John Nall wrote:
This may be a dumb question, with the answer glaringly obvious. But I
hate to make assumptions. Doing so has bit me in the past.
Using RHN I have updated one of my three RH8.0 systems. All three of
them are on a LAN, at my home. Since this updating is kind of a
courtesy fr
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 08:41:10PM -0500, John Nall wrote:
> This may be a dumb question, with the answer glaringly obvious. But I hate
> to make assumptions. Doing so has bit me in the past.
>
> Using RHN I have updated one of my three RH8.0 systems. All three of them
> are on a LAN, at my h
At 08:41 PM 2/16/2003 -0500, you wrote:
This may be a dumb question, with the answer glaringly obvious. But I
hate to make assumptions. Doing so has bit me in the past.
Using RHN I have updated one of my three RH8.0 systems. All three of them
are on a LAN, at my home. Since this updating is
On Sun Feb 16 2003 at 20:41, John Nall wrote:
> Using RHN I have updated one of my three RH8.0 systems. All three of them
> are on a LAN, at my home. Since this updating is kind of a courtesy from
> Redhat, by virtue of my buying RH8.0 from them, I can only update one
> machine with RHN (or so I
This may be a dumb question, with the answer glaringly obvious. But I hate
to make assumptions. Doing so has bit me in the past.
Using RHN I have updated one of my three RH8.0 systems. All three of them
are on a LAN, at my home. Since this updating is kind of a courtesy from
Redhat, by virt
