On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 04:17, David Durst wrote:
> I am not sure if open office is still Java depended in some way.
>
> But I recently discovered after installing the J2SDK 1.4.1 that
> it ceased to function.
>
> Does anyone have any insight???
I'm not sure exactly what your problem is, but I hav
> Let's take Eclipse who is nothing more that a glorified editor written
> in Java. It takes some 30 CPU seconds just to start in a 450 MHz
> K6/2. Isn't that slow enough?
>
> JFM
As I said GUI is not very good in Java, but making a blanket statement
that Java is s
> On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 16:45, JD wrote:
>
>> I remember soffice 5.1 & 5.2 that was so java..., thanks goodness it's
>> gone!
>
> Interesting thing then that soffice 5.x is (and 6 still is) written in
> C++. It's just the scripting engine which uses the Java runtime.
>
> Klaasjan
Then I am wonderi
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 16:45, JD wrote:
> I remember soffice 5.1 & 5.2 that was so java..., thanks goodness it's
> gone!
Interesting thing then that soffice 5.x is (and 6 still is) written in
C++. It's just the scripting engine which uses the Java runtime.
Klaasjan
--
Psyche-list mailing lis
Le mar 28/01/2003 à 22:35, David Durst a écrit :
> H, the amazing thing is a I have now read all of the posts
> in reply to my original and still don't have a clear view if
> anyone else has experience this issue.
>
> I would really not devel into the politics of Java on Linux as
> I have befo
H, the amazing thing is a I have now read all of the posts
in reply to my original and still don't have a clear view if
anyone else has experience this issue.
I would really not devel into the politics of Java on Linux as
I have before, but let me say this I think it is both
Sun and Redhats at
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 06:23, Mario Torre wrote:
If 'java' were an adjective, than that should mean slow, no alias fonts
that are so ugly, ugly colors here and there; in short, it has a kind of
primitive look.
It might be very funny for me to say that because I was also born in
that island, Java;
Il mar, 2003-01-28 alle 13:47, Jean Francois Martinez ha scritto:
> Le mar 28/01/2003 à 11:26, Mario Torre a écrit :
> If my memory is good it is related to Java licensing. In other words
> Sun not RedHat is the guilty.
Yes, this is true, in fact I'm not accusing Red Hat to be guilty of
anythin
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 03:07:52PM +0100, Patrick wrote:
> I have not yet seen a 1.0.2 srpm on rawhide or somewhere else. Truetype
> Fonts and the menus in 1.0.2 look quite good although I don't know if
> that should be classified as "supporting anti-aliasing". Get the tarball
> and the specfile fr
I have not yet seen a 1.0.2 srpm on rawhide or somewhere else. Truetype
Fonts and the menus in 1.0.2 look quite good although I don't know if
that should be classified as "supporting anti-aliasing". Get the tarball
and the specfile from the 1.0.1-8 srpm on rawhide and give it a shot if
you have a r
> Iirc OpenOffice.org version 1.0.2 enjoys significant speed increases
> compared to version 1.0.1.
Do you know of a RH8 build that has anti-aliasing?
-jec
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 13:47, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
>
> Given how long OpenOffice takes to load and how slow it is at relatively
> trivial tasks I shudder when thinking about a "complete"
> openoffice and still more when thinking that the missing parts would
> be i Java. Until the perform
Le mar 28/01/2003 à 11:26, Mario Torre a écrit :
> Il mar, 2003-01-28 alle 10:17, David Durst ha scritto:
> > I am not sure if open office is still Java depended in some way.
> >
> > But I recently discovered after installing the J2SDK 1.4.1 that
> > it ceased to function.
> >
> > Does anyone hav
Il mar, 2003-01-28 alle 10:17, David Durst ha scritto:
> I am not sure if open office is still Java depended in some way.
>
> But I recently discovered after installing the J2SDK 1.4.1 that
> it ceased to function.
>
> Does anyone have any insight???
If you use the default OpenOffice shipped in
14 matches
Mail list logo
