On Tuesday 01 April 2003 17:34, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> It is probably the release noted that bothered me not you document
> but I was annoyed that once again fdisk which is a superior
> partitioning produce (in terms of simplicity of use) is be
> deprecated. Especially once one installs th linux I
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 01:00:33AM -0700, Dax Kelson wrote:
> I written up a close examination of Red Hat Linux 9. The review covers
> three main categories:
>
> * Architectural & behavioral changes
> * Installer changes
> * Changes to included software packages
>
> This is a NOT a fluff ("the fo
TECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: In-depth review of RHL9 technical changes
>
>
> I written up a close examination of Red Hat Linux 9. The review covers
> three main categories:
>
> * Architectural & behavioral changes
> * Installer changes
> * Changes to
Very informative! Thanks!
Will Mendez
Toaster[2]
Mmmm...XSI
www.xsibase.com
www.xsimontreal.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Scott Kindley
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:38 PM
To: Pysche List
Subject: Re: In-depth review of RHL9
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 03:00, Dax Kelson wrote:
(snipped)
>
> http://www.GuruLabs.com/RedHatLinux9-review.html
>
> Comments and feedback welcome.
>
> Dax Kelson
> Guru Labs
Good writing. I like the style you presented it in. More please ;)
--
Scott Kindley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KindleyNet Commun
Dax Kelson wrote:
I written up a close examination of Red Hat Linux 9. The review covers
three main categories:
[snip]
You can find the review at:
http://www.GuruLabs.com/RedHatLinux9-review.html
Comments and feedback welcome.
Dax,
I thought the review was very well done and answered a lot of qu
I written up a close examination of Red Hat Linux 9. The review covers
three main categories:
* Architectural & behavioral changes
* Installer changes
* Changes to included software packages
This is a NOT a fluff ("the fonts are as pretty as Windows") review.
This document is meant for system ad
