Re: gnome-terminal

2003-03-18 Thread Keith Nasman
I'm not a vi fan, but why would I fire up a whole editor to do a shells job? I use emacs but I wouldn't fire it up to list out files and such. Aterm is providing the shell at the moment. Keith > vi > > RSalles > On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 16:36:56 -0800 (PST) > "Keith Nasman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: gnome-terminal

2003-03-17 Thread Renato Salles
vi RSalles On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 16:36:56 -0800 (PST) "Keith Nasman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now it appears that it is totally messed up. When I run it it immediately > seg faults. If I click on the "submit bug report" nothing happens. > > /var/log/messages doesn't give me any clues. The gnom

Re: gnome-terminal is terminally ill :)

2003-01-04 Thread Tommy McNeely
my fault.. I am running psyche on my desktop and phoebe on my vmware machine.. I got the aliases confused :) Tommy On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 20:47, Havoc Pennington wrote: > On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 08:05:50PM -0700, Tommy McNeely wrote: > > # rpm -U Xft*i386.rpm > > > > (really really long list of t

Re: gnome-terminal is terminally ill :)

2003-01-04 Thread Havoc Pennington
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 08:05:50PM -0700, Tommy McNeely wrote: > # rpm -U Xft*i386.rpm > > (really really long list of this requires that) > > Suggested resolutions: > XFree86-libs-4.2.99.2-0.20021217.0.i386.rpm > Oh, are you running phoebe? Yeah those RPMs will probably not work. Yo

Re: gnome-terminal is terminally ill :)

2003-01-04 Thread Tommy McNeely
# rpm -U Xft*i386.rpm (really really long list of this requires that) Suggested resolutions: XFree86-libs-4.2.99.2-0.20021217.0.i386.rpm Tommy On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 18:48, Havoc Pennington wrote: > On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:56:50PM -0700, Tommy McNeely wrote: > > I guess I will p

Re: gnome-terminal is terminally ill :)

2003-01-04 Thread Havoc Pennington
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:58:52PM -0800, Nathan G. Grennan wrote: > On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 17:48, Havoc Pennington wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:56:50PM -0700, Tommy McNeely wrote: > > > I guess I will post a bug (as soon as I remember my login) ... but has > > > anyone else gotten that be

Re: gnome-terminal is terminally ill :)

2003-01-04 Thread Nathan G. Grennan
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 17:48, Havoc Pennington wrote: > On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:56:50PM -0700, Tommy McNeely wrote: > > I guess I will post a bug (as soon as I remember my login) ... but has > > anyone else gotten that behavior? I can do "ALT+F2" and use xterm for > > now :) > > It's probably j

Re: gnome-terminal is terminally ill :)

2003-01-04 Thread Havoc Pennington
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:56:50PM -0700, Tommy McNeely wrote: > I guess I will post a bug (as soon as I remember my login) ... but has > anyone else gotten that behavior? I can do "ALT+F2" and use xterm for > now :) It's probably just the Xft memory leak caused by lack of the RENDER extension -

Re: gnome terminal problem

2002-11-11 Thread Miloslav Trmac
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 02:23:54AM +, mr_fixer wrote: > gnome-terminal -working-directory= > > is not working. Known gnome-terminal bug IIRC. Mirek

Re: gnome terminal problem

2002-11-11 Thread mr_fixer
hi, i tried it and it also not working either.. the scripts are available at http://g-scripts.sourceforge.net/ it is the "gnome2-terminal-here" script did anyone else has it working ?? should i file a bug report? cheers On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 02:45, Hal Burgiss wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at

Re: gnome terminal problem

2002-11-10 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 02:23:54AM +, mr_fixer wrote: > hi, > > i downloaded and installed a nautilus script that opens a terminal in > the current dir. > > its not working because > > gnome-terminal -working-directory= > > is not working. > > any help?? Assuming its supposed to c

