Re:KDE 3.1 on RH8?

2003-02-21 Thread Andreas Schlueter
Hallo Dan, http://kde-redhat.sourceforge.net/ here you find eyerything you need. I tried it out and it works great. greets andy schlueter https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:54:14 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thursday 20 February 2003 16:51, Bill and/or Chris wrote: > > I am trying to upgrade to the latest kernel, 2.4.18-24.8.0, and I keep > > getting an error message from up2date saying, "Test

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Ralf Spenneberg
Am Fre, 2003-02-21 um 02.54 schrieb Bill and/or Chris: > On Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:54, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > On Thursday 20 February 2003 16:51, Bill and/or Chris wrote: > > > I am trying to upgrade to the latest kernel, 2.4.18-24.8.0, and I > > > keep getting an error message from up

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Bill and/or Chris
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 05:37, Ralf Spenneberg wrote: > Am Fre, 2003-02-21 um 02.54 schrieb Bill and/or Chris: > > On Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:54, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > > On Thursday 20 February 2003 16:51, Bill and/or Chris wrote: > > > > I am trying to upgrade to the latest kernel, 2.4

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Michael Kuss
On 21 Feb 2003, Bill and/or Chris wrote: > On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 05:37, Ralf Spenneberg wrote: > > Am Fre, 2003-02-21 um 02.54 schrieb Bill and/or Chris: > > > On Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:54, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > > > > On Thursday 20 February 2003 16:51, Bill and/or Chris wrote: > >

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Bill and/or Chris
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 05:00, Michael Schwendt wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:54:14 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > On Thursday 20 February 2003 16:51, Bill and/or Chris wrote: > > > I am trying to upgrade to the latest kernel, 2.4.18-24.8.0,

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Bill and/or Chris
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 06:31, Michael Kuss wrote: > On 21 Feb 2003, Bill and/or Chris wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 05:37, Ralf Spenneberg wrote: > > > Am Fre, 2003-02-21 um 02.54 schrieb Bill and/or Chris: > > > > On Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:54, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > > > > > > On

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Michael Kuss
On 21 Feb 2003, Bill and/or Chris wrote: > On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 05:00, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:54:14 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > > On Thursday 20 February 2003 16:51, Bill and/or Chris wrote: > > > > I

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Ralf Spenneberg
Am Fre, 2003-02-21 um 12.37 schrieb Bill and/or Chris: > > > error: Failed dependencies: > > > ppp <= 2.3.15 conflicts with kernel-2.4.18-24.8.0 > > > > > > As I stated before, the version of ppp that I have is 2.4.1-7. Any > > > ideas? Just for the curious, can you do a rpm -q --whatpr

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21 Feb 2003 06:24:44 -0500, Bill and/or Chris wrote: > I am attempting to upgrade the kernel via up2date, so this should not > even be a problem. But when I try to install it manually, I get the > following error message: > > error: Failed depend

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Bill and/or Chris
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 06:40, Michael Kuss wrote: > On 21 Feb 2003, Bill and/or Chris wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 05:00, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:54:14 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > > > > On T

Red Hat Network Alert

2003-02-21 Thread Mariano Wahlmann
Does anybody knows why RedHat send mails with uptdates everyday, and when you execute up2date -l, apears no update available? RedHat been doing this since a few weeks ago.

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Bill and/or Chris
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 07:07, Ralf Spenneberg wrote: > Am Fre, 2003-02-21 um 12.37 schrieb Bill and/or Chris: > > > > > error: Failed dependencies: > > > > ppp <= 2.3.15 conflicts with kernel-2.4.18-24.8.0 > > > > > > > > As I stated before, the version of ppp that I have is 2.4.1-7. Any

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Bill and/or Chris
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 07:13, Michael Schwendt wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 21 Feb 2003 06:24:44 -0500, Bill and/or Chris wrote: > > > I am attempting to upgrade the kernel via up2date, so this should not > > even be a problem. But when I try to install it manua

