Ah - after scanning that document I am happy I am using "NIST TimeSet". It
is a proper full NTP implementation rather than the simplified version MS
implemented. It is also not quite so "fussy" about stratum issues.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Powell, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Woo
Mike Chambers wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: ntp sync'ing
Quite assuredly. Unless you are coupled to a GPS clock of some sort the
local host sh
9:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ntp sync'ing
Ron, they are both the same address. Did you intend this?
{^_^}
From: "Powell, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> First, look at this article (if you haven't already):
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q314054
>
> Next, you may want to take a look at this whitepaper:
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q314054
Ron, the
From: "Mike Chambers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Quite assuredly. Unless you are coupled to a GPS clock of some sort the
> > local host should be setup as running at stratum 10 if it is "end of the
> > line". If it serves other machines and couples to stratum 2 serv
First, look at this article (if you haven't already):
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q314054
Next, you may want to take a look at this whitepaper:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q314054
The stuff at the top of the whitepaper is informative, but
- Original Message -
From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: ntp sync'ing
> Quite assuredly. Unless you are coupled to a GPS clock of some sort the
> local host should be setup as ru
From: "Mike Chambers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I finally got my ntpd running and listening on my network for sync'ing.
But
> I get an error when doing it..
>
> "The time sample was rejected because: The peer's stratum is less than the
> host's stratum."
>
> Is there something on the server end/config
