s for all the help. I did some tests with LVM and ext3 and it works
> very well on my systems.
>
> Any known performance issues by the LVM overhead ?
>From what I remember, snapshots may induce some issues.
The folks on the linux-lvm list at sistina.com are very helpful. You could a
Am Son, 2003-02-23 um 01.10 schrieb toby:
> With ext3 you can go up or down in size. Xfs can only increase, I believe. Xfs
> does play well with other stuff though such as acl, attrib, quotas over nfs and
> seems faster. [..]
Thanks for all the help. I did some tests with LVM and ex
Peter Boy wrote:
>
> I have to reinstall my system and consider to choose LVM for all HD
> space besides /boot. I would like to be able to resize the space (and
> filesystems) for the several logical partitions. Which filesystem I
> should use to be able to do so? (the RH d
On Saturday 22 February 2003 15:51, Peter Boy uttered:
> I have to reinstall my system and consider to choose LVM for all HD
> space besides /boot. I would like to be able to resize the space (and
> filesystems) for the several logical partitions. Which filesystem I
> should use to b
I have to reinstall my system and consider to choose LVM for all HD
space besides /boot. I would like to be able to resize the space (and
filesystems) for the several logical partitions. Which filesystem I
should use to be able to do so? (the RH docu is not very detailed
regarding LVM)
Thanks
On Friday 07 February 2003 10:55, Tom Georgoulias wrote:
> I see the exact same thing, except on a 7.3 system. When I'm running
> kernels 2.4.18-18 & 2.4.18-24, the default rc.sysinit works. When I use
> 2.4.18-19, it doesn't. 2.4.18-19 never loads lvm-mod on it's ow
Michael Robbert wrote:
I've recently setup LVM on a couple of standard Red Hat boxes and in
both cases they will not boot once the LVM partition is in /etc/fstab,
unless I edit /etc/rc.sysinit.
I see the exact same thing, except on a 7.3 system. When I'm running
kernels 2.4.18-18 &
On Friday 07 February 2003 08:44, Michael Robbert wrote:
> Why isn't /proc/lvm present at this point or why is Red Hat needing it
> to be there? When I take that out the boot happens fine and LVM works
> properly. In both instances I have setup the LVM after the install not
> duri
I've recently setup LVM on a couple of standard Red Hat boxes and in
both cases they will not boot once the LVM partition is in /etc/fstab,
unless I edit /etc/rc.sysinit. I have found through experimentation that
I need to make the following changes in order for the boot to complete.
310c310
On Saturday 01 February 2003 10:29, Jesse Keating uttered:
> Basically ks dies with a python traceback ending in something like "Unable
> to create vg lvm"
>
> Has anybody been able to successfuly create LVM groups like this in a
> kickstart install? I'd like to know
I'm seeing a weird issue where kickstart will die if I try to create some LVM
volumes to install do.
Here is the relevant part of my ksconfig:
clearpart --all --initlabel
part /boot --fstype ext3 --size 100 --ondisk sda
part / --fstype ext3 --size 1500 --ondisk sda --grow
part swap --siz
I'm having some very strange boot issues w/ an LVM system. I have 2 nearly
identical systems. Dual Xeon, 3ware 8 port controller, 8 200gig IDE drives
connected to it, raid 5, and one 40gig IDE drive connected to the standard
IDE bus.
On the single 40gig drive, there is a /boot partitio
On Thursday 30 January 2003 11:14, Javier Gostling wrote:
> The system I'm using right now has such a setup. /boot is /dev/hda1,
> swap is /dev/hda2 and the rest (/, /home, /usr, /usr/local, etc.) are on
> logical volumes. i even left some spare space to add to any partition
> which requires the ex
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 15:22, Jesse Keating wrote:
> I've got an LVM question...
>
> I've been told it's possible, but I'm kinda looking for real world examples.
>
> I want to have a straight IDE drive, only thing that would be on it is /boot.
> There wil
I've got an LVM question...
I've been told it's possible, but I'm kinda looking for real world examples.
I want to have a straight IDE drive, only thing that would be on it is /boot.
There will be a 3-ware IDE raid controller, and LVM volume groups on top of
the raid
It is in rc.sysinit search for LVM the appears to be a error in the script it looks for /proc/lvm but proc/lvm doesn't exist untile you run vgchange -a y so I fixed that problem also I removed vgscan since It will over write the exisiting dat is run again which i have heard can case pro
> --- Message d'origine --- > > From : Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date : Fri, 29 Nov 2002 01:12:11 -0800 (PST) > >>Finally got a disk array and was playing with LVM. One issue cropped up >and I haven't found an answer yet on Google and/o
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, toby wrote:
> Markku Kolkka wrote:
> >
> > Viestissä Perjantai 29. Marraskuuta 2002 11:12, Keith Morse kirjoitti:
> > > I'm having a dickens of a time trying to figure
> > > out where LVM gets initialized at in the startup
Markku Kolkka wrote:
>
> Viestissä Perjantai 29. Marraskuuta 2002 11:12, Keith Morse kirjoitti:
> > I'm having a dickens of a time trying to figure
> > out where LVM gets initialized at in the startup scripts.
>
> /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit:
>
> # LVM initializat
Viestissä Perjantai 29. Marraskuuta 2002 11:12, Keith Morse kirjoitti:
> I'm having a dickens of a time trying to figure
> out where LVM gets initialized at in the startup scripts.
/etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit:
# LVM initialization
if [ -e /proc/lvm -a -x /sbin/vgchange -a -f /etc/lvm
Finally got a disk array and was playing with LVM. One issue cropped up
and I haven't found an answer yet on Google and/or the list archives.
After creating the logical volume and putting an entry into /etc/fstab,
the system complains on reboot that it can't check the filesystem as
Has anyone used EVMS how does it compare to LVM or LVM2. Like to hear pros and cons on either.
PierreDo you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, LENHOF Jean-Yves wrote:
> ...
> After mounting file system with quota enabled
>
> touch /home/quota.user
> touch /home/quota.group
> should help you
after creating the quota files (aquota.{user|group}) the quotacheck
command didn't give the 'Cannot get quotafile name' me
>>
>>on a Red Hat 7.3 system & non-LVM filesystem which doesn't have a
>>quotafile, the command creates the quotafile. when i run the same command
>>on a Psyche system & LVM filesystem i get the following message:
>> quotacheck: Cannot get quotafile name
> --- Message d'origine ---
>
> From : Marko Asplund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date : Tue, 12 Nov 2002 14:11:54 +0200 (EET)
>
>
>are filesystem quotas supposed to work with LVM on Psyche? when i run
> /sbin/quotachec
are filesystem quotas supposed to work with LVM on Psyche? when i run
/sbin/quotacheck -v -F vfsv0 /home
on a Red Hat 7.3 system & non-LVM filesystem which doesn't have a
quotafile, the command creates the quotafile. when i run the same command
on a Psyche system & LVM fil
I have been experimenting with LVM. Made a logical
volumes of var and home no problems but when I did one
for /tmp the gui will crash I find that I can not
start xfs as long as I have /tmp setup as a logicsal
volume no matter what size. Why is that.
Pierre
On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 16:36, Pierre Lamb wrote:
> Are there any gui frontends to LVM I found a few but appear to be old.
>
Webmin has a fairly nice frontend for it.
I've played with it and have found it fairly intuitive & robust
--
Tony Placilla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keeper o
Are there any gui frontends to LVM I found a few but appear to be old.Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive medley & videos from Greatest Hits CD
I have mad a lv for var and moved the files to it lvm
works havn't had any problems, but when I try to make
/tmp into a lv and reboot X(gui) fails. It shouldn't
just bacuse I made it a lv should it
__
Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH -
I was thinking that because /proc/lvn doesn't exisit until yuou do vgchange -a y
Pierre
Bradley Tate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looked like a bug to me so I just removed the /proc/lvm test from the line and it works fine.Bradley.Pierre Lamb wrote:> Trying to get LVM to work. lvm-m
Looked like a bug to me so I just removed the /proc/lvm test from the
line and it works fine.
Bradley.
Pierre Lamb wrote:
Trying to get LVM to work. lvm-mod gets leoade ok but there isn't
anything in /proc until I do a vgchange -ay then it shows up and
Icannount the fs. The rc.sysinit
Trying to get LVM to work. lvm-mod gets leoade ok but there isn't anything in /proc until I do a vgchange -ay then it shows up and Icannount the fs. The rc.sysinit looks for /proc/lvm then it supposed to do a vgchange but can't because /proc/lvm dosen't exist. What is wrong ??
had opted for the default ext3 filesystem during install
and made the
> appropriate partitions.
>
> A few days later I realized that the hard disk space
(50GB) would run
> out within a few months. I now want to use LVM , so that
new hard disks
> can be plugged in with little effort , at
Viestissä Perjantai 25. Lokakuuta 2002 07:20, S Mathur kirjoitti:
> My question: Can I convert the existing ext3 setup into an LVM managed
> system without going through the complete installation process again?
It's possible (but reinstall may be easier). Read section 11.8 of the LVM
few months. I now want to use LVM , so that new hard disks
can be plugged in with little effort , at a later date.
My question: Can I convert the existing ext3 setup into an LVM managed
system without going through the complete installation process again?
Thanks
Mathur
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 08:29:15PM +0200, Robert Claeson wrote:
> Uhm, okay. I'll use that. I think I should read the docs better,
> shouldn't I?
The source, actually ;-)
Mirek
lör 2002-10-12 klockan 19.40 skrev Miloslav Trmac:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 05:52:11PM +0200, Robert Claeson wrote:
> > I didn't know that. Thank's for the update. However, being able to
> > create file systems as JFS during install would be highly desirable.
> Start your install with 'linux jfs',
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 05:52:11PM +0200, Robert Claeson wrote:
> I didn't know that. Thank's for the update. However, being able to
> create file systems as JFS during install would be highly desirable.
Start your install with 'linux jfs', but this makes your system completely
unsupported by Red H
lör 2002-10-12 klockan 17.06 skrev Miloslav Trmac:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 09:50:49AM +0200, Robert Claeson wrote:
> > build your own kernel to use it until Red Hat decides to put it into
> > their kernel (and when they do, I really wouldn't mind having JFS in
> > there, too).
> JFS is in the RHL
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 09:50:49AM +0200, Robert Claeson wrote:
> build your own kernel to use it until Red Hat decides to put it into
> their kernel (and when they do, I really wouldn't mind having JFS in
> there, too).
JFS is in the RHL 8.0 kernel, actually.
Mirek
tor 2002-10-10 klockan 17.48 skrev Patrick:
> I few weeks ago at IBM I got a little demo of (something similar to) LVM
> on their latest AIX and it was quite impressive. So I installed RH8 with
> LVM. Now I am trying to make /home and / bigger (see below for an
> overview) but I am
42 matches
Mail list logo
