RE: Messenger Poppups

2003-01-26 Thread Pavel Rozenboim
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Carville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sun, January 26, 2003 5:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Messenger Poppups > > > On Saturday 25 January 2003 08:50 pm, Buck wrote: > > Hmm, you may have something

Re: Messenger Poppups

2003-01-26 Thread Stephen Carville
- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On Behalf Of Stephen Carville > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 11:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Messenger Poppups > > On Saturday 25 January 2003 01:49 pm, Jay Crews wrote: > > Buck writes > >

RE: Messenger Poppups

2003-01-25 Thread Buck
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Messenger Poppups On Saturday 25 January 2003 01:49 pm, Jay Crews wrote: > Buck writes > > > > It is obvious from the replies that I am getting that the Linux crowd is > > not familiar with the problem. This isn't a put-down, just the bliss of &g

Re: Messenger Poppups

2003-01-25 Thread Stephen Carville
On Saturday 25 January 2003 01:49 pm, Jay Crews wrote: > Buck writes > > > > It is obvious from the replies that I am getting that the Linux crowd is > > not familiar with the problem. This isn't a put-down, just the bliss of > > not having to experience the problem. > > That's probably

RE: Messenger Poppups

2003-01-25 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 15:00, Buck wrote: > I do have a firewall. I learned really quick how to stop the problem. > My original question was whether or not Redhat had a similar problem. I > have learned that the problem is unique to "windoz". > It occurred to me later that a useful piece of ad

RE: Messenger Poppups

2003-01-25 Thread Buck
nds. Of course, I have a bit of a learning curve to get past my windoz habits. Thanks Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jay Crews Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 4:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Messenger Poppups Buck wri

Re: Messenger Poppups

2003-01-25 Thread Jay Crews
Buck writes > > It is obvious from the replies that I am getting that the Linux crowd is > not familiar with the problem. This isn't a put-down, just the bliss of > not having to experience the problem. That's probably because this is a RedHat Linux mailing list. We know what M$ is. Some

RE: Messenger Poppups

2003-01-24 Thread Buck
It is obvious from the replies that I am getting that the Linux crowd is not familiar with the problem. This isn't a put-down, just the bliss of not having to experience the problem. A new form of spam has emerged through a service automatically installed and enabled on Microsoft Windows produc