For strange reasons, sometimes rpm gets 'freezed' when working with
database. For now, the method that I know to solve the hang ( but no
futures hangs ) is to kill all rpm process. Go to /var/lib/rpm and delete
all __db.00(number) files. Then rpm processes will work correctly until the
next hang ;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:41:56 -0600, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> > > > As someone pointed out to me once, iptables -L -v only shows one table.
> > > >
> > > > "service iptables status" gets 'em all.
> > >
> > > Would you please expand on this? I am not se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 13:40:09 -0800, Stephen Mah wrote:
> Is there a way to configure the Package Management utility to point to
> an NFS server with the redhat tree?
> instead of putting in the CD everytime you want to add/remove a group of
> packag
Hi,
You probably should install agt-get from http://psyche.freshrpms.net. I'm not sure,
but it might do want you want.
Regards!
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 21:59:43 -0100, Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 19:13, Pete Peterson wrote:
>>
>> The dhclient man page seems to imply that "dhclient -r" will do that.
>
> I whish it was that easy. That only returns: -- # dhclient -r eth0
> cat: /var/run/dhclient.pid: No suc
Hi
I need some advice about removing glibc 2.3.1. Here's how I got where I am.
Installed gcc 3.1 from tarball sources on RH 7.3 machine. (with custom
compiled 2.4.19 kernel)
Upgraded machine to RH 8.0 still running 2.4.19 kernel
Now I had an 8.0 machine with gcc 3.1 in /usr/local/bin, and gcc 3.2
RH 8.0 w/updates
I did the glibc update yesterday. I am no longer able to use Balsa; it either
has a segmentation fault or hangs and has to be killed.
Any advice on what to do to get it back?
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-l
There is (in gnome) the command lan:/ how kde ?
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
[Upgrading things like glibc make me nervous. :-(]
I downloaded all of the new glibc rpms and said:
rpm -Uvh glibc*
It said Preparing 100%
Then is said glibc-common 100%
Then glibc 100%
Then it said restarting init.
Then it just hung.
I killed it with a -9 and tried to see what I had. It said
Il gio, 2003-03-20 alle 17:37, David Boyes ha scritto:
> I have the 3 CD image install disk for Redhat 8.0. I believe called ISO.
>
> All three check out on the test before install.
>
> I am installing on a 3.2gb drive that is formatted FAT32.
>
> The install process seems to be going flawlessly
hi.
new to linux. i want to disable direct root login/access to my linux (rh8.0)
box. i want to have the user have to login as user foo, and then have to su
to root.
is there an easy/quick way to do this?
i tried the following with no luck:
vi to /etc/ssh/ssh_config and added the line:
PermitR
Joe Klemmer writes
>
> On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 12:04, Jay Crews wrote:
>
> > The question is, does yahoo run a pop or imap server?
>
> They do. You just have to pay for it.
Yes..$29.95/yr I think.
Which brings me back to the origional question, of, with all the
good email options,
Il ven, 2003-03-21 alle 19:31, Steven W. Orr ha scritto:
> [Upgrading things like glibc make me nervous. :-(]
>
> I downloaded all of the new glibc rpms and said:
>
> rpm -Uvh glibc*
>
> It said Preparing 100%
> Then is said glibc-common 100%
> Then glibc 100%
> Then it said restarting init.
>
Simple oversight...
The file should have been /etc/ssh/sshd_config
Not ssh_config that one is for ssh client...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Douglas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:disabling root acces
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Dan G wrote:
> userlist_deny is not for vsftpd.ftpusers. What I am looking for is a
> simple user entry in vsftpd.ftpusers to deny access like ftpaccess does
> for wu-ftpd. The man page for vsftpd says vsftpd.ftpusers should do
> this, but it does not. Anyone have any ideas wh
maybe you change wrong file ...
try change /etc/ssh/sshd_config
i put this configuration (PermitRootLogin no) and works fine...
see ya!!
Bruce Douglas wrote:
new to linux. i want to disable direct root login/access to my linux (rh8.0)
box. i want to have the user have to login as user foo, and th
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 10:44:39AM -0800, Bruce Douglas wrote:
> i tried the following with no luck:
>
> vi to /etc/ssh/ssh_config and added the line:
>
> PermitRootLogin no
>
> i then restarted with
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd restart
>
> i can still login as root...
Right change, wrong file. Yo
Hi to everyone,
has anyone some hints to print with it?
Actually I can print only from OO, but I can't print from another app...
