Douglas Garstang wrote:
>>> http://docs.reductivelabs.com/references/stable/type.html#sshkey
>
> WHat about known_hosts???
For /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts, using exported resources is quite handy:
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/ExportedResources
Something like:
# Collect ssh keys and
Hello,
I'm trying to reuse an ssh_authorized_key, but I'm having some problems.
There was a recent thread about using the same key for different users, but
I didn't see any resolution there. My issue is a bit different. I'm
currently using this key:
class ssh_keys::all {
class bob {
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/10 2:58 PM, Christopher Johnston wrote:
> Reason I am asking is I am having a bunch of SSL issues in production
> right now, I need to disable SSL until I get things fixed.
>
You can't disable SSL as client/server relies on it.
What are yo
Reason I am asking is I am having a bunch of SSL issues in production right
now, I need to disable SSL until I get things fixed.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Dan Bode wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Christopher Johnston
> wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to disable SSL all together
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Christopher Johnston wrote:
> Is there a way to disable SSL all together for testing?
I would use the puppet executable for testing/evaluation. It removes the
need to even have a server.
> -Chris
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to
Is there a way to disable SSL all together for testing?
-Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsub
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Douglas Garstang
wrote:
> Oh, yes, right... duh... thanks.
>
> Definitely better than append_if_no_such_line() which dumps the key to the
> log.
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Peter Meier wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>> I have multiple modules that need to use ssh int
On Mar 12, 2010, at 3:30 AM, DieterVDW wrote:
> The problem is, I -am- using apt!
> Those files are downloaded and installed using apt, I just want puppet
> to make sure they are owned by a certain user and group.
> That's the only thing puppet needs to do.
>
I didn't read the bug report before
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:55 PM, James Turnbull
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 13/03/10 7:34 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>> For those people following along at home on this issue, Lucas Nussbaum
>> chased it up on behalf of Debian and has just gotten a patch uploaded
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/03/10 7:34 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> For those people following along at home on this issue, Lucas Nussbaum
> chased it up on behalf of Debian and has just gotten a patch uploaded
> to Debian that resolves this problem.
>
> http://redmine.ruby-
Thomas Mueller writes:
> Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:30:59 -0800 schrieb DieterVDW:
>> On Mar 12, 11:21 am, Patrick wrote:
>>> Puppet doesn't handle a folder with lots of files well. It handles
>>> large files even worse. The standard advice is "Try putting the files
>>> in a package and distributi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/03/10 2:11 AM, Hubert Krause wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Am Wednesday 10 March 2010 11:07:14 schrieb Hubert Krause:
>> I was running Puppet server in version 0.24.8 on Srerver and 0.24.4 up to
>> 0.24.8 on client and configured multiple environment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/03/10 1:58 AM, Ed Greenberg wrote:
> Is there any centralized way to look at the puppetmaster server and see
> (a) when did we last hear from each puppet managed machine and (b) were
> there any errors (out on the managed machine) in the run?
>
For those people following along at home on this issue, Lucas Nussbaum
chased it up on behalf of Debian and has just gotten a patch uploaded
to Debian that resolves this problem.
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2739
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1,
Oh, yes, right... duh... thanks.
Definitely better than append_if_no_such_line() which dumps the key to the log.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Peter Meier wrote:
> Hi
>
>> I have multiple modules that need to use ssh into remote servers
>> without being prompted for a password, and therefore
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:59:01 -0600, James Cammarata wrote:
> I've created a custom augeas schema to handle up2date sources, and I'm
> using puppet to deploy it; followed by the use of augeas to add lines to
> the /etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources file. I do have a requirement on all
augeas
> lines that
I've created a custom augeas schema to handle up2date sources, and I'm
using puppet to deploy it; followed by the use of augeas to add lines to
the /etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources file. I do have a requirement on all augeas
lines that the File["rhnsources.aug"] be deployed first, however I just
notice
Hi
I have multiple modules that need to use ssh into remote servers
without being prompted for a password, and therefore multiple places
that I need to manage/add to a known_hosts file for. If I simply put a
copy of known_hosts in the files/ directory of the module, and push it
out, any other mo
Having an issue with appending ssh keys to the known_hosts file on systems.