Re: Gnome-terminal font frustrations

2002-10-27 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 14:20, James McArthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For Gnome2 and fontconfig and Xft2, you really only need to copy the > fonts into one of the font directories (ie ~/.fonts) and run fc-cache. On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 07:20, Michael Fratoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Frida

Re: gnome-terminal settings

2002-10-27 Thread Dale
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 03:16:04PM -0400, Tom Cooper wrote: > Since the upgrade, gnome-terminal has been making me a little crazy. > The new version doesn't play friendly with the RS6000s at the office. > > When I run vi on an RS6000 the arrow keys don't work. This is odd, > because in previous

Re: Gnome-terminal font frustrations: Still!!

2002-10-26 Thread John P Verel
On 10/25/02 14:13 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: > All you have to do is restart X. I tried the same thing (make ~/.fonts > and unzip some x fonts into there). Perhaps you don't even need to > restart X, but logging off and back on is a good start. Well, absolutely nothing works. I put ALL the misc

Re: Gnome-terminal font frustrations

2002-10-25 Thread Michael Fratoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 25 October 2002 12:43 am, Iain Buchanan wrote: > On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 23:20, Michael Fratoni > > Shot in the dark, as I haven't tried this (and I don't use Gnome), > > but did you run fc-cache? > > You might try /usr/bin/fc-cache -fv /path/

Re: Gnome-terminal font frustrations

2002-10-25 Thread Patrick
Iirc the directory should be .fonts and not fonts ^^^ (dot) Cheers, Patrick On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 03:42, John P Verel wrote: > > On 10/24/02 20:59 -0400, John P Verel wrote: > > > > On 10/24/02 10:40 -0400, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote: > > > > > You can find it by grep

Re: Gnome-terminal font frustrations

2002-10-25 Thread James McArthur
Hi, For Gnome2 and fontconfig and Xft2, you really only need to copy the fonts into one of the font directories (ie ~/.fonts) and run fc-cache. James On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 14:13, Iain Buchanan wrote: > All you have to do is restart X. I tried the same thing (make ~/.fonts > and unzip some x fon

Re: Gnome-terminal font frustrations

2002-10-25 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 23:20, Michael Fratoni > On Thursday 24 October 2002 09:42 pm, John P Verel wrote: > > > Just tried it and does not seem to work: > > > > I created ~./fonts, copied both files shown above to it, gunzipped > > same. File contents are now: > > > > total 528 > > drwxrwxr-x2

Re: Gnome-terminal font frustrations

2002-10-24 Thread Nalin Dahyabhai
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 11:20:49PM -0400, Michael Fratoni wrote: > On Thursday 24 October 2002 09:42 pm, John P Verel wrote: > > Just tried it and does not seem to work: > > > > I created ~./fonts, copied both files shown above to it, gunzipped > > same. File contents are now: > > > > total 528 > >

Re: Gnome-terminal font frustrations

2002-10-24 Thread Michael Fratoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 24 October 2002 09:42 pm, John P Verel wrote: > Just tried it and does not seem to work: > > I created ~./fonts, copied both files shown above to it, gunzipped > same. File contents are now: > > total 528 > drwxrwxr-x2 john john

Re: Gnome-terminal font frustrations

2002-10-24 Thread Nalin Dahyabhai
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 08:39:14PM -0400, John P Verel wrote: > On 10/23/02 12:42 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote: > > https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/psyche-list/2002-October/000585.html > > https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/psyche-list/2002-October/002797.html > > Which file contains > -mi

Re: Gnome-terminal font frustrations

2002-10-23 Thread John P Verel
On 10/23/02 12:42 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote: > > Hi, > > https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/psyche-list/2002-October/000585.html > https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/psyche-list/2002-October/002797.html > > Havoc Which file contains -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal-20-200-75-75-c-100-iso8859

Re: Gnome-terminal font frustrations

2002-10-23 Thread Havoc Pennington
Hi, https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/psyche-list/2002-October/000585.html https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/psyche-list/2002-October/002797.html Havoc