Removing glibc 2.3.1

2003-03-21 Thread John Ketchum
ve the above problem when compiling with gcc 3.2. Can anyone advise me on how to cleanly remove glibc 2.3.1 from /usr/local/lib, without totally trashing my system, so I have a pure 2.3.2 system? Thanks in advance for any help. John Ketchum Qualcomm Inc. -- Psyche-list mailing lis

Broken gcc 3.2 in RH8.0 with glibc-2.3.2

2003-03-28 Thread John Ketchum
e gcc 3.2 work? Thanks John Ketchum Qualcomm Inc. -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Re: Broken gcc 3.2 in RH8.0 with glibc-2.3.2

2003-03-28 Thread John Ketchum
, the explicit reference to -lstdc++ isn't necessary. I will enter this in Bugzilla. Is this a bug or a "feature"? At 12:53 PM 3/28/2003 -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 11:28:54AM -0500, John Ketchum wrote: > I'm having a problem with gcc/glibc comaptib

Re: Broken gcc 3.2 in RH8.0 with glibc-2.3.2

2003-03-28 Thread John Ketchum
Not using g++ driver-- just gcc. I guess you're saying its not a bug, its a feature. At 02:16 PM 3/28/2003 -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:08:39PM -0500, John Ketchum wrote: > On further investigation, it turns out that this problem is specific to C++ > prog

Repost: error--/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to '__libc_stack_end@GLIBC_2.1'

2003-04-01 Thread John Ketchum
r solves the problem, because I get a different set of unresolved references. I would like to have a clean install of gcc 3.2 and glibc 2.3.2, but I don't want to resort to the extreme solution of reformatting and reinstalling 8.0 Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. John Ketch

Re: Repost: error--/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to '__libc_stack_end@GLIBC_2.1'

2003-04-03 Thread John Ketchum
At 05:04 PM 4/2/2003 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote: On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, John Ketchum wrote: . When you installed 3.1, did you change any configuration stuff so that the appropriate libraries would be linked? When I had two versions of the compiler, I needed a $LD_LIBRARY_PATH

Re: Repost: error--/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to '__libc_stack_end@GLIBC_2.1'

2003-04-04 Thread John Ketchum
ib/ld-linux.so.2 --library-path /usr/local/foo/lib /some/path/prog or link the programs directly against that dynamic linker and library path: gcc -Wl,-dynamic-linker,/usr/local/foo/lib/ld-linux.so.2,-rpath,/usr/local/foo/lib Jakub John Ketchum Qualcomm Inc. -- Psyche-list mailing

Re: Repost: error--/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to '__libc_stack_end@GLIBC_2.1'

2003-04-04 Thread John Ketchum
At 10:12 AM 4/4/2003 -0500, you wrote: On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:00:16AM -0500, John Ketchum wrote: > Thank you, Jakub. That was indeed the problem. The following command line > does the trick: > /usr/bin/gcc -o test test.c -Wl,-dynamic-linker,/lib/ld-linux.so.2,-rpath,/lib -dynam

Re: PortSentry

2003-06-19 Thread John Ketchum
entrytools/ -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list John Ketchum Qualcomm Inc. 9 Damonmill Square Suite 2A Concord, MA 01742 -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Re: Time on server jumps ahead

2003-07-21 Thread John Ketchum
) How do I configure my RH8 machine to synch itself according to an atomic clock on the WWW? 2) How do you change the time zone on a Linux server (AFTER the installation) Thanks, Jason -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list John Ketchum

Problems with new glibc

2003-11-17 Thread John Ketchum
4.18-14), which didn't solve the problem. Any help would be appreciated. John Ketchum Qualcomm Inc. -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Re: Problems with new glibc

2003-11-18 Thread John Ketchum
At 08:49 AM 11/18/2003 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 02:36, John Ketchum wrote: > I went away for a week, and while I was away, apt-get upgraded glibc > packages to 2.3.2-4.80.8 on my RH8 machine. X is now broken-- not > completely but apps either don't work, o

Re: Problems with new glibc

2003-11-19 Thread John Ketchum
At 11:15 AM 11/19/2003 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 23:23, John Ketchum wrote: > At 08:49 AM 11/18/2003 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: > >On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 02:36, John Ketchum wrote: > > > I went away for a week, and while I was away, apt-get upgraded glibc