I have multiple modules that need to use ssh into remote servers
without being prompted for a password, and therefore multiple places
that I need to manage/add to a known_hosts file for. If I simply put a
copy of known_hos
Interesting, I'll read that paper, thanks.
For our setup the version of software is exposed in the
puppet_node_classifier which connects to a database. Additionally, the
version of the configuration files and which puppet environment to use
are available as well. To do an upgrade, I change the ver
I see this from ssh-agent socket files, in the 0.25.4 version, because
it cannot back up files of type socket. This persists even though I
have set backup => false, in the tidy block.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to t
Look at The Foreman or Puppet Dashboard
http://theforeman.org/
http://reductivelabs.com/2009/12/14/a-tour-of-puppet-dashboard-0-1-0/
On Mar 12, 2010, at 8:58 AM, Ed Greenberg wrote:
> Is there any centralized way to look at the puppetmaster server and see (a)
> when did we last hear from each p
Is there any centralized way to look at the puppetmaster server and see
(a) when did we last hear from each puppet managed machine and (b) were
there any errors (out on the managed machine) in the run?
Thanks,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppe
Hello list,
Am Wednesday 10 March 2010 11:07:14 schrieb Hubert Krause:
> I was running Puppet server in version 0.24.8 on Srerver and 0.24.4 up to
> 0.24.8 on client and configured multiple environments. The desired behavior
> is to have different sets of manifests and modules for my two
> environ
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 06:18 -0800, DieterVDW wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2:48 pm, Brice Figureau
> wrote:
> > Yes it is, because it happens in the "file serving" code as part of
> > getting information about a given file. This part of the process doesn't
> > know getting the checksum is unnecessary (in fa
On Mar 12, 2:48 pm, Brice Figureau
wrote:
> Yes it is, because it happens in the "file serving" code as part of
> getting information about a given file. This part of the process doesn't
> know getting the checksum is unnecessary (in fact this is the same code
> that is used to serve file metadata
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
You, sir, are a saint.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Brice Figureau
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 05:42 -0800, DieterVDW wrote:
>> On Mar 12, 2:21 pm, Brice Figureau
>> wrote:
>> > It is checksumming every file.
>>
>> Aha. This is a known issue?
>
> At least to me :-)
>
>> Is there a bugrepo
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 05:42 -0800, DieterVDW wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2:21 pm, Brice Figureau
> wrote:
> > It is checksumming every file.
>
> Aha. This is a known issue?
At least to me :-)
> Is there a bugreport for this?
I think so:
http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/3170
and
http://projects
On Mar 12, 2:21 pm, Brice Figureau
wrote:
> It is checksumming every file.
Aha. This is a known issue?
Is there a bugreport for this?
Possibly a patch?
Is it normal no debug information is shown during this process?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hi,
I must admit I'd really like to like puppet, so I'm a bit agitated by
this issue, and won't rest till I know the cause :) .
Sorry for the information overload, hope you don't mind.
First of all, I've followed Martin's suggestion and simplified my
config.
This is my configuration in it's entir
Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:30:59 -0800 schrieb DieterVDW:
> On Mar 12, 11:21 am, Patrick wrote:
>> Puppet doesn't handle a folder with lots of files well. It handles
>> large files even worse. The standard advice is "Try putting the files
>> in a package and distributing them using apt." Another c
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 03:30 -0800, DieterVDW wrote:
> On Mar 12, 11:21 am, Patrick wrote:
> > Puppet doesn't handle a folder with lots of files well. It handles
> large files even worse. The standard advice is "Try putting the files
> in a package and distributing them using apt." Another commo
Yep, you're right, seconds not minutes.