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Ralf Spenneberg
Am Fre, 2003-02-21 um 13.31 schrieb Bill and/or Chris: > On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 07:07, Ralf Spenneberg wrote: > > Am Fre, 2003-02-21 um 12.37 schrieb Bill and/or Chris: > > > > > > > error: Failed dependencies: > > > > > ppp <= 2.3.15 conflicts with kernel-2.4.18-24.8.0 > > > > > > > > > >

Processor type a kernel was compiled for

2003-02-21 Thread Michael Kuss
Just stumbled over something: is there an easy way to figure out for which processor a kernel was compiled? I.e., on my laptop (Pentium MMX), I have kernel-2.4.18-24.8.0.i386 and kernel-2.4.18-18.8.0.i586 . uname -rmpi gives me 2.4.18-24.8.0 i586 i586 i386 and 2.4.18-18.8.0 i586 i586 i386 re

Re: network backups with tar - cannot generate passwordless SSH key

2003-02-21 Thread Jason Dale
Hi A.J Thanks for taking the time and the effort to write up your solution ! I really appreciate it :) Unfortunately, still no joy. I assume that I am putzing up somewhere, so I will give you a summarized log of exactly what I did on my servers. The two test servers I am using: 'blackhawk' - Re

Accesing windows directories

2003-02-21 Thread daYz
Hi, I have Windows besides Linux installed, but can I acces windows directrories from Linux, and if so, how/where can I acces them? Thanks -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

In a pickle with updating

2003-02-21 Thread Harry Putnam
I've gotten myself into quite a pickle with todays attempt to update. up2date -u showed these: lynx-2.8.5-7.1.i386.rpm pam-devel-0.75-46.8.0.i386.rpm pam-0.75-46.8.0.i386.rpm shadow-utils-2902-12.8.i386.rpm I downloaded them since I have up2date set to only download. Had a look, then

Re: network backups with tar - cannot generate passwordless SSH

2003-02-21 Thread John Horne
On 21-Feb-2003 at 13:27:44 Jason Dale wrote: > Strange. the file iscalled 'identity' and not id_dsa. I will just use the > file in the same way, though. > This will be for SSH protocol version 1. I only use version 2 with RSA keys since it is more secure. (ssh-keygen -t rsa ). id_dsa is a protocol

Re: Accesing windows directories

2003-02-21 Thread Dave Sherman
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 19:34, daYz wrote: > Hi, > > I have Windows besides Linux installed, but can I acces windows directrories > from Linux, and if so, how/where can I acces them? It depends on the version of Windows you have installed, or more accurately, the version of filesystem you are usin

Re: In a pickle with updating

2003-02-21 Thread Michael Kuss
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Harry Putnam wrote: > I've gotten myself into quite a pickle with todays attempt to update. > > up2date -u showed these: > > lynx-2.8.5-7.1.i386.rpm pam-devel-0.75-46.8.0.i386.rpm > pam-0.75-46.8.0.i386.rpm shadow-utils-2902-12.8.i386.rpm > > I downloaded them si

Re: In a pickle with updating

2003-02-21 Thread Harry Putnam
Michael Kuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Wondered if anyone else had seen anything weird like this? > > yes, have it seen 2 or 3 times, it's more or less a feature. To > work-around, you have to recreate the rpm database. You will see that > lynx got installed, and the rest not. How do you d

Re: Red Hat Network Alert

2003-02-21 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:31:23AM -0300, Mariano Wahlmann wrote: > Does anybody knows why RedHat send mails with uptdates everyday, and > when you execute up2date -l, apears no update available? > RedHat been doing this since a few weeks ago. > I wish I knew, it is confusing the hell out of me.

Re: Processor type a kernel was compiled for

2003-02-21 Thread Bystrm Roger
Looks like to me that the kernel name speaks for it self.. As you have an P. MMX processor you probably want to run an i586 kernel Roger On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:58:58 +0100 (CET), Michael Kuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just stumbled over something: is there an easy way to figure out fo

Seeking advice on mother board

2003-02-21 Thread John Nall
This is a little bit off-topic, but not entirely. So hopefully I will be forgiven. I want to upgrade an old PC that I have with a new motherboard, new HD, etc., in order to make a system which I will install RH8.0 on. It is strictly for home use, but nevertheless I would like it to be a stabl

