[Puppet Users] Puppet 0.24.6 released as stable!

2008-10-22 Thread James Turnbull
Hi all Puppet version 0.24.6 code-named Camilla has been released as stable! http://reductivelabs.com/downloads/puppet/puppet-0.24.6.tgz There are a number of major new features including significant new language features. Of particular note is: * Support for complex if/else operations, for e

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Augeas Plugin

2008-10-22 Thread David Lutterkort
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 21:14 +0200, Marc Fournier wrote: > In fact my usual use case is > changes => "set Boss Nass", > onlyif => "get Boss != Nass ", > as a workaround for the issue discussed in this thread: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.augeas.devel/985/focus=9753 > > The

[Puppet Users] Re: Decentralized user management

2008-10-22 Thread Ryan Steele
Bah, copy and paste fail. I agree that uniformity is certainly something to go for, and something that will be addressed no later than the LDAP rollout. But, I think that piece-mealing my configs, as Andrew and Brian suggested, is probably the most prudent approach at the moment. Thanks to ever

[Puppet Users] Re: LDAP Problem

2008-10-22 Thread Subhasis Dasgupta
Let me do that and thank you very much. -S.D. 2008/10/22 Gary Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > If you want to make your database world readable, then add: > > access to * by anonymous read > > But you probably don't want that. You probably want to read the OpenLDAP > ACL docs and figure out how

[Puppet Users] Re: Node(s) exclusion(s)

2008-10-22 Thread Juri Rischel Jensen
Hi, I think you could do: node default { case $fqdn { "server01": { include bla } "default": { include dst include aide include cfg2html

[Puppet Users] Re: LDAP Problem

2008-10-22 Thread Gary Richardson
If you want to make your database world readable, then add: access to * by anonymous read But you probably don't want that. You probably want to read the OpenLDAP ACL docs and figure out how to make that tree available or how to protect things like the userPassword attribute. On Wed, Oct 22, 200

[Puppet Users] Re: LDAP Problem

2008-10-22 Thread Subhasis Dasgupta
First , many thanks for your response , Let me check the configuration again . If I want to use anonymous binding then what I have to do in ldap file. My ldap file configuration is here . database bdb suffix "dc=xyz,dc=com" rootdn "cn=Manager,dc=xyz,dc=com" rootpw secret Thanks again -Subhasis

[Puppet Users] Re: LDAP Problem

2008-10-22 Thread Subhasis Dasgupta
First , many thanks for your response , Let me check the configuration again . If I want to use anonymous binding then what I have to do in ldap file. My ldap file configuration is here . database bdb suffix "dc=xyz,dc=com" rootdn "cn=Manager,dc=xyz,dc=com" rootpw secret Thanks again -Subhasis

[Puppet Users] Re: Node(s) exclusion(s)

2008-10-22 Thread Tiago Cruz
Hi! On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Peter Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Is there some way to "exclude" a list of nodes from the "default" > > rule? > > by defining an explicit node entry for them? > Some like this: node default { include dst include aide include cfg2html

[Puppet Users] Re: LDAP Problem

2008-10-22 Thread Gary Richardson
I'm guessing it's a problem with your node_terminus config. I use anonymous binding myself, so I don't know the actual settings. First up, is ldapassword a typo? Second, you specify a password, but not a user to bind as. On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Subhasis Dasgupta < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

[Puppet Users] Re: Decentralized user management

2008-10-22 Thread Ryan Steele
On Oct 21, 2:15 pm, "Brian Mathis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you have the jurisdiction to change the IDs on the servers to sync > them up? That doesn't need LDAP, just judicious use of 'find' and > some downtime. > > Syncing up the IDs is really what needs to happen. --~--~-~--~

[Puppet Users] LDAP Problem

2008-10-22 Thread Subhasis Dasgupta
I am trying to configure puppet with LDAP repository . I have set puppet schema and I have also added node definition at LDAP. Here is my configuration details . ## Puppet.conf node_terminus = ldap ldapserver = 10.250.11.127 ldapbase =

[Puppet Users] Re: Node(s) exclusion(s)

2008-10-22 Thread Peter Meier
Hi > Is there some way to "exclude" a list of nodes from the "default" > rule? by defining an explicit node entry for them? greets pete --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post

[Puppet Users] Re: Node(s) exclusion(s)

2008-10-22 Thread Tiago Cruz
Is there some way to "exclude" a list of nodes from the "default" rule? Thanks On Oct 20, 6:42 pm, Tiago Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Guys, > > I have today around 200 machines under Puppet 0.24.5 (very nice > software!) but I can understood how can I get one "node exclusion". > > I'm