> ** Reply to message from ABrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 09 Mar 2003
10:57:07 -0600
>
> > On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 09:36:30 -0500
> > John Lowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You don't know me, Mr. Lowell, and I don't know you. Nor will we ever
> > get to know each other.
> >
> > I've jus
On 11:09 09 Mar 2003, Jack Bowling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| ** Reply to message from ABrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 09 Mar 2003 10:57:07
-0600
| > I've just introduced you to my "delete at server" filter, a special
| > status reserved for the very elite asswipes among us.
| > Soon you'll b
** Reply to message from ABrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 09 Mar 2003 10:57:07 -0600
> On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 09:36:30 -0500
> John Lowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You don't know me, Mr. Lowell, and I don't know you. Nor will we ever
> get to know each other.
>
> I've just introduced you to
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, John Nall wrote:
> At 08:47 AM 3/9/2003 -0800, Stephen Carville wrote:
>
> >He certainly is a persistent troll.
>
> You guys (and girls) should give Mr. Lowell more respect. You may not know
> it, but Linux is just a hobby with him. His real job is as a senior member
> of
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 09:36:30AM -0500, John Lowell wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> >no, but frankly, *you're* starting to get a bit tedious.
> >
> >rday
> >
> Do I need you for anything, Mr. Day?
Probably. From what I've been able to determine on this list, he's got
a few extra clues and
On Sunday 09 March 2003 09:09, John Nall uttered:
> You guys (and girls) should give Mr. Lowell more respect. You may not know
> it, but Linux is just a hobby with him. His real job is as a senior member
> of the Bush diplomatic team to North Korea.
-ouch-
Hey, I bet if we all just stop replyin
At 08:47 AM 3/9/2003 -0800, Stephen Carville wrote:
He certainly is a persistent troll.
You guys (and girls) should give Mr. Lowell more respect. You may not know
it, but Linux is just a hobby with him. His real job is as a senior member
of the Bush diplomatic team to North Korea.
John
--
On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 09:36:30 -0500
John Lowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You don't know me, Mr. Lowell, and I don't know you. Nor will we ever
get to know each other.
I've just introduced you to my "delete at server" filter, a special
status reserved for the very elite asswipes among us.
Soon y
He certainly is a persistent troll.
On Saturday 08 March 2003 05:41 pm, John Lowell wrote:
> Earlier today, I posted a simple yes-or-no question to to the list
and
> got back a lecture and some abuse from a Michael Schwendt. After a
> couple of additional, similar messages fr
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, John Lowell wrote:
> John Nall wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 20:41, John Lowell wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Earlier today, I posted a simple yes-or-no question to to the list and
> >>got back a lecture and some abuse from a Michael S
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
no, but frankly, *you're* starting to get a bit tedious.
rday
Do I need you for anything, Mr. Day?
John Lowell
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
On 01:20 09 Mar 2003, John Lowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| John Nall wrote:
| >On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 20:41, John Lowell wrote:
| >>Earlier today, I posted a simple yes-or-no question to to the list and
| >>got back a lecture and some abuse from a Michael Schwendt. A
On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 20:41:55 -0500
John Lowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> insightfully noted:
>Earlier today, I posted a simple yes-or-no question to to the list and
>got back a lecture and some abuse from a Michael Schwendt. After a
>couple of additional, similar messages from him,
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Lowell wrote:
> Earlier today, I posted a simple yes-or-no question to to the list and
> got back a lecture and some abuse from a Michael Schwendt. After a
> couple of additional, similar messages from him, I specifically told him
> in the clearest possib
John Nall wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 20:41, John Lowell wrote:
Earlier today, I posted a simple yes-or-no question to to the list and
got back a lecture and some abuse from a Michael Schwendt. After a
couple of additional, similar messages from him, I specifically told him
in the clearest
On 20:41 08 Mar 2003, John Lowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Earlier today, I posted a simple yes-or-no question to to the list and
| got back a lecture and some abuse from a Michael Schwendt. After a
| couple of additional, similar messages from him, I specifically told him
| in the cl
got back a lecture and some abuse from a Michael Schwendt. After a
> couple of additional, similar messages from him, I specifically told him
> in the clearest possible terms not to contact me again. He has,
> nevertheless. Has anyone else here ever been similarly annoyed by Mr
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 18:41, John Lowell wrote:
> Earlier today, I posted a simple yes-or-no question to to the list and
> got back a lecture and some abuse from a Michael Schwendt. After a
> couple of additional, similar messages from him, I specifically told him
> in the clear
** Reply to message from John Lowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 08 Mar 2003 20:41:55
-0500
> Earlier today, I posted a simple yes-or-no question to to the list and
> got back a lecture and some abuse from a Michael Schwendt. After a
> couple of additional, similar messa
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 20:41, John Lowell wrote:
> Earlier today, I posted a simple yes-or-no question to to the list and
> got back a lecture and some abuse from a Michael Schwendt. After a
> couple of additional, similar messages from him, I specifically told him
> in the clear
Earlier today, I posted a simple yes-or-no question to to the list and
got back a lecture and some abuse from a Michael Schwendt. After a
couple of additional, similar messages from him, I specifically told him
in the clearest possible terms not to contact me again. He has,
nevertheless. Has
21 matches
Mail list logo
