Re: Dynamic E-Mail Signatures

2002-12-15 Thread James McArthur
Hi, Oh no, my code has been released into the wild ... ;) James On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 09:34, Iain Buchanan wrote: > On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 05:23, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I noticed that Rick and a few other people are using dynamic e-mail signatures > > for this list, I was

Re: Dynamic E-Mail Signatures

2002-12-15 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 05:23, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that Rick and a few other people are using dynamic e-mail signatures > for this list, I was wondering how I can do the same using Evolution. Please let > me know, thanks. Surely this is the ultimate way! A signature

Re: Dynamic E-Mail Signatures

2002-12-14 Thread Joe Klemmer
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 14:53, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote: > I noticed that Rick and a few other people are using dynamic e-mail signatures > for this list, I was wondering how I can do the same using Evolution. Please let > me know, thanks. This is one way to do it. Maybe not the most ele

Re: Dynamic E-Mail Signatures

2002-12-13 Thread jdow
From: "Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Around Fri,Dec 13 2002, at 11:53, Jonathan M. Slivko, wrote: > >Hello, > > > >I noticed that Rick and a few other people are using dynamic e-mail signatures > >for this list, I was wondering how I can do the same using Evolution. Please let > >me know, thanks.

Re: Dynamic E-Mail Signatures

2002-12-13 Thread Chris Spencer
Wellif you mean that people have rotating sigs of some sortwell then I can help you. My sigs rotate on a schedule(I have spare CPUwhy not) I made a little script: #!/bin/csh @ numsigs=`ls -l /home/cspencer/sigs/sig* | wc | awk -- '{print $1}'` @ num=`cat /home/cspencer/sigs/.l

Re: Dynamic E-Mail Signatures

2002-12-13 Thread Roger
Around Fri,Dec 13 2002, at 11:53, Jonathan M. Slivko, wrote: >Hello, > >I noticed that Rick and a few other people are using dynamic e-mail signatures >for this list, I was wondering how I can do the same using Evolution. Please let >me know, thanks. > I'm not sure how Rick does it, I didn't se