Re: In a pickle with updating

2003-02-21 Thread Ralf Spenneberg
Am Fre, 2003-02-21 um 15.07 schrieb Harry Putnam: > I killed that process and ran `rpm -q lynx' to see if that had gotten > installed. Again the process hung. > Remove the __db.00* files in /var/lib/rpm exec rpm --rebuilddb You should be fine. Cheers, Ralf -- Ralf Spenneberg RHCE, RHCX IPs

Syslog

2003-02-21 Thread Leonard Miller
Hi, I am trying to get my RH8 box to accept syslog messages from my APC UPS'ss. I have added the following to my syslog.conf # APC UPS syslog messages local5.* /var/log/apc.log On the UPS card, I have syslog enabled, sending to my server IP

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21 Feb 2003 07:31:24 -0500, Bill and/or Chris wrote: > # rpm -q --whatprovides ppp > ppp-2.4.1-7 > ppp-mppe-2.4.0-4 ppp-mppe is not a package from Red Hat and most likely the cause of the confusion. I would recommend you erase it prior to installi

Re: Processor type a kernel was compiled for

2003-02-21 Thread Cheryl L. Southard
Hi Michael, Is this the command you are looking for? > rpm -q --queryformat '%{arch}\n' kernel Cheryl On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:58:58PM +0100, Michael Kuss wrote: > Just stumbled over something: > > is there an easy way to figure out for which processor a kernel was > compiled? I.e.,

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21 Feb 2003 07:35:29 -0500, Bill and/or Chris wrote: > > > I am attempting to upgrade the kernel via up2date, so this should not > > > even be a problem. But when I try to install it manually, I get the > > > following error message: > > > > > >

Re: Red Hat Network Alert

2003-02-21 Thread Jesse Keating
On Friday 21 February 2003 04:31, Mariano Wahlmann uttered: > Does anybody knows why RedHat send mails with uptdates everyday, and > when you execute up2date -l, apears no update available? > RedHat been doing this since a few weeks ago. Your profile might need updating. up2date -p -- Jesse Kea

Re: Processor type a kernel was compiled for

2003-02-21 Thread Jesse Keating
On Friday 21 February 2003 04:58, Michael Kuss uttered: > is there an easy way to figure out for which processor a kernel was > compiled? I.e., on my laptop (Pentium MMX), I have > kernel-2.4.18-24.8.0.i386 and kernel-2.4.18-18.8.0.i586 . rpm -q --qf '%{arch} \n' kernel -- Jesse Keating RHCE MC

Re: In a pickle with updating

2003-02-21 Thread Tom Ball
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 06:07, Harry Putnam wrote: > I've gotten myself into quite a pickle with todays attempt to update. One can imagine that must have been a very big pickle for you to be able to climb into it! :-) These messages go out to an international audience. While the English expertise

Re: In a pickle with updating

2003-02-21 Thread Tom Diehl
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Harry Putnam wrote: > I've gotten myself into quite a pickle with todays attempt to update. > > up2date -u showed these: > > lynx-2.8.5-7.1.i386.rpm pam-devel-0.75-46.8.0.i386.rpm > pam-0.75-46.8.0.i386.rpm shadow-utils-2902-12.8.i386.rpm > > I downloaded them si

Re: how source.tar.gz -> source.src.rpm -> binary.rpm

2003-02-21 Thread Sergio Durand
i started from zero and me to it: ./configure OK make OK checkinstall Ok the out of checkinstall... Building RPM package...OK Installing RPM package...OK Erasing temporary files...OK Writing backup package...OK Deleting temp dir...OK Done. The new package has been installed and saved to /usr/

RE: network backups with tar - cannot generate passwordless SSH key

2003-02-21 Thread Dave Tibbals
Have you edited your /etc/ssh/sshd_config file correctly? You need to specify the correct location for the authorized_keys file and whether to use public key authentication or not. In my situation I am using protocol version 2 so my authorized keys file is ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2. The following was

Re: Processor type a kernel was compiled for

2003-02-21 Thread Michael Kuss
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Cheryl L. Southard wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Is this the command you are looking for? > > rpm -q --queryformat '%{arch}\n' kernel thanks, hmm, didn't think of that one. That does it. Though, I was expecting something like "kernelversion" does. Cheers, Michael

