ges between 100 feets to 300 feets as
If the wiring is good, that's fine.
> i have multiple switches or SOHO switch
That may be a problem if you have too many cascaded switches ( max = 3) or if
they're looped somehow.
-toby
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https:
't
> know how stable they are, then I will have to change them also).
>
> Seems like if the gateway computer has the DNS addresses it could just pass
> it on to its two buddies.
pdnsd will do the trick too.
http://home.t-online.de/home/Moestl/
-toby
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Peter Boy wrote:
>
> I have to reinstall my system and consider to choose LVM for all HD
> space besides /boot. I would like to be able to resize the space (and
> filesystems) for the several logical partitions. Which filesystem I
> should use to be able to do so? (the RH docu is not very detailed
Peter Boy wrote:
>
> Am Son, 2003-02-23 um 01.10 schrieb toby:
> > With ext3 you can go up or down in size. Xfs can only increase, I believe. Xfs
> > does play well with other stuff though such as acl, attrib, quotas over nfs and
> > seems faster. [..]
>
> Thank
t Turbotax doing that,
they seemed to have turned the screws on users this year.
--
toby
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
around me is happy as a clam with ide.
So now I'm using scsi writers. And a rabbit's foot.
--
toby
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Peter Blomgren wrote:
>
> I'm seeing EXT3 errors:
>
> kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=81156390,
>sector=21233872
> kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev 03:06 (hda), sector 21233872
These are
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
. . . text whacked
>
> Feel free to fight amongst yourselves.
>
Wish you could ignore the agitator & not leave the forum, Mike. I try to
read all the posts by RH employees. I never know what info I may find
valuable in those posts.
David Durst wrote:
>
> > "Mike A. Harris" wrote:
> >>
> >
> >
> > . . . text whacked
> >
> >>
> >> Feel free to fight amongst yourselves.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Wish you could ignore the agitator & not leave the forum, Mike. I try to
> > read all the posts by RH employees. I never know what info I may f
Markku Kolkka wrote:
>
> Viestissä Perjantai 29. Marraskuuta 2002 11:12, Keith Morse kirjoitti:
> > I'm having a dickens of a time trying to figure
> > out where LVM gets initialized at in the startup scripts.
>
> /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit:
>
> # LVM initialization
> if [ -e /proc/lvm -a -x /sbin/vgc
Daniel Liston wrote:
>
> OK, I waiting 3 full days, going into 4 before reposing.
> Please, can anyone tell me where to fix this or when it
> broke?
>
> Original Message
>
> When did `domainname` start producing "(none)" as the output?
> I have looked through all the startup rc
Thomas Molina wrote:
>
> On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, LaJchon McRight wrote:
>
> > I tried changing with chmod. I'm logged in as root and it still gives
> > me Operation not permitted when I try anything on this file.
> >
>
> The inode looks severely bollixed. If chattr doesn't allow you to remove
> it
Justin Zygmont wrote:
>
> try smbpasswd -a and also set your workgroup name in the samba.conf
>
> On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, David Mascot wrote:
>
> > machine a message says, "\\localhost is not accessable, a duplicate name
> > exists on the network".
That error right there is one problem. I would
Craig White wrote:
>
> Still looking for someone that can give me a clue on this...sorry about
> the second post.
>
> I'm having trouble connecting to either printer in the office...The
> first is an HP LaserJet IIISi (very old network card) and a Toshiba
> Copier.
>
> Both have TCP/IP support a
toby wrote:
>
> Craig White wrote:
> >
> > Still looking for someone that can give me a clue on this...sorry about
> > the second post.
> >
> > I'm having trouble connecting to either printer in the office...The
> > first is an HP LaserJet IIISi (
Bob Parry wrote:
>
> I have a small home business network with one Win 2K one Win XP and
> one Red Hat 8.0 machine. The Linux box can connect and share the
> printer on the XP machine. However I can not connect to the Linux
> box from the Windows boxes.
>
> The error I get is "Path not Found".
Bob Parry wrote:
>
> Thanks for the help. Then computer name, Deneb, shows up in RH console
> as well as in /etc/sysconfig/network.
>
I assume you can ping DeneB from Win and that you login to the win boxes as
bobp,robpar or PMartinez. Also as another poster suggested, that you've verified
that
Craig White wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 21:12, Donald G Wilson Jr wrote:
> > Many thanks to all those who offered help on my IDE errors. It ended up
> > being the IDE cable, as it wasn't the newer type.
> >
> > Now I get nice clean boots again.
> >
> > I might add this though.
> >
> > I insta
Bob Parry wrote:
>
> Well I'm making "progress". I have tried net use from the windows
> boxes but I did not know the sintax properly. I tried as you suggested
> and the error has changed!
>
> It now says that no service is running at the the Samba end.
That may be your problem - the smb ser
Neil Loffhagen wrote:
>
> This is sounding more and more like the problem I had with Samba. I did
> reply before (perhaps you missed it?) about turning off the firewall on
> the Server to see what happens. For me it sorted it out. Just then
> need to start to work on the firewall rules.
>
> Ne
David Durst wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 04:25, David Durst wrote:
> >> > I guess flash can be useful for making kids web games, but I'd
> >> rather see java games. Anyway, flash is one of the things that
> >> annoys me most about the web.
> >>
> >> So sorry to hear that you hate flash so m
"Reinhard X. Fuerst" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i have a little network with 2 segments:
> net A -> 192.168.0.x, Mask 255.255.255.0
> net B -> 192.168.2.x, Mask 255.255.255.0
>
> One Linux-RH8-Computer (my gateway) has 2 ethernet cards:
> eth0 -> 192.168.2.1 (255.255.255.0)
> eth1 -> 192.168.0.66 (255.
Tom Bell wrote:
>
> I have an weird problem with a RedHat Linux server running v8.0. Here is
> what I have...
>
> HostnameType of host
> L2000 HP-UX v11.00
> Imaging-2k Windows 2000 Server
> nfstest RedHat Linux v8.0 (current up2date rpm's)
>
> I use the "nfstest"
Lionel Barrow wrote:
>
> Ok guys, I got hopefully an easy question for you to answer. I need a
> reputable, powerful and easy to configure Linux backup program. I am going
> to be configuring several RH 8.0 machines for some of my customers and I
> want a solution where they just have to insert a
24 matches
Mail list logo
