-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:49:19 -0500, Paul Hamm wrote:
> But you are ignoring alot in the examples I showed.
No, I don't.
In my original reply I just pointed out that "chkconfig --list foo"
saves some typing. I regret my second reply which you've ign
Message-
From: Michael Schwendt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri, December 13, 2002 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Telnet with RH8.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 07:51:21 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Hehe. :) Consider yourself luck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 07:51:21 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Hehe. :) Consider yourself lucky. But it's not convincing enough.
> > Watch this:
> >
> > $ /sbin/chkconfig --list | grep news
> > $ /sbin/chkconfig --list | grep nntp
> > $ /sbin/chkconfig
On Friday 13 December 2002 07:13, Michael Schwendt uttered:
> Hehe. :) Consider yourself lucky. But it's not convincing enough.
> Watch this:
>
> $ /sbin/chkconfig --list | grep news
> $ /sbin/chkconfig --list | grep nntp
> $ /sbin/chkconfig --list leafnode
> leafnodeon
Huh? what does thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:43:51 -0500, Paul Hamm wrote:
> Yes but my way always works. Which in the long run will save you
> typing and frustration.
>
> ]$ chkconfig --list http
> error reading information on service http: No such file or directory
> ]
5:off 6:off
ypxfrd 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schwendt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thu, December 12, 2002 5:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Telnet with RH8.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
On Thursday 12 December 2002 15:06, Craig White wrote:
> I would swear that port 22 was for ssh & 23 was for telnet
Whoops, you're right there. I've been using ssh too long (;
--
Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE
For Web Services and Linux Consulting, Visit --> j2Solutions.net
Mondo DevTeam (www.mondores
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 15:18, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thursday 12 December 2002 13:53, John Nall wrote:
> > Right now, I have telnet installed. I can start the daemons.I have two
> > machines on an LAN, both running 8.0, and I can ping from one to the other
> > and from the other to the one.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 17:11:41 -0500, Paul Hamm wrote:
> By default telnet is disabled. Getting telnet to respond should not
> be to difficult the real question is why don't you use ssh instead as
> it is secure. I understand you are in a protected en
port.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hamm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thu, December 12, 2002 5:12 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Telnet with RH8.0
By default telnet is disabled. Getting telnet to respond should not be to
difficult the real question is why don
On Thursday 12 December 2002 13:53, John Nall wrote:
> Right now, I have telnet installed. I can start the daemons.I have two
> machines on an LAN, both running 8.0, and I can ping from one to the other
> and from the other to the one. I have my firewall set properly to allow
> them to talk t
By default telnet is disabled. Getting telnet to respond should not be to
difficult the real question is why don't you use ssh instead as it is
secure. I understand you are in a protected environment but I have found
that safe computing starts at home. All I use now is ssh. To start telnet
all
12 matches
Mail list logo