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Hello all,
if I configure fetchmail to go pull mail from my ISP, can I then use a mail
client inside my network on another computer to pull mail from my redhat
box instead of directly from my ISP? Additionally, I've seen a utility
called fetchmailconf in previous versions, is that available fo
got it!!
thanks .. the little things...
however, i have another question ... how does one go about forcing a new
user to have to immeadiately change their password upon logging in.
i created a new user foo
i did >chage -d 0 foo
when i log in to test, i get the user prompt, when i enter the pas
John Mathey wrote:
Hello all,
if I configure fetchmail to go pull mail from my ISP, can I then use a
mail client inside my network on another computer to pull mail from my
redhat box instead of directly from my ISP?
Yes, fetchmail will retrieve your mail and deliver it to your local MTA,
which
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 01:40:13PM -0600, John Mathey wrote:
> Hello all,
> if I configure fetchmail to go pull mail from my ISP, can I then use
> a mail client inside my network on another computer to pull mail
> from my redhat box instead of directly from my ISP?
Yes. I did this on a dialup fir
On Fri Mar 21 2003 at 13:40, John Mathey wrote:
> if I configure fetchmail to go pull mail from my ISP, can I then use a mail
> client inside my network on another computer to pull mail from my redhat
> box instead of directly from my ISP?
Yes, many people do it like that. Myself included.
It
Viestissä Perjantai 21. Maaliskuuta 2003 00:59, Torgny Nyblom kirjoitti:
> On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 19:13, Pete Peterson wrote:
> > The dhclient man page seems to imply that "dhclient -r" will do that.
>
> I whish it was that easy. That only returns:
> --
> # dhclient -r eth0
> cat: /var/run/dhcli
Thanks for contacting me, your email has been received.
Unfortunately I am out of the office and won't be returning until April
1. I will respond to your note as soon as possible when I get back.
Thanks for your patience. If you need immediate assistance please
contact Tim Loesch or Robert Maki
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 03:48:00AM +, Sanjeewa Wijerathne wrote:
> Im running disk quota on my system, but its only on
> /home partition. Im not sure you can enable quota on /
> --sanjeewa
It can be done but it has unpredictable results. Normally when
quotacheck runs it umounts the filesystem s
On 13:40 21 Mar 2003, John Mathey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| if I configure fetchmail to go pull mail from my ISP, can I then use a mail
| client inside my network on another computer to pull mail from my redhat
| box instead of directly from my ISP?
Provided your first fetchmail deposits to
On 17:57 21 Mar 2003, Wolfgang Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Can anyone tell me or point me in the right direction as to where to get
| hold of some editor documentation. Either in HTML or PDF format.
|
| What I basically would like to do, is to write some *.sh scripts. And use
| the editor co
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, John Mathey wrote:
>Hello all,
>if I configure fetchmail to go pull mail from my ISP, can I then use a mail
>client inside my network on another computer to pull mail from my redhat
>box instead of directly from my ISP? Additionally, I've seen a utility
>called fetchmai
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Keith Winston wrote:
>Some distros bundle fetchmailconf with fetchmail, but I don't see it in
>the Red Hat 8 package and I also don't see it anywhere as a separate
>package on the CDs. It's really not hard to set up the config file with
>a text editor, though.
Whoops!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 21 March 2003 06:44 pm, Oisin C. Feeley wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, John Mathey wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >if I configure fetchmail to go pull mail from my ISP, can I then use a
> > mail client inside my network on another computer to pull mai
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 13:44, Bruce Douglas wrote:
> vi to /etc/ssh/ssh_config and added the line:
>
> PermitRootLogin no
>
> i then restarted with
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd restart
This works for me. I just had to change that yesterday. Also, FWIW,
you can do -
# service sshd restart
Greetings,
I was wondering if anyone is using Qlogic 2200/66mhz Part #:880014-000 on
RedHat 8.0 or 8.1 beta?
I know it works with RedHat 7.3, so probably it will work with 8.0.
But I wanted to make sure there are no issues, before I get into setting up the test
environment
Thanks,
Saqib Ali
When rebooting a RH 8.0 system, I get the message
syslogd unknown priority name ""
during the boot process.
I have looked at:
/etc/logrotate.d/syslog
/etc/syslog.conf
/etc/log.d/conf/services/syslogd.conf
/etc/log.d/scripts/services/syslogd
and do not see anything that would cause this error
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 01:53, Justin Zygmont wrote:
> just go to a mirror site and download the new ernel package, then type rpm
> -Uvh packagename and reboot. This vulnerability sounds like it would be
> hard to exploit.
Hard to exploit? The exploit is out in the wild.
--
Psyche-list mai
On 15:06 22 Mar 2003, Lachlan Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 01:53, Justin Zygmont wrote:
| > just go to a mirror site and download the new ernel package, then type rpm
| > -Uvh packagename and reboot. This vulnerability sounds like it would be
| > hard to exploit.
|
|
36 matches
Mail list logo
