 7:56 am, Matt Robinson wrote: > We weren't aware as none of us are using Internet Explorer.  We'll > have to have someone get a copy to test with at some point. > > Can you file a ticket? > > http://projects.puppetlabs.com > > Thanks, > Matt > > On Thu, Aug

[Puppet Users] Re: Installing packages that use dbconfig-common on Debian

2010-08-13 Thread Craig Box
Thanks Paul; I don't have a problem getting the preseed onto the system, it's just that dbconfig-common totally ignores the fact you've tried to preseed it out of existence. :) I may have to take this to the Debian bugtracker. Craig On Aug 12, 6:35 pm, Paul Hamby wrote: > We created a definitio