Re: features window managers should have

2002-10-08 Thread Havoc Pennington
Ted Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > From the above link: > > "Add some kind of mild "attraction" to window/screen edges, perhaps > only after a timeout." > > There's difference between edge resistance and edge attraction (ie > "magnatism"). In the first case the mouse has to be moved n pix

Re: features window managers should have

2002-10-08 Thread Ted Clark
Havoc Pennington wrote: James Ralston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: 5. The ability to set edge resistance (or to disable it entirely). > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81704 From the above link: "Add some kind of mild "attraction" to window/screen edges, perhaps only after

Re: features window managers should have

2002-10-08 Thread Havoc Pennington
James Ralston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 3. The ability to configure multiple workspaces, with feedback > when moving among them. I'm not sure what you mean by feedback. What I would mean by feedback is present in metacity. > 4. The ability to set up arbitrary shortcuts, inc

features window managers should have

2002-10-08 Thread James Ralston
On 4 Oct 2002, Havoc Pennington wrote: > James Ralston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Boring window manager for the adult in you. Many window > > > managers are like Marshmallow Froot Loops; Metacity is like > > > Cheerios. > > > > Speak for yourself. Not only do I want Marshmallow Froot