.
Kevin B
- Original Message -
From: "Vasyl Kenyuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM
Subject: ifconfig
> Hi!
> I'm using RedHat 8.0. After i make
>
> ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
&g
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:23:37AM -0800, Jay Crews wrote:
> Vasyl Kenyuk writes
> >
> > Hi!
> > I'm using RedHat 8.0. After i make
> >
> > ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
> >
> > seems everything to be O.k. But after n
Vasyl Kenyuk writes
>
> Hi!
> I'm using RedHat 8.0. After i make
>
> ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
>
> seems everything to be O.k. But after next boot the configuration is
> lost. How can I keep it?
> Thanks ,
Hi!
I'm using RedHat 8.0. After i make
ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
seems everything to be O.k. But after next boot the configuration is
lost. How can I keep it?
Thanks , Vasyl
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/lis
On Tue Dec 03 2002 at 23:14, "Oliver Pitzeier" wrote:
> Hi volks!
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78955
>
> I just posted this bug, because ifconfig segfaults at my machine (> 100 GB
> traffic). Maybe you folks have an idea!?
> ifc
Hi volks!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78955
I just posted this bug, because ifconfig segfaults at my machine (> 100 GB
traffic). Maybe you folks have an idea!?
ifconfig works great if I get a fresh tarball of net-tools and recompile it.
If you answer this mail, ple
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 16:19, Michael Wells wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I noticed that some of my network traffic graphs had stopped working.
> I checked ifconfig and found that the bytes counter had stopped incrementing
> for the network device. As you can see in this ifconfig dump, th
Hi,
Today I noticed that some of my network traffic graphs had stopped working.
I checked ifconfig and found that the bytes counter had stopped incrementing
for the network device. As you can see in this ifconfig dump, the TX bytes
is (2^32)-1, and is stuck there.
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08 Nov 2002 22:19:48 -0500, LaJchon McRight wrote:
> First, My eth0 is setup by DHCP. There is no route declared in my
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 file. In recent versions of
> Redhat I was able to ifconfig eth0 down the
First, My eth0 is setup by DHCP. There is no route declared in my
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 file. In recent versions of
Redhat I was able to ifconfig eth0 down then back up and the route would
be restored.
Second, since neat restores the route, what is neat doing or what
scripts
I usually declare my default in the file /etc/sysconfig/network.
GATEWAY=
Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 08 Nov 2002 21:52:32 -0500LaJchon McRight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:# # I recently came across an issue with two different computers I'm# running both 8.0. When
On 08 Nov 2002 21:52:32 -0500
LaJchon McRight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#
# I recently came across an issue with two different computers I'm
# running both 8.0. When I do an ifconfig eth0 down then ifconfig
# eth0 up my default route is not available, not until I go into neat
# and
I recently came across an issue with two different computers I'm running
both 8.0. When I do an ifconfig eth0 down then ifconfig eth0 up my
default route is not available, not until I go into neat and deactivate
and reactivate eth0. Is this a known issue or is there a work around?
T
13 matches
Mail list logo
