Nick H Johnson wrote:
> whats the cleanest way to reinstall sh-utils? If thats what I want to
> do to get /bin/su back where it belongs.
for the archives,
I used:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# apt-get install --reinstall sh-utils
and all is well.
Thank you Jakub and Tim!
nick
--
Please avoid sendi
Nick H Johnson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] nick]$ rpm -q sh-utils
> sh-utils-2.0.12-3
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] nick]$ rpm -V sh-utils
> missing/bin/su
whats the cleanest way to reinstall sh-utils? If thats what I want to
do to get /bin/su back where it belongs.
thanks
nick
--
Please avoid se
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 10:44, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> rpm -q sh-utils
> rpm -V sh-utils
>
> Jakub
[EMAIL PROTECTED] nick]$ rpm -q sh-utils
sh-utils-2.0.12-3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] nick]$ rpm -V sh-utils
missing/bin/su
Nick
--
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See ht
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:44:30AM -0400, Nick H Johnson wrote:
> Tim wrote:
> > The 'su' command is /bin/su. Perhaps /bin dropped out of your $PATH
> > for some reason?
>
> Nope, /bin is still in my $PATH however su isn't in /bin. odd.
> thanks Tim,
> any other ideas?
rpm -V sh-utils
Tim.
*/
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:44:30AM -0400, Nick H Johnson wrote:
> Tim wrote:
> > The 'su' command is /bin/su. Perhaps /bin dropped out of your $PATH
> > for some reason?
>
> Nope, /bin is still in my $PATH however su isn't in /bin. odd.
> thanks Tim,
> any other ideas?
rpm -q sh-utils
rpm -V sh-
Tim wrote:
> The 'su' command is /bin/su. Perhaps /bin dropped out of your $PATH
> for some reason?
Nope, /bin is still in my $PATH however su isn't in /bin. odd.
thanks Tim,
any other ideas?
Nick
--
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-wo
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:32:11AM -0400, Nick H Johnson wrote:
> I recently for the first time used up2date to update everything on one
> of my systems (I am weary of automatically updating anything). After
> the update bash no longer recognizes the "su" command from a shell
> prompt. I'v
