On 30/09/09 23:36, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> How are those staying at the Serrano planning to get to the SFSU
> conference center? Looks like it's about 45 minutes via public
> transit...
I have a small car in which I can place about 3 extra people.
I'm at the Hotel Executive Vintage Court near Unio
Hi,
Ben Beuchler wrote:
> How are those staying at the Serrano planning to get to the SFSU
> conference center? Looks like it's about 45 minutes via public
> transit...
I somehow got a people-mover as a rental car (go Hertz!) so I can take
at least 5 more people. I'm at the Hyatt, but could sw
I did a cab ride there and rode the metro back.
It's about 20 minutes in a cab and > $20 and took me 35 minutes with the
walk on the metro.
If you have a car there is first come first serve parking right next to the
venue or a parking garage a little ways up the road.
I'll work up a map in the n
Two of us are starting off from 3rd Street & Folsom Street tomorrow
morning. Does anybody else in this part of the 'hood want to share a
cab with us?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users"
How are those staying at the Serrano planning to get to the SFSU
conference center? Looks like it's about 45 minutes via public
transit...
-Ben
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
If you're interested in coming by the Hackfest and having a chat
then we've set up in the Serrano Hotel lobby initially but
potentially we'll love to level M (the Mezzanine) if we get a few folks.
I'll be set-up here from about 10am and I thi
Hi,
It doesn't look like I will be able to make it physically witch is a
real bummer. I will though be a big fan of recording the meeting and
sessions so I can at least be there in spirit.
I hope that we have another one of these soon though, perhaps an East
cost or South West one?
It's too bad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Westin wrote:
> Sure, but I'm using content => template(...) to fill in the file.
> This appears in a baser class, and various other classes and defines
> are layered on top that, providing substitution variable values at
> different levels.
>
Is this normal behavior where /var/log/messages shows that every time
the puppet client daemon runs, it shows that my defined user on the
master keeps getting removed and re-added to the groups on that
specific servers?
every 30 minutes? This does not happen on Red Hat, only on SUSE
(sles) - coul
Negative. The warning is still present.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Brian Ferris wrote:
> > Just to elaborate, these warnings seem to appear whether I omit the owner
> > parameter or if I include the owner parameter, set to my cur
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Brian Ferris wrote:
> Just to elaborate, these warnings seem to appear whether I omit the owner
> parameter or if I include the owner parameter, set to my current user
> account. I'm using something like:
>
> file { "${my_target_directory}":
> ensure => directo
Just to elaborate, these warnings seem to appear whether I omit the owner
parameter or if I include the owner parameter, set to my current user
account. I'm using something like:
file { "${my_target_directory}":
ensure => directory,
recurse => true,
source => "puppet://$puppet_server/path/t
Hello all.
We're running Puppet to manage our linux-servers, but as of now we don't
really have a good setup for dealing with different environments
(production, qass, and so forth). The puppet manifests have been added to
Subversion. Our current apporach for staging for example a puppet class, w
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
jcbollinger jcbollinger wrote:
> > So, anyone could help me to understand why puppet cannot install
> > both packages?
>
> There is a mismatch between Puppet's view of package names as a flat
> name space and RPM's view of package identifiers as a 5-dimen
On Sep 29, 6:04 am, Arnau Bria wrote:
> I'm on SL5 (something like RH5) and I have something as simple as:
> package {"libX11-devel.x86_64": }
> package {"libX11-devel.i386": }
>
> Cause I want both versions installed in my system.
>
> But on one node:
[... only the x86_64 package
Chris Westin wrote:
> Sure, but I'm using content => template(...) to fill in the file.
> This appears in a baser class, and various other classes and defines
> are layered on top that, providing substitution variable values at
> different levels.
Problem is that some files really beg for being
Sure, but I'm using content => template(...) to fill in the file.
This appears in a baser class, and various other classes and defines
are layered on top that, providing substitution variable values at
different levels.
It seems unlikely that native resources could be created for all such
possibl
Trevor Hemsley wrote:
> Brian Ferris wrote:
>> I'm using puppet to manage configs on machines where I don't have root
>> access. Whenever I use a File resource where the source is a puppet://
>> resource, I get tons of warnings when I run puppet that look like:
>>
>> Cannot manage ownership unles
I found a workaround:
I changed some parts of the sun.rb:
cmd << "-d" << @resource[:source]
cmd << "-n" << "all"
looks like this is what we need.
cheers,
Andy
On Sep 30, 7:18 am, Andy Kocher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the same story with http. This looks good,
>
> /usr/sbin/pkgadd -dh
Brian Ferris wrote:
> I'm using puppet to manage configs on machines where I don't have root
> access. Whenever I use a File resource where the source is a puppet://
> resource, I get tons of warnings when I run puppet that look like:
>
> Cannot manage ownership unless running as root
>
> True en
Chris Westin wrote:
> In the type reference (http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/
> TypeReference), under the file resource, it says "As Puppet matures,
> it expected that the file resource will be used less and less to
> manage content, and instead native resources will be used to do so.
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