Re: In a pickle with updating

2003-02-21 Thread Michael Kuss
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Harry Putnam wrote: > Michael Kuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Wondered if anyone else had seen anything weird like this? > > > > yes, have it seen 2 or 3 times, it's more or less a feature. To > > work-around, you have to recreate the rpm database. You will see that

Re: In a pickle with updating

2003-02-21 Thread Jesse Keating
On Friday 21 February 2003 06:43, Harry Putnam wrote: > How do you do that if root can't run rpm commands? killall -9 rpm; rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__* -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE http://geek.j2solutions.net Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/r

Re: Syslog

2003-02-21 Thread Peter Conrad
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:45:11AM -0600, Leonard Miller wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to get my RH8 box to accept syslog messages from my > APC UPS'ss. I have added the following to my syslog.conf > > # APC UPS syslog messages > local5.* > /va

Re: Syslog

2003-02-21 Thread Leonard Miller
DOH What a pinhead!!! Thanks >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/21/03 12:13PM >>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:45:11AM -0600, Leonard Miller wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to get my RH8 box to accept syslog messages from my > APC UPS'ss. I have added the following to my syslog.conf > > # APC UPS s

Re: DMA DVD/CD-ROM Issues

2003-02-21 Thread Harold Helmich
FYI - that was the trick. Thank you very much. In the long run, I think the hdd=ide-scsi may have worked and I was running into sound issues. But it works now - DVD playback rocks. Thanks again, Jesse. Harry Jesse Keating wrote: On Thursday 20 February 2003 17:37, Harold Helmich uttered:

Re: Syslog

2003-02-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 09:45:11 -0600, Leonard Miller wrote: > I am trying to get my RH8 box to accept syslog messages from my > APC UPS'ss. I have added the following to my syslog.conf > > # APC UPS syslog messages > local5.*

RPM issue

2003-02-21 Thread Andrew Schott
Hello! I have a question as to the correct way to install an RPM. I got an RPM that whines about a missing library, however it is there. Take a look: [schotty@leinenkugel schotty]$ sudo rpm -ivh idesk-0.3.5-alt3.i586.rpm warning: idesk-0.3.5-alt3.i586.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID eac91

how to deal with the font interregnum?

2003-02-21 Thread James Jones
OK. I've read the messages about fontconfig, and evidently the following is the case: 1. fontconfig is a neat library, and what programs are starting to use now and will use in the future. 2. Old programs don't use fontconfig. So, during this transition, is there a simple way to make old and n

Re: In a pickle with updating

2003-02-21 Thread Craig White
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 07:43, Harry Putnam wrote: > Michael Kuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Wondered if anyone else had seen anything weird like this? > > > > yes, have it seen 2 or 3 times, it's more or less a feature. To > > work-around, you have to recreate the rpm database. You will s

problem w/ bind + dhcp

2003-02-21 Thread Sergio Durand
hi folks!! me again... now with bind problem... i'm getting (very very) this messages on my /var/log/messages (192.168.0.1) Feb 21 14:17:20 lcl1 named[566]: client 192.168.0.2#1627: updating zone 'domain.com/IN': update failed: 'RRset exists (value dependent)' prerequisite not satisfied (NXRRSE

Re: how source.tar.gz -> source.src.rpm -> binary.rpm

2003-02-21 Thread Keith Winston
Sergio Durand wrote: i started from zero and me to it: ./configureOK makeOK checkinstallOk the out of checkinstall... Building RPM package...OK Installing RPM package...OK Erasing temporary files...OK Writing backup package...OK Deleting temp dir...OK Done. The new package has

Re: In a pickle with updating

2003-02-21 Thread Harry Putnam
Michael Kuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > oops, sorry, you have to remove the lock files first. > > rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db.00* Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > killall -9 rpm; rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__* Thanks posters... I missed those somewhere down the line. -- Psyche-list maili

RE: RPM issue

2003-02-21 Thread Dave Tibbals
If you have the rpmdb-redhat package installed you can do rpm -q --redhatprovides foo.so.1 or in your case libImlib.so.11. This will show the package that provides the missing item. > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Schott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1

