-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29 Nov 2002 18:59:35 -0600, Shizznik McRuube wrote:
> You guys were right of course. gcc-c++ was not installed
> I found the rpm for it and am currently trying to install it along
> with libstdc++. Actually the message I got was that gcc-c++ neede
You guys were right of course. gcc-c++ was not installed
I found the rpm for it and am currently trying to install it along with
libstdc++. Actually the message I got was that gcc-c++ needed libstdc++
to install. Strange though a window popped up said checking system
status and checking for alread
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 15:58, Shizznik McRuube wrote:
>
> At the very least, you are going to need to install:
> gcc
> gcc-c++
> cpp
> make
> glibc-devel
> glibc-kernheaders
> binutils
>
> I believe I have installed all the packages needed however I still am
> receiving errors
...
> checking wheth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29 Nov 2002 17:23:14 -0600, Shizznik McRuube wrote:
> checking for g++... no
Please show that you have the gcc-c++* package installed.
Show us the output of:
$ rpm -qa 'gcc*'
You'll most likely also need the libstdc++* packages as well as
seve
I'd run "redhat-config-packages" from root in a bash shell (terminal),
and then select at the bottom portion of the screen "Development
Packages" I think, if memory serves me correctly. That should install
everything your missing, methinks.
Chris
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 18:58, Shizznik McRuube
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 29 November 2002 06:15 pm, James Kaufman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 04:53:27PM -0600, Shizznik McRuube wrote:
> > Ok I updated autoconf and everything but:
> > makeinfo
> >
> > I couldn't find where the gcc package was on the red hat 8
How hard is it to insert the first three CDs, one at a time, and
> look for a file that begins with the string "gcc"? At the very
> worst, you'll have to look on three CDs.
>
Well it's not that hard. However, after figuring out they have been
installed and I continue to recieve errors (being new
Alright I found some gcc rpms
gcc-3.2-7.rpm and others but I'm still getting these messages.
# ./configure
loading cache ./config.cache
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes
checkin
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 04:53:27PM -0600, Shizznik McRuube wrote:
> Ok I updated autoconf and everything but:
> makeinfo
>
> I couldn't find where the gcc package was on the red hat 8 CD's
>
> What site can I find that will tell me where the gcc package and
> makeinfo package can be found. on th
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 14:53, Shizznik McRuube wrote:
> I couldn't find where the gcc package was on the red hat 8 CD's
>
> What site can I find that will tell me where the gcc package and
> makeinfo package can be found. on the cds that is.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/whichcd/
> here is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29 Nov 2002 16:53:27 -0600, Shizznik McRuube wrote:
> Ok I updated autoconf and everything but:
> makeinfo
>
> I couldn't find where the gcc package was on the red hat 8 CD's
Is it so difficult to find packages names gcc*.rpm?
> What site can I
Ok I updated autoconf and everything but:
makeinfo
I couldn't find where the gcc package was on the red hat 8 CD's
What site can I find that will tell me where the gcc package and
makeinfo package can be found. on the cds that is.
here is the output of the latest try on ./configure
# ./config
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:48:32PM -0600, Shizznik McRuube wrote:
> What about the missing autoconf will getting gcc solve that problem?
I don't know about 8, but earlier releases had it as a separate package.
up2date autoconf
.../Ed
> On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 12:19, Jesse Keating wrote:
What about the missing autoconf will getting gcc solve that problem?
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 12:19, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Friday 29 November 2002 09:56, Shizznik McRuube uttered:
> > libgcc-3.2-7
> >
> > Is that correct?
>
> No. you need "gcc" installed. up2date gcc
>
> --
> Jesse Keating
On Friday 29 November 2002 09:56, Shizznik McRuube uttered:
> libgcc-3.2-7
>
> Is that correct?
No. you need "gcc" installed. up2date gcc
--
Jesse Keating
For Web Services and Linux Consulting, Visit --> j2Solutions.net
Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org)
Was I helpful? Let others know:
http
"Check to see if you installed the compiler. Do a "rpm -qa |grep gcc". If
you don't have a version of gcc installed, then you won't be able to compile
anything."
I ran the RPM and got:
libgcc-3.2-7
Is that correct?
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/ma
Check to see if you installed the compiler. Do a "rpm -qa |grep gcc". If
you don't have a version of gcc installed, then you won't be able to compile
anything.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 11:25:13AM -0600, Shizznik McRuube wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ok First I am very new to the Linux world I just downlo
Hello,
Ok First I am very new to the Linux world I just downloaded and
installed Red Hat 8.0 last week. And have had difficulty configuring the
entire system.
I've had trouble with my printer. And after Checking the HPIJS version I
figured I needed an update to that driver.
I downloaded to
18 matches
Mail list logo
