Thanks Thomas,
>> For mozilla at leats it would be 1.3a, 1.3b, 1.3rc4, then 1.3 but I
don't rember seeing and rc's :) <<
I don't know of any mozilla rc's either. My mistake, perhaps, for mixing
examples. I didn't want to confuse the thread. I'd hoped that there was
a "general rule" that I didn
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
>
> Charles wrote:
> > James Jones wrote:
> >> package mozilla-nspr-1.3b-0_xft (which is newer than
> >> mozilla-nspr-1.3-0_rh8_xft) is already installed
>
> >> I expect I'll just rpm -e the 1.3b versions and then just rpm -i the
> >> new stuff, but I'm cu
Charles wrote:
James Jones wrote:
package mozilla-nspr-1.3b-0_xft (which is newer than
mozilla-nspr-1.3-0_rh8_xft) is already installed
I expect I'll just rpm -e the 1.3b versions and then just rpm -i the
new stuff, but I'm curious. Has anyone else run into this?
rpm -Uvh --force mozilla-*.rp
Cliff Kent wrote:
I'd bet that the real chronology is:
1.3rc3
1.3
1.3a
1.3b
For mozilla at leats it would be 1.3a, 1.3b, 1.3rc4, then 1.3
but I don't rember seeing and rc's :)
For other software your order is more likely correct.
-Thomas
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https:
Thanks Greg,
>> Did you try uninstalling the older package? ... <<
No not yet. I'm not actually sure which is older.
I'll try again, but as I said before "further experiments will be on a
test box not the one on my desk"... What?... Me chicken?... YES!
But, seriously...
I have a long standin
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: problem upgrading to Mozilla 1.3
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> Strictly guessing <<
>
> Me too. But, I had an install problem the other day (not mozilla) and
> I'd like to add a line to your example.
>
> >
>> Strictly guessing <<
Me too. But, I had an install problem the other day (not mozilla) and
I'd like to add a line to your example.
>> Looking at the following list of files,
>> 1.3
>> 1.3a
>> 1.3b
OK, but what should I think if the list is:
1.3
1.3a
1.3b
1.3rc3
Should an 1.3rc3 go to the end
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 15 March 2003 05:42 pm, James Jones wrote:
> I have Mozilla 1.3b, and found out today that Mozilla 1.3 is available
> for downloading. I cheer to myself, ftp the RPMs over, and do the
> appropriate rpm -U... and get the message
>
> package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 15 March 2003 06:58 pm, Michael Fratoni wrote:
> On Saturday 15 March 2003 06:44 pm, Charles wrote:
> > James Jones wrote:
> > > I have Mozilla 1.3b, and found out today that Mozilla 1.3 is
> > > available for downloading. I cheer to mysel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 15 March 2003 06:44 pm, Charles wrote:
> James Jones wrote:
> > I have Mozilla 1.3b, and found out today that Mozilla 1.3 is
> > available for downloading. I cheer to myself, ftp the RPMs over, and
> > do the appropriate rpm -U... and get
James Jones wrote:
I have Mozilla 1.3b, and found out today that Mozilla 1.3 is available
for downloading. I cheer to myself, ftp the RPMs over, and do the
appropriate rpm -U... and get the message
package mozilla-nspr-1.3b-0_xft (which is newer than
mozilla-nspr-1.3-0_rh8_xft) is already inst
11 matches
Mail list logo
