On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 22:19:26 -0500, Michael Fratoni wrote
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sunday 23 March 2003 08:44 pm, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> > I have these java components installed:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wormscan-1.5.7-release]# rpm -qa | grep -i java
> > gcc-java-3
On 19:44 23 Mar 2003, Mike Vanecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I have these java components installed:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wormscan-1.5.7-release]# rpm -qa | grep -i java
| gcc-java-3.2-7
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wormscan-1.5.7-release]# rpm -qa | grep -i j2
| j2re-1.4.1_02-fcs
| j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 23 March 2003 08:44 pm, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> I have these java components installed:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wormscan-1.5.7-release]# rpm -qa | grep -i java
> gcc-java-3.2-7
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wormscan-1.5.7-release]# rpm -qa | grep -i j2
>
Sun and Blackdown work very closely together: Blackdown does the "raw"
Linux port of Java from Sun's common source base, which Sun then
packages, tests and distributes. If you want to tinker with the
runtime, fix bugs or have a strong licensing religion then use
Blackdown's version; if you want s
On Wednesday 01 January 2003 02:36 pm, Joe Klemmer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 14:49, Mark Guzzo wrote:
> > I'm in the process of downloading the j2re-1_4_1_01 and the
> > j2sdk-1_4_1_01 from SUN, and was wondering which is "better", Sun's
> > or Blackdown?
>
> Doesn't really matter for an
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 14:49, Mark Guzzo wrote:
> I'm in the process of downloading the j2re-1_4_1_01 and the
> j2sdk-1_4_1_01 from SUN, and was wondering which is "better", Sun's or
> Blackdown?
Doesn't really matter for anything I'm doing with java (which is very
little). The one from
Am Don, 2002-12-12 um 17.49 schrieb Ted Wager:
> Thanks for the reply...I went to the java test page and the applet
> came up as sort of
> jigsaw piece and it told me "java-applets was not enabled"...
Seems to me that you did not activate Java support in Mozilla. In the
release notes you will
On 12 Dec 2002, Bob Parry wrote:
> How does one get Java working under RH 8.0? It worked fine under 7.3
> but after the upgrade it does not work. I have tried the steps form
> Installation of Java 1.31. in Red Hat found at
> http://www.xtec.es/recursos/clic/jclic/linux_eng.htm
>
> but near the
Peter Boy wrote:
Am Don, 2002-12-12 um 14.53 schrieb Ted Wager:
Could anyone tell me how I can view jave applets in Mozilla...I went to
the java test page and
whilst java was ok the applets could not be viewed..
What about error messages? Or what is happening instead of the java
applets
Am Don, 2002-12-12 um 14.53 schrieb Ted Wager:
> Could anyone tell me how I can view jave applets in Mozilla...I went to
> the java test page and
> whilst java was ok the applets could not be viewed..
What about error messages? Or what is happening instead of the java
applets?
Did you install th
I have Java 1.4.1 working well.
I use jEdit and Eclipse qith it.
Find it at java.sun.com
-jec
Bob Parry wrote:
How does one get Java working under RH 8.0? It worked fine under 7.3
but after the upgrade it does not work. I have tried the steps form
Installation of Java 1.31. in Red Hat found at
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 04:37, anthony baldwin wrote:
> Hey,
> What the heck does this mean? I was trying to run a java hangman game.
>
> [root@localhost programs]# java -jar swingman.jar
> Warning: -jar not understood. Ignoring.
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: swingma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 06 October 2002 12:27 am, Michael Fratoni wrote:
ARGH!
> I had no difficulty getting the java plugin to work with the stock
> mozilla. To install, I:
> downloaded the j2re-1_4_1-linux-i586-rpm.bin file
> chmod a+x j2re-1_4_1-linux-i586-rpm
13 matches
Mail list logo
