Re: ifconfig, route and neat

2002-11-09 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08 Nov 2002 22:19:48 -0500, LaJchon McRight wrote: > First, My eth0 is setup by DHCP. There is no route declared in my > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 file. In recent versions of > Redhat I was able to ifconfig eth0 down then back up

Re: ifconfig, route and neat

2002-11-08 Thread LaJchon McRight
First, My eth0 is setup by DHCP. There is no route declared in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 file. In recent versions of Redhat I was able to ifconfig eth0 down then back up and the route would be restored. Second, since neat restores the route, what is neat doing or what scripts

Re: ifconfig, route and neat

2002-11-08 Thread Ha Tu
I usually declare my default in the file /etc/sysconfig/network. GATEWAY=  Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 08 Nov 2002 21:52:32 -0500LaJchon McRight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:# # I recently came across an issue with two different computers I'm# running both 8.0. When I do an ifconfig eth

Re: ifconfig, route and neat

2002-11-08 Thread Jesse Keating
On 08 Nov 2002 21:52:32 -0500 LaJchon McRight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: # # I recently came across an issue with two different computers I'm # running both 8.0. When I do an ifconfig eth0 down then ifconfig # eth0 up my default route is not available, not until I go into neat # and deactivate a

ifconfig, route and neat

2002-11-08 Thread LaJchon McRight
I recently came across an issue with two different computers I'm running both 8.0. When I do an ifconfig eth0 down then ifconfig eth0 up my default route is not available, not until I go into neat and deactivate and reactivate eth0. Is this a known issue or is there a work around? Thanks, LaJch