Re: [Puppet Users] Build nginx conf dynamically (depending on the upstream machines)

2010-05-26 Thread Daniel Pittman
Gonçalo Queirós writes: > That module helped me implement one of the proposed solutions. I though > there might be something "prettier" to handle this kind of situations, > but seems not. Nope. That is the "best practice" mechanism for doing this. Sorry. Daniel -- ✣ Daniel Pittman

Re: [Puppet Users] Toplevel domain and facter

2010-05-26 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, Am Mi den 26. Mai 2010 um 2:20 schrieb Joe McDonagh: [Problem with facter and toplevel domain] > Did you file a bug? No, I didn't. I do not find where to do so. However, as I had some problems subscribing this list with my non-google-mail

Re: [Puppet Users] Build nginx conf dynamically (depending on the upstream machines)

2010-05-26 Thread Gonçalo Queirós
Thank you David. That module helped me implement one of the proposed solutions. I though there might be something "prettier" to handle this kind of situations, but seems not. Thanks for your module :-) On 05/26/2010 01:34 PM, David Schmitt wrote: > On 5/26/2010 2:03 PM, Gonçalo wrote: >> Hi there

Re: [Puppet Users] Velocity '10 discount?

2010-05-26 Thread Brian Wingenroth
There's a 25% discount going on now if you register for Velocity this weekend (Memorial Day weekend). That's a deeper discount than you'll probably get as a member of any group. http://bit.ly/dA1anD Brian Full URL: http://post.oreilly.com/form/oreilly/viewhtml/9z1zrfl3r4chu2kg84hs4v36g7871

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Apache load balancing problem with 0.25.0

2010-05-26 Thread Christopher Webber
Was a solution to this issue ever found? I just upgraded my puppetmaster to 0.25.5 and the only client that is having issues is the only client running 0.25.5. -- cwebber On Sep 9, 2009, at 1:14 PM, martin wrote: > > On Sep 9, 5:35 pm, Martin Englund wrote: > >> Inspecting the code where it

Re: [Puppet Users] Build nginx conf dynamically (depending on the upstream machines)

2010-05-26 Thread David Schmitt
On 5/26/2010 2:03 PM, Gonçalo wrote: Hi there, im trying to set up puppet to manage a nginx server with load balancing. To achieve this i need to add every machine ip to the "upstream" conf of nginx. Doing this manually is easy, and all works fine, the problem is that i would like to have every u

[Puppet Users] Build nginx conf dynamically (depending on the upstream machines)

2010-05-26 Thread Gonçalo
Hi there, im trying to set up puppet to manage a nginx server with load balancing. To achieve this i need to add every machine ip to the "upstream" conf of nginx. Doing this manually is easy, and all works fine, the problem is that i would like to have every upstream machine to "warn" the nginx to

Re: [Puppet Users] puppetd output standard output of service

2010-05-26 Thread Matt
Hmm.. would prefer puppetd to log it out to a file somewhere. Maybe a feature request is in order. On 24 May 2010 13:45, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > If you turn on debug mode, you might get what you want. > > I don't quite recall, but it "feels" right. > > Trevor > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:37 A

Re: [Puppet Users] is anyone using a tool to diagram their manifests?

2010-05-26 Thread Simon Josi
I would be much interested in this code as well. Kid regards, Simon On 05/22/2010 06:03 PM, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > Well, it turns out that 0.25 completely broke my code (no big surprise). > > I was using the 'classes' method off of the parser, but I'll have to > re-write it all now since the pa