At 11:15 AM 11/19/2003 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 23:23, John Ketchum wrote:
> At 08:49 AM 11/18/2003 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> >On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 02:36, John Ketchum wrote:
> > > I went away for a week, and while I was away, apt-get upgraded glibc
> > > packages to 2
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 23:23, John Ketchum wrote:
> At 08:49 AM 11/18/2003 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> >On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 02:36, John Ketchum wrote:
> > > I went away for a week, and while I was away, apt-get upgraded glibc
> > > packages to 2.3.2-4.80.8 on my RH8 machine. X is now broken
> >
Subject: Re: Problems with new glibc
|
>---|
At 08:49 AM 11/18/2003 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
>On
At 08:49 AM 11/18/2003 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 02:36, John Ketchum wrote:
> I went away for a week, and while I was away, apt-get upgraded glibc
> packages to 2.3.2-4.80.8 on my RH8 machine. X is now broken-- not
> completely but apps either don't work, or don't behave co
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 02:36, John Ketchum wrote:
> I went away for a week, and while I was away, apt-get upgraded glibc
> packages to 2.3.2-4.80.8 on my RH8 machine. X is now broken-- not
> completely but apps either don't work, or don't behave correctly. I'm
> using a custom compiled kernel,
I went away for a week, and while I was away, apt-get upgraded glibc
packages to 2.3.2-4.80.8 on my RH8 machine. X is now broken-- not
completely but apps either don't work, or don't behave correctly. I'm
using a custom compiled kernel, but I tried booting into a RH kernel
(2.4.18-14), which
