Joe Klemmer wrote:
GRUB is quite nice. I find that, in the long run, it's more convenient
than LILO. But you shouldn't be having problems if you stayed with
LILO, though.
2. I haven't seen any solution to my other problem with not being able
to install kernel-source-2.4.18-18.8.0 on a sy
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 15:48, Margaret_Doll wrote:
> Should I have changed my configuration program at the update?
> Will grub handle Win 2000?
GRUB is quite nice. I find that, in the long run, it's more convenient
than LILO. But you shouldn't be having problems if you stayed with
LILO,
1. I upgraded one of my systems with Windows 2000 and RedHat to 8.0.
I choose not to change from LILO to grub as no change is the
recommended option on the upgrade. The installation of 8.0 went fine.
I have tried installing kernels 2.4.18-17.8.0 and 2.4.18-18.8.0. I
used the "rpm -ivh" opti
