On Sun, 2003-06-29 at 18:51, Jack Bowling wrote:
> ** Reply to message from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 30 Jun 2003
> 09:39:58 +1200
> What a fucking loser. Just made my twit filter.
I *PLONKED* the loOser after his third post.
Dave
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL P
Wrong again, it's socio-pathology 5.0
- Original Message -
From: "Craig White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 6:15 AM
Subject: Re: Troubleshooting.
> On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 11:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 11:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BS, sweetie, it ain't ZEN, it's PROOF, you don't have any. Cannot you do anything
> else but word bound
> binary thinking, your use: ME right, therefore YOU wrong, or T & F in Boolean. If it
> ain't an A it must
> be a B.
>
> Math, in case
impasse n'importe; vive l'insouciance
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Kinz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:39 AM
Subject: Re: Troubleshooting.
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 06:07:34AM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 06:07:34AM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BS, sweetie, it ain't ZEN, it's PROOF, you don't have any. Cannot you do anything
> else but word bound
Well, OK - You can't deal with the reality of the situation and you
can't seem to learn from the abstraction of the concep
BS, sweetie, it ain't ZEN, it's PROOF, you don't have any. Cannot you do anything else
but word bound
binary thinking, your use: ME right, therefore YOU wrong, or T & F in Boolean. If it
ain't an A it must
be a B.
Math, in case you don't know, is incomplete and relies on a whole bunch of rhetori
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 03:38:02PM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Enlightenment " and "Nirvana"? They are dead trees to fasten a donkey to. The
So learning means nothing to you.
Why are you here?
--
Jeff Kinz, Open-PC, Emergent Research, Hudson, MA. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
copyright 2003.
the
words. --The
House At Pooh Corner.
him.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Kinz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: Troubleshooting.
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 10:20:02AM +1200, [EMAIL PROTEC
On Monday 30 June 2003 17:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> No such word as "terminal" on it, or command as in Konqueror
On what? Where? The document? The word "Terminal" appears at the end of the
second to last sentance. Of course, "Shell Prompt" is pretty much the same.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 10:20:02AM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There's a small thing you don't understand.
Oh thats very likely actually. Especially when one considers what I was
reading
When Master Foo and his student Nubi journeyed among the sacred sites,
it was the Master's custom in
No such word as "terminal" on it, or command as in Konqueror
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Keating" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: A HUMOROUS FLAME (was Re: Troubleshooting.)
> O
On Monday 30 June 2003 15:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is that in the installation guide, no sir.
> Adrian.
Not quite the installation guide (where it doesn't belong, since it's
not an installation item), but it is in the "Getting Started Guide"
which you should have read:
http://www.redhat.c
Is that in the installation guide, no sir.
Adrian.
- Original Message -
From: "Ronald W. Heiby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 2:34 AM
Subject: Re: A HUMOROUS FLAME (was Re: Troubleshooting.)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED
There's a small thing you don't understand.
Adrian
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Kinz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: Troubleshooting.
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 07:03:10PM +1200, [
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Monday 30 June 2003 07:46, Michael Kuss wrote:
> > granted. I guess it was the first time ever I right-clicked on the
> > desktop. Windowsification of linux. I hope open source is not the only
> > difference that remains in the end ...
>
> How is
On Monday 30 June 2003 07:46, Michael Kuss wrote:
> granted. I guess it was the first time ever I right-clicked on the
> desktop. Windowsification of linux. I hope open source is not the only
> difference that remains in the end ...
How is that a "Windowsification" ? Right clicking for context
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Ronald W. Heiby wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Monday, June 30, 2003, 3:40:27 AM, Michael wrote:
> > Here I have to agree with afmee. I haven't understood why the
> > gnome-terminal icon ended up in system tools. That resembles windows,
> > whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday, June 30, 2003, 3:40:27 AM, Michael wrote:
> Here I have to agree with afmee. I haven't understood why the
> gnome-terminal icon ended up in system tools. That resembles windows,
> where the "text window", or whatever it's called, is hidden in
> not found it. First machine, with large floppies 360 KB only, in 1987. No ambition
> to turn programmer
> or hacker, just plain user.
>
> Must go to do 6th re-install tonite.
>
> Adrian.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jeff Kinz" <[EMAIL PROTE
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: Troubleshooting.
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:42:07AM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Ta, I know, but windows outlook won't let one have them at 72 letters,
>
> Yes it wil
On 29 Jun 2003 19:02:37 -0500
Scott Kindley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> insightfully noted:
>I apologize in advance to list members who disapprove of a flame. But
>this was too fun to pass up. So enjoy!
>I would think someone with Honors in English would make sure to check
>the grammer before sending ema
On 29 Jun 2003, Scott Kindley wrote:
> > The help supplied by REDHAT is nomothetic. You probably won't find that word in
> > a standard dictionary, haha.
>
> Actaully it is in Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary. One can also
> find it by using /usr/bin/gnome-dictionary, although your path
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:42:07AM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ta, I know, but windows outlook won't let one have them at 72 letters,
Yes it will -
This document :
> > There are a number of other conventions which are neccesary to adhere to
> > if you want to be successful at getting he
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: Troubleshooting.
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 06:50:25AM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello "afme".
>
> You are having trouble getting help here because you are using the tools
> provided incorrectly.
>
I apologize in advance to list members who disapprove of a flame. But
this was too fun to pass up. So enjoy!
On Sun, 2003-06-29 at 13:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I happen to be a qualified expert in communication,
(snip)
The you should realize that communication is receiver based and tha
** Reply to message from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 30 Jun 2003
09:39:58 +1200
> Haha, finished writing and a power failure; crash! Since you won't understand
> anyhow, I'll suggest you
> put it in two words, you can probably guess.
>
> You were played for a sucker, just w
orry* mate. Try Red Dots, Oz and l-genius, haha, very
congenial folk..
==
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Keating" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: Troubleshooting.
> On Sunday 29 June 2003
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 06:50:25AM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello "afme".
You are having trouble getting help here because you are using the tools
provided incorrectly.
For example, the best format to use for emails here is plain text,
wrapped at 72 columns. Your lines are too long and a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 06:50:25 +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I happen to be a qualified expert in communication, In English, with honours,
> gained in a NU Zilland
> Uni to boot. Funny that. YOU don't understand, so blame ME, Freud calls that
> p
On Sunday 29 June 2003 11:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Cher Michael,
>
> I happen to be a qualified expert in communication, In English, with
> honours, gained in a NU Zilland Uni to boot. Funny that. YOU don't
> understand, so blame ME, Freud calls that projection. VERY common and
> typical.
W
Cher Michael,
I happen to be a qualified expert in communication, In English, with honours, gained
in a NU Zilland
Uni to boot. Funny that. YOU don't understand, so blame ME, Freud calls that
projection. VERY common and
typical. Also the way one gets one's head bitten off when offending against
31 matches
Mail list logo
