RE: port 1 & 137

2003-01-27 Thread Buck
tomorrow... correction, today. Good luck Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hans Scheffers Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 4:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: port 1 & 137 Port 1434 was some kind of memory resident M$ Sql Se

Re: port 1 & 137

2003-01-27 Thread Hans Scheffers
Port 1434 was some kind of memory resident M$ Sql Server virus You can look it up at the symantec site or any other anti-virus site. It has cost me half my weekend, because of the traffic generated at our provider... our sites were completely blocked. It took them about 11 hours to solve the damn

Re: port 1 & 137

2003-01-26 Thread jdow
From: "Tom Diehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, jdow wrote: > > > From: "Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > What ports are the popular ones for this attack we are under? > > > > 1434 and 137. What bothers me is the number of ICMP probes coming through > > of late. That's unusual; and,

Re: port 1 & 137

2003-01-26 Thread Tom Diehl
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, jdow wrote: > From: "Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > What ports are the popular ones for this attack we are under? > > 1434 and 137. What bothers me is the number of ICMP probes coming through > of late. That's unusual; and, I don't know what it is yet. They seem to be > ori

Re: port 1 & 137

2003-01-26 Thread jdow
From: "Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > What ports are the popular ones for this attack we are under? 1434 and 137. What bothers me is the number of ICMP probes coming through of late. That's unusual; and, I don't know what it is yet. They seem to be originating almost anywhere. {^_^} -- Psyche-l

Re: port 1 & 137

2003-01-26 Thread jdow
From: "Stephen Carville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sunday 26 January 2003 05:12 pm, Buck wrote: > > I was wondering what they might be. I think 137 could be the > microsoft > > messenger popup ads looking for victims, but I don't know what port > 1 > > http://www.cert.org/incident_notes/IN-98.0

RE: port 1 & 137

2003-01-26 Thread Buck
What ports are the popular ones for this attack we are under? Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Norman E. Brake, Jr. Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 9:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: port 1 & 137 I think 137 is the Micro

RE: port 1 & 137

2003-01-26 Thread Norman E. Brake, Jr.
but I don't know what port 1 > does. > > Buck > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On Behalf Of Dave Sherman > Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 8:02 PM > To: RedHat 8.0 > Subject: Re: port 1 & 137 >

RE: port 1 & 137

2003-01-26 Thread Buck
Thanks Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen Carville Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 8:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: port 1 & 137 On Sunday 26 January 2003 05:12 pm, Buck wrote: > I was wondering what they might

Re: port 1 & 137

2003-01-26 Thread Stephen Carville
On Sunday 26 January 2003 05:12 pm, Buck wrote: > I was wondering what they might be. I think 137 could be the microsoft > messenger popup ads looking for victims, but I don't know what port 1 http://www.cert.org/incident_notes/IN-98.01.irix.html -- Stephen Carville http://www.heronforge.net/

RE: port 1 & 137

2003-01-26 Thread Buck
02 PM To: RedHat 8.0 Subject: Re: port 1 & 137 On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 18:32, Buck wrote: > My firewall is being hit by a number of different IP addresses (with one > exception). > > Those looking for port 1 are from source port 761 and those destined for > port 137 are from

Re: port 1 & 137

2003-01-26 Thread Dave Sherman
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 18:32, Buck wrote: > My firewall is being hit by a number of different IP addresses (with one > exception). > > Those looking for port 1 are from source port 761 and those destined for > port 137 are from source ports 1036 -1039 > > The one exception to the list of ips is 21