Eric Wood wrote:
I have a PowerEdge 2400 - PERC2/Si - single RAID channel, Ultra2 SCSI.,
Raid-5 configuration
Currently running: RH 7.0, kernel-2.2.16-22, afaapps-2.1-0
I had a PowerEdge 1650 running 8.0 in a test configuration, striping
across the two drives. 8.0 seemed fine with one excep
Appreciate all the replies. They have helped my understanding of the
upgrade path options. I had no intention of stop using Linux, just
wanted to clarify the future paths that would need to be undertaken.
Thanks again,
Neil.
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 00:27, Samuel Flory wrote:
> Eric Wood wrote:
>
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Eric Wood wrote:
> I have a PowerEdge 2400 - PERC2/Si - single RAID channel, Ultra2 SCSI.,
> Raid-5 configuration
> Currently running: RH 7.0, kernel-2.2.16-22, afaapps-2.1-0
>
>
> Anyone have problems upgrading to RH 8.0 on such a server? Hopefully things
> will go smooth
Eric Wood wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Neil Loffhagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
With Linux I was getting
the impression, but this may be wrong, that if a Server is running fine,
then there is not so much point in upgrading from one version to
another, just need to make sure all the re
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 17:13, Neil Loffhagen wrote:
> Eric,
>
> Be very interested in how it goes. I'm curious as to the upgrade path
> in Linux (Redhat, SuSe or whatever). Coming from a Windows background,
> where it was kind of as soon as the next version of Windows came out,
> wait six months
On 10 Dec 2002, Neil Loffhagen wrote:
> Be very interested in how it goes. I'm curious as to the upgrade path
> in Linux (Redhat, SuSe or whatever). Coming from a Windows background,
> where it was kind of as soon as the next version of Windows came out,
> wait six months or so and then upgrade.
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 23:26, Eric Wood wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Neil Loffhagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > With Linux I was getting
> > the impression, but this may be wrong, that if a Server is running fine,
> > then there is not so much point in upgrading from one version to
>
- Original Message -
From: "Neil Loffhagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> With Linux I was getting
> the impression, but this may be wrong, that if a Server is running fine,
> then there is not so much point in upgrading from one version to
> another, just need to make sure all the relevant updates
Eric,
Be very interested in how it goes. I'm curious as to the upgrade path
in Linux (Redhat, SuSe or whatever). Coming from a Windows background,
where it was kind of as soon as the next version of Windows came out,
wait six months or so and then upgrade. It was a sort of done deal,
that in ti
Yeah, I'm going from 7.0 to 8.0. It's all about bad timing on the
customer's part.
-eric wood
> aside from the fact that it's not really smart to run a .0 release on
> production servers, who knows.
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyc
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 13:36, Eric Wood wrote:
> Anyone have problems upgrading to RH 8.0 on such a server? Hopefully
> things will go smooth this weekend.
aside from the fact that it's not really smart to run a .0 release on
production servers, who knows.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE
For
I have a PowerEdge 2400 - PERC2/Si - single RAID channel, Ultra2 SCSI.,
Raid-5 configuration
Currently running: RH 7.0, kernel-2.2.16-22, afaapps-2.1-0
Anyone have problems upgrading to RH 8.0 on such a server? Hopefully things
will go smooth this weekend.
-eric wood
--
Psyche-list mailing
12 matches
Mail list logo
