Re: memory issue

2002-11-05 Thread Ben
You might want to look throught the Enigma list archives, a month or less ago there was quite and long discussion on this. This one? https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/enigma-list/2002-October/017333.html That's it. In short, much invistigation to conclude that the 'problem' is not a pr

Re: memory issue

2002-11-04 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 17:05, Ben Dugdale wrote: > You might want to look throught the Enigma list archives, a month or > less ago there was quite and long discussion on this. This one? https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/enigma-list/2002-October/017333.html

Re: memory issue

2002-11-04 Thread Ben Dugdale
You might want to look throught the Enigma list archives, a month or less ago there was quite and long discussion on this. Sullysnet wrote: Issue with Redhat 8 and older releases. I boot the machine and I have 512 of memory after all is loaded (Gnome, X, etc.) I have use a little over 100 meg

Re: memory issue

2002-11-04 Thread Jesse Keating
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 18:15:08 -0500 "Sullysnet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: # Issue with Redhat 8 and older releases. I boot the machine and I # have 512 of memory after all is loaded (Gnome, X, etc.) I have use a # little over 100 megs which is fine. So I have lets say 375 free # after a few hours o

Re: memory issue

2002-11-04 Thread James McArthur
Hi, I'm sitting here with 512M.. was 768M and both memory sizes have the same 'problem'. This is actually normal behavior; the OS will grab a fair chunk of the RAM over time and allocate it back to tasks that need it. This is assuming that any software you're using isn't leaking memory, and crea

memory issue

2002-11-04 Thread Sullysnet
Issue with Redhat 8 and older releases. I boot the machine and I have 512 of memory after all is loaded (Gnome, X, etc.) I have use a little over 100 megs which is fine. So I have lets say 375 free after a few hours of it running the free memory is now 10 megs. All the memory is flushed into