Xsane 0.90

2003-02-21 Thread Marek
Hi I am sure this is the same for the version that comes with RedHat. I scan a pic and want to save it. By default it wants to save it as *.pnm file. So i change it to *tiff and the image is viewable in kuickshow but not by the mail clients. How would i set xsane to save as a tiff or jpg by de

RE: RPM issue

2003-02-21 Thread Andrew Schott
Thats imlib, the most recent RedHat approved version. I just tried updating the library and teh developers package, and it was a joke. I would be sitting here for over an hour trying to put up with the dependencies. And oddly enough, the rpm database says its not there, but I do a search (and an

Re: Red Hat Network Alert

2003-02-21 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 08:03:54AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Friday 21 February 2003 04:31, Mariano Wahlmann uttered: > > Does anybody knows why RedHat send mails with uptdates everyday, and > > when you execute up2date -l, apears no update available? > > RedHat been doing this since a few w

Re: RPM issue

2003-02-21 Thread Keith Winston
Andrew Schott wrote: Thats imlib, the most recent RedHat approved version. I just tried updating the library and teh developers package, and it was a joke. I would be sitting here for over an hour trying to put up with the dependencies. And oddly enough, the rpm database says its not there, but

Re: network backups with tar - cannot generate passwordless SSH key

2003-02-21 Thread A.J. Werkman
The problem why you can't reproduce my setup is because you use a 6.2 machine. I ran in the same kind of problems as you describe when I tried this a few days ago on a 7.0 machine. Has to do with the ssh configuration on the "older" redhat distros. They don't use the DSA keys by default. With o

ACL Gui for XFS filesystem

2003-02-21 Thread David . Grudek
I got XFS working on redhat with the kernel and patches from sgi.com.  I am really new to linux and am still in the process of learning linux.  I have got the understanding of normal permissions now.  I have read some howto's on acl's and can not figure it out.  I was wondering if there is a gui i

Gnome 2.2 rpms

2003-02-21 Thread Maynard Kuona
Are there any rpms for Gnome 2.2 available anywhere. Want to install 2.2 but not from source. Too long, too complex and unnecessary. -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Re: Red Hat Network Alert

2003-02-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:58:25 +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > > > Does anybody knows why RedHat send mails with uptdates everyday, and > > > when you execute up2date -l, apears no update available? > > > RedHat been doing this since a few weeks ago. >

Re: Accesing windows directories

2003-02-21 Thread daYz
Ok Dave, thanks for your help :) On Friday 21 February 2003 15:29, Dave Sherman wrote: > On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 19:34, daYz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have Windows besides Linux installed, but can I acces windows > > directrories from Linux, and if so, how/where can I acces them? > > It depends on

Re: Seeking advice on mother board

2003-02-21 Thread dsavage
> This is a little bit off-topic, but not entirely. So hopefully I will > be forgiven. > > I want to upgrade an old PC that I have with a new motherboard, new HD, > etc., in order to make a system which I will install RH8.0 on. It is > strictly for home use, but nevertheless I would like it to b

Re: Having trouble upgrading to latest kernel

2003-02-21 Thread Bill and/or Chris
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 10:57, Michael Schwendt wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 21 Feb 2003 07:31:24 -0500, Bill and/or Chris wrote: > > > # rpm -q --whatprovides ppp > > ppp-2.4.1-7 > > ppp-mppe-2.4.0-4 > > ppp-mppe is not a package from Red Hat and most likely the

Re: Red Hat Network Alert

2003-02-21 Thread Joe Klemmer
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 07:31, Mariano Wahlmann wrote: > Does anybody knows why RedHat send mails with uptdates everyday, and > when you execute up2date -l, apears no update available? > RedHat been doing this since a few weeks ago. When was the last time you ran up2date -p? -- "It's time

removing installed RPMs

2003-02-21 Thread Brian Schmidt
I've run into a couple of problems. A couple of times, while I was doing an up2date via the RHN GUI, the procedure hung. Even after sitting for over an hour, it would never regain consciousness. I noticed that some of the packages that had been downloaded for upgrading installed the new version,