Re: NTP in default installation

2002-11-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, John wrote: > On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jacò Botha wrote: > > > Could all of those people using NTP please have a look at bugzilla 78025 ? > > > > I was completely knocked off my chair this morning reading the response from > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Am I missing

Re: NTP in default installation

2002-11-19 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:41:08 +0800 (WST), John wrote: > On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jacò Botha wrote: > > > Could all of those people using NTP please have a look at bugzilla > > 78025 ? > > > > I was completely knocked off my chair this morni

Re: NTP in default installation

2002-11-19 Thread John
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jacò Botha wrote: > Could all of those people using NTP please have a look at bugzilla 78025 ? > > I was completely knocked off my chair this morning reading the response from > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Am I missing something obvious? Why don't you post it here f

RE: NTP in default installation

2002-11-19 Thread Pavel Rozenboim
Actually NTP works for me out of the box on 2 machines - 1 updated from 7.3 other - fresh installation. > -Original Message- > From: Jacò Botha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tue, November 19, 2002 4:51 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: NTP in default installatio

NTP in default installation

2002-11-19 Thread Jacò Botha
Could all of those people using NTP please have a look at bugzilla 78025 ? I was completely knocked off my chair this morning reading the response from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Am I missing something obvious? Jaco. -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/lis