That's what I get for answering e-mails pre-caffeine.
Did you try spitting out a --debug to a file and then post-analyzing that?
Trevor
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:55 AM, DieterVDW wrote:
> Also, whatever Puppetd is doing then, it seems to be unnecessary.
Hi,
Is this directory the only resource you are managing or are there others.
If not then try disabling all other resources and see if you still get
the same issue?
Best Regards
Martin Wheldon
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:55 PM, DieterVDW wrote:
> Also, whatever Puppetd is doing then, it seems t
Also, whatever Puppetd is doing then, it seems to be unnecessary.
If I execute puppetd -tv and wait until all files have been chown'd,
and then hit CTRL-C and run puppetd again,
the second time, puppetd finishes in about a minute.
The total process of running puppetd twice takes about 4 minutes .
Aren't the time values in seconds?
Because I can't match the "Total: 54.78" line to the "notice: Finished
catalog run in 1877.06 seconds" .
Also, the strange thing is that the actual changing of owner and group
happens pretty fast.
I see these messages passing during +- 20s for all files:
notice:
So, it looks like 30 minutes is being taken up in the Package type and
19 in the File type.
The Package type probably won't eat up much CPU at all as it's just
fetching and installing packages (unless they are some huge packages).
You seem to be trying to recursively manage *something* using the
Some more information from the (undocumented) --summarize option I
just discovered:
Changes:
Total: 4271
Resources:
Applied: 4271
Out of sync: 2138
Scheduled: 4435
Total: 115
Time:
Config retrieval: 1.36
Exec: 0.77
File: 19.23
Filebucket: 0.00
Host: 0.00
Package: 31.99
Schedule: 0.00
Service: 1.42
On Mar 12, 11:21 am, Patrick wrote:
> Puppet doesn't handle a folder with lots of files well. It handles large
> files even worse. The standard advice is "Try putting the files in a package
> and distributing them using apt." Another common answer is to try combining
> exec and rsync. I end
Christian, thanks for the clarification. After analyzing the problem I
have
clear that the configuration I had in mind no sense either
: D
I've solved the problem, so the subject of debate for me is
settled.
Thank you very much! Greetings!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
I was asking about this months ago and was pointed to
http://dev2ops.org/storage/downloads/FullyAutomatedProvisioning_Whitepaper.pdfas
an example and explanation of why Puppet was not "good" for
application
deployment, better at being part of a stack of apps to achieve it.
Not that I understand it
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
On Mar 12, 2010, at 1:18 AM, DieterVDW wrote:
> I just want this resource to make sure that all files in the directory
> are owned by user and group $username.
> /some/data/dir contains 300M in 6000+ files.
>
Puppet doesn't handle a folder with lots of files well. It handles large files
even
Hi,
I've been experimenting with Puppet for a few days now, and I really
like it.
But! I'm having real CPU usage problems.
Puppet is still happily eating away 100% CPU for almost an hour at a
time, with no apparent things happening.
(puppetd -tv --trace --debug, but nothing appearing in the conso
Sorry, i put ONLY the code here:
custom_functions.pp:
...
define superservice ( $initscript, $filecontrol ) {
$modelo = modelo_suscribe("$filecontrol")
package { $title: ensure => installed }
service { $initscript:
ensure => true,
enable => true,
sub
Sorry, to copy the code has emerged a small error:
custom_functions.pp:
define superservice ($initscript, $filecontrol) {
On 12 mar, 09:51, Antonio Xanxess
wrote:
> Hi Christian, thanks for the comment. I will explain more carefully
> the case so all of the data.
> My goal is to happen to sub
Hi Christian, thanks for the comment. I will explain more carefully
the case so all of the data.
My goal is to happen to subscribe clause with a variable proper
syntax, because the resource service I have defined as a function. For
my needs I created a specific function, make the process of generat
49 matches
Mail